BACKGROUND: Learner feedback is the primary method for evaluating clinical faculty, despite few existing standards for measuring learner assessments.
OBJECTIVE: To review the published literature on instruments for evaluating clinical teachers and to summarize themes that will aid in developing universally appealing tools.
DESIGN: Searching 5 electronic databases revealed over 330 articles. Excluded were reviews, editorials, and qualitative studies. Twenty-one articles describing instruments designed for evaluating clinical faculty by learners were found. Three investigators studied these papers and tabulated characteristics of the learning environments and validation methods. Salient themes among the evaluation studies were determined.
MAIN RESULTS: Many studies combined evaluations from both outpatient and inpatient settings and some authors combined evaluations from different learner levels. Wide ranges in numbers of teachers, evaluators, evaluations, and scale items were observed. The most frequently encountered statistical methods were factor analysis and determining internal consistency reliability with Cronbach’s α. Less common methods were the use of test-retest reliability, interrater reliability, and convergent validity between validated instruments. Fourteen domains of teaching were identified and the most frequently studied domains were interpersonal and clinical-teaching skills.
CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics of teacher evaluations vary between educational settings and between different learner levels, indicating that future studies should utilize more narrowly defined study populations. A variety of validation methods including temporal stability, interrater reliability, and convergent validity should be considered. Finally, existing data support the validation of instruments comprised solely of interpersonal and clinical-teaching domains.
validity evaluation studies medical faculty
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
Copeland HL, Hewson MG. Developing and testing an instrument to measure the effectiveness of clinical teaching in an academic medical center. Acad Med. 2000;75:161–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly MB, Woolliscroft JO. Evaluation of instructors by third year medical students. Acad Med. 1989;64:159–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donner-Banzhoff N, Merle H, Baum E, Basler HD. Feedback for general practice trainers: developing and testing a standardized instrument using the importance-quality-score method. Med Educ. 2003;37:772–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyatt GH, Nishikawa J, Willan A, et al. A measurement process for evaluating clinical teachers in internal medicine. Can Med Assoc J. 1993;149:1097–102.Google Scholar
Hayward RA, Williams BC, Gruppen LD, Rosenbaum D. Measuring attending physician performance in a general medicine outpatient clinic. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:504–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irby DM, Rakestraw P. Evaluating clinical teaching in medicine. J Med Educ. 1981;56:181–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
James PA, Osborne JW. A measure of medical instructional quality in ambulatory settings: the MedIQ. Fam Med. 1999;31:263–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Litzelman DK, Westmorland GR, Skeff KM, Stratos GA. Student and resident evaluations of faculty—how reliable are they? Acad Med. 1999;74(suppl Oct):s25-s27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litzelman DK, Stratos GA, Marriott DJ, Skeff KM. Factorial validation of a widely disseminated educational framework for evaluating clinical teachers. Acad Med. 1998;73:688–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcgill MK, McClure C, Commerford K. A system for evaluating teaching in the ambulatory setting. Fam Med. 1986;18:173–4.Google Scholar
McLeod PJ, James CA, Abrahamowicz M. Clinical tutor evaluation: a 5-year study by students on an in-patient service and residents in an ambulatory care clinic. Med Educ. 1993;27:48–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsbottom-Lucier MT, Gillmore GM, Irby DM, Ramsey PG. Evaluation of clinical teaching by general internal medicine faculty in outpatient and inpatient settings. Acad Med. 1994;69:152–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risucci DA, Lutsky L, Rosati RJ, Tortolani AJ. Reliability and accuracy of resident evaluations of surgical faculty. Eval Health Prof. 1992;15:313–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shellenberger S, Mahan JM. A factor analytic study of teaching in off-campus general practice clerkships. Med Educ. 1982;16:151–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Solomon DJ, Speer AJ, Rosebraugh CJ, DiPette DJ. The reliability of medical student ratings of clinical teaching. Eval Health Prof. 1997;20:343–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner IP, Franc-Law J, Kelly KD, Rowe BH. Faculty evaluation by residents in an emergency medicine program: a new evaluation instrument. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:1015–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Williams BC, Litzelman DK, Babbott SF, Lubitz RM, Hofer TP. Validation of a global measure of faculty’s clinical teaching performance. Acad Med. 2002;77:177–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell L, Tallett S, Haist S, et al. A review of the evaluation of clinical teaching: new perspectives and challenges. Med Educ. 2000;34:862–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams RG, Klamen DA, McGaghie WC. Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings. Teach Learn Med. 2003;15:270–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 1999.Google Scholar