PURPOSE: Provision of interpreter services for non-English-speaking patients is a federal requirement. We surveyed clinicians to describe their experience using interpreters.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study we surveyed clinicians in three academic outpatient settings in San Francisco (N=194) regarding their most recent patient encounter which involved an interpreter. Questions about the visit included type of interpreter, satisfaction with content of clinical encounter, potential problems, and frequency of need. Previous training in interpreter use, languages spoken, and demographics were also asked. Questionnaires were self-administered in approximately 10 minutes.
RESULTS: Of 194 questionnaires mailed, 158 were completed (81% response rate) and 67% were from resident physicians. Most respondents (78%) were very satisfied or satisfied with the medical care they provided, 85% felt satisfied with their ability to diagnose a disease and treat a disease, but only 45% were satisfied with their ability to empower the patient with knowledge about their disease, treatment, or medication. Even though 71% felt they were able to make a personal connection with their patient, only 33% felt they had learned about another culture as a result of the encounter. Clinicians reported difficulties eliciting exact symptoms (70%), explaining treatments (44%), and eliciting treatment preferences (51%). Clinicians perceived that lack of knowledge of a patient’s culture hindered their ability to provide quality medical care and only 18% felt they were unable to establish trust or rapport. Previous training in interpreter use was associated with increased use of professional interpreters (odds ratio [OR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4 to 7.5) and increased satisfaction with medical care provided (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 6.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians reported communication difficulties affecting their ability to understand symptoms and treat disease, as well as their ability to empower patients regarding their healthcare. Training in the use of interpreters may improve communication and clinical care, and thus health outcomes.
interpreters language barriers patient-clinician communication
US Bureau of the Census. Table 1, Language Use and English Ability, Persons 5 Years and Over, by State. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office; 2000.Google Scholar
Carasquillo O, Orav EJ, Burstin HR. Impact of language barriers on patient satisfaction in an emergency department. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:82–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkman-Liff B, Mondragon D. Language of interview: relevance for research of southwest Hispanics. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1399–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasater LM, Davidson AJ, Steiner JF, Mehler PS. Glycemic control in English- vs Spanish-speaking Hispanic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:77–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manson A. Language concordance as a determinant of patient compliance and emergency room use in patients with asthma. Med Care. 1988;26:1119–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derose KP, Baker DW. Limited English proficiency and Latinos’ use of physician services. Med Care Res Rev. 2000;57:76–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Sarver J, Baker DW. Effect of language barriers on follow-up appointments after an emergency department visit. J Gen Internal Med. 2000;15:256–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Stable EJ, Napoles-Springer A, Miramonts JM. The effects of ethnicity and language on medical outcomes of patients with hypertension or diabetes. Med Care. 1997;35:1212–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons L, Day S. Improving obstetric outcomes in ethnic minorities: an evaluation of health advocacy in Hackney. J Public Health Med. 1992;14:183–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kline F, Acosta FX, Austin W, Johnson RG. The misunderstood Spanish-speaking patient. Am J Psychiatry. 1980;137:1530–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Tocher T, Larson E. Quality of diabetes care for non-English-speaking patients: a comparative study. West J Med. 1998;168:504–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Jacobs EA, Lauderdale DS, Meltzer D, Shorey JM, Levinson W, Thisted RA. Impact of interpreter services on delivery of health care to limited-English-proficient patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:468–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health. National Standards of Cultural and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health Care. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office; 2000.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Human Services. Guidance to Federal Financial Assistance Recipients Regarding Title vi Prohibition Against National Origin. Discrimination Affecting Limited English Proficient Persons. Washington, DC: US Office of Civil Rights; 2003.Google Scholar
1.Received from the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical Effectiveness Research Center for Diverse Populations, Center for Aging in Diverse CommunitiesUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan Francisco