Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 19, Issue 10, pp 991–998

Primary care experiences of medicare beneficiaries, 1998 to 2000

  • Jana E. Montgomery
  • Julie T. Irish
  • Ira B. Wilson
  • Hong Chang
  • Angela C. Li
  • William H. Rogers
  • Dana Gelb Safran
Original Articles

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in the quality of primary care experienced and reported by Medicare beneficiaries from 1998 to 2000.

DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study.

SETTING: Thirteen states with large, mature Medicare HMO markets.

PARTICIPANTS: Probability sample of noninstitutionalized Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older enrolled in traditional Medicare (FFS) or a Medicare HMO.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We examined 2-year changes in 9 measures derived from the Primary Care Assessment Survey (PCAS). The measures covered 2 broad areas of primary care performance: quality of physician-patient interactions (5 measures) and structural/organizational features of care (4 measures). For each measure, we computed the change in each beneficiary’s score (1998 vs 2000) and standardized effect sizes (ES). Results revealed significant declines in 3 measures of physician-patient interaction quality (communication, interpersonal treatment, and thoroughness of physical exams; P≤.0001). Physicians’ knowledge of patients increased significantly over the 2-year period (P≤.001). Patient trust did not change (P=.10). With regard to structural/organizational features of care, there were significant declines in financial access (P≤.001), visit-based continuity (P<.001), and integration of care (P≤.05), while organizational access increased (P≤.05). With the exception of financial access, observed changes did not differ by system (FFS, HMO).

CONCLUSIONS: Over a 2-year period, the quality of seniors’ interactions with their primary physicians declined significantly, as did other hallmarks of primary care such as continuity, integration of care, and financial access. This decline is in sharp contrast to the marked improvements in technical quality that have been measured over this period. In an era marked by substantial national investment in quality monitoring, measures of these elements of care are notably absent from the nation’s portfolio of quality indicators.

Key words

primary care quality doctor-patient relationships access to care quality assessment Medicare 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Institute of Medicine. Report of a Study: A Manpower Policy for Primary Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 1978.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Millis JS. The Millis Commission Report. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 1966.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Starfield B. Primary Care: Concept. Evaluation and Policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alpert J, Charney E. The Education of Physicians for Primary Care. Washington, DC: U.S. DHEW; 1973.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Institute of Medicine. Primary Care: America’s Health in a New Era. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the Twenty-first Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    1987 NMES Household Survey and Health Insurance Plans Survey Data (CD-ROM). Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Center for Cost and Financing Studies. Version AHCPR 98-DP02. Rockville, Md: AHCPR; 1998.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Safran DG. The future of primary care: views from the patient. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:248–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weiss LJ, Blustein J. Faithful patients: the effect of long-term physician-patient relationships on the costs and use of health care by older Americans. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:1742–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Data from Access to Care File. Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey 1999. Available at: http://cms.hhs.gov/MCBS/. Accessed February 13, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Safran DG, Wilson IB, Rogers WH, Montgomery JE, Chang H. Primary care quality in the Medicare program: comparing the performance of HMOs and traditional Medicare. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:757–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keating NL, Green DC, Kao AC, Gazmararian JA, Wu VY, Cleary PD. How are patients’ specific ambulatory care experiences related to trust, satisfaction, and considering changing physicians? J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:29–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Emanuel EJ, Dubler NN. Preserving the physician-patient relationship in the era of managed care. JAMA. 1995;273:323–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murphy J, Chang H, Montgomery J, Rogers WH, Safran DG. The quality of physician-patient relationships: patients’ experiences 1996–1999. J Fam Pract. 2001;50:123–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoffman C, Rice D, Sung H-Y. Persons with chronic conditions: their prevalence and costs. JAMA. 1996;276:1473–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Safran DG, Kosinski M, Tarlov AR, et al. The Primary Care Assessment Survey tests of data quality and measurement performance. Med Care. 1998;36:728–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare Managed Care Contract Plans Monthly Summary Report. Washington, DC: CMS; 2002.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dillman DA. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York, NY: John Wiley; 1978.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McHorney CA, Ware JEJ, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994;32:40–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shea S, Stein AD, Lantigua R, Basch CE. Reliability of the behavioral risk factor survey in a triethnic population. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133:489–500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Katz JN, Chang LC, Sangha O, Fossel AH, Bates DW. Can comorbidity be measured by questionnaire rather than medical record review? Med Care. 1996;34:73–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis. 1987;40:373–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Adams PF, Morano MA. Current Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1994: Supplement on Aging. Vital Health Stat 10. Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics; 1995;193:413–60.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Safran DG. Defining Primary Care. A Background Paper Prepared for the Institute of Medicine Committee on the Future of Primary Care. Boston, Mass: New England Medical Center; 1994.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davies AR, Ware JE, Brook RH, Peterson JR, Newhouse JP. Consumer acceptance of prepaid and fee-for-service medical care: results from a randomized controlled trial. Health Serv Res. 1986;21:429–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ware JE, Snyder MK, Wright WR. Results regarding scales constructed from the patient satisfaction questionnaire and measure of other health perceptions. In: Development and Validation of Scales to Measure Patient Satisfaction with Health Care Services, I. Development and Validation of Scales to Measure Patient Satisfaction with Health Care Services. Springfield, VA: National Technical Service; 1976; NTIS publication PB:288–330.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    United States Congress Office of Technology Assessment. The Quality of Medical Care: Information for Consumers. U.S. Congress Report OTA-H-386. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1988:231–43.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sox HC, Margulies I, Sox CH. Psychologically mediated effects of diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med. 1981;95:680–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Murray A, Safran DG. The Primary Care Assessment Survey: a tool for measuring, monitoring, and improving primary care. In: Maruish ME, ed. Handbook of Psychological Assessment in Primary Care Settings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2000:623–51.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability. Med Care. 1996;34:220–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, Mass: New England Medical Center; 1993.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hargraves JL, Wilson IB, Zaslavsky A, et al. Adjusting for patient characteristics when analyzing reports from patients about hospital care. Med Care. 2001;39:635–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zaslavsky AM, Zaborski LB, Ding L, Shaul JA, Cioffi MJ, Cleary PD. Adjusting performance measures to ensure equitable plan comparisons. Health Care Finance Rev. 2002;22:109–26.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pascoe GC. Patient satisfaction in primary health care: a literature review and analysis. Eval Program Plann. 1983;6:185–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Smith R, Woodward N, Wallston B, Wallston K. Health care implications of desire and expectancy for control in elderly adults. J Gerontol. 1998;43:P1-P7.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Haug M, Ory MG. Issues in elderly patientpprovider interactions. Res Aging. 1987;3:3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mechanic D, McAlpine DD, Rosenthal M. Are patients’ office visits with physicians getting shorter? N Engl J Med. 2001;344:198–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stafford RS, Saglam D, Causino N, et al. Trends in adult visits to primary care physicians in the United States. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:26–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Counte M. The emerging role of the client in the delivery of primary care to older Americans. In: Ory MG, Cooper J, Siu A, eds. Special Supplement to Health Services Research. Organizational Issues in the Delivery of Primary Care to Older Americans; 1998;32:402–23.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kizer KW. Establishing health care performance standards in an era of consumerism. JAMA. 2001;286:1213–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Robinson JC. The end of managed care. JAMA. 2001;285:2622–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    DiMatteo MR. Enhancing patient adherence to medical recommendations. JAMA. 1994;271:79–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    DiMatteo MR, Sherbourne CD, Hays RD, et al. Physicians’ characteristics influence patients’ adherence to medical treatment: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Health Psychol. 1993;12:93–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Francis V, Korsch BM, Morris MJ. Gaps in doctor-patient communication: patients’ response to medical advice. N Engl J Med. 1969;280:535–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Safran DG, Murray A, Chang H, Montgomery JE, Murphy J, Rogers WH. Linking doctor-patient relationship quality to outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(suppl):116.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Safran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Ware JE, Tarlov AR. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Fam Pract. 1998;47:213–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE Jr. Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:520–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JEJ, Yano EM, Frank HJ. Patients’ participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:448–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995;152:1423–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Roter DL, Hall JA, Kern DE, Barker LR, Cole KA, Roca RP. Improving physicians’ interviewing skills and reducing patients’ emotional distress. A randomized clinical trial. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1877–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Safran DG, Montgomery JE, Chang H, Murphy J, Rogers WH. Switching doctors: predictors of voluntary disenrollment from a primary physician’s practice. J Fam Pract. 2001;50:130–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel RM. Physician-patient communication: the relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA. 1997;277:553–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Beckman HB, Markakis KM, Suchman AL, Frankel RM. The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice: lessons from plaintiff depositions. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1365–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hickson GB, Clayton EW, Entman SS, et al. Obstetricians’ prior malpractice experience and patients’ satisfaction with care. JAMA. 1994;272:1583–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Health Care Financing Administration. Medicare Managed Care Compare. Health Care Financing Administration [cited October 15, 1998]. Available at: http://www.medicare.gov/mphCompare/home.asp. Accessed February 13, 2004.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Health Care Financing Administration. Medicare+Choice: Changes for the Year 2000. Health Care Financing Administration. Available at: http://www.hcfa.gov/medicare/mgdcar1.htm. Accessed February 13, 2004.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Achman L, Gold M. Report No. 533. Medicare+Choice: Beneficiaries Will Face Higher Cost-sharing in 2002. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2002.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Safran DG, Neuman P, Schoen C, et al. Prescription drug coverage and seniors: how well are states closing the gap? Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21:W253-W268.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Laschober MA, Kitchman M, Neuman P, Strabic AA. Trends in Medicare supplemental insurance and prescription drug coverage, 1996–1999. Health Affairs—Web Exclusive. 2002;21(February 27):W127-W138.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Institute of Medicine. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Healthcare. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Jencks SF, Huff ED, Cuerdon T. Change in the quality of care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries, 1998–1999 to 2000–2001. JAMA. 2003;289:305–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    National Committee for Quality Assurance. State of Managed Care Quality 2000. Washington, DC: NCQA; 2000.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    National Committee for Quality Assurance. State of Managed Care Quality, 2001. Washington, DC: NCQA; 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jana E. Montgomery
    • 1
  • Julie T. Irish
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ira B. Wilson
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Hong Chang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Angela C. Li
    • 1
  • William H. Rogers
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dana Gelb Safran
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.The Health InstituteTufts University School of MedicineBoston
  2. 2.Division of Clinical Care Research. Tufts-New England Medical CenterTufts University School of MedicineBoston
  3. 3.Department of MedicineTufts University School of MedicineBoston
  4. 4.The Health InstituteTufts-New England Medical CenterBoston

Personalised recommendations