Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 19, Issue 7, pp 779–782 | Cite as

Program directors’ views of the importance and prevalence of mentoring in internal medicine residencies

  • Analia CastiglioniEmail author
  • Lisa M. Bellini
  • Judy A. Shea
Brief Report


Program directors establish priorities for residency programs. Their views of mentoring likely influence the tone about and availability of mentoring programs. This survey to all internal medicine program directors assessed attitudes toward mentoring, existence of formal mentoring programs, and features of the mentoring programs. The response was 60%. The majority (>60%) favored mentoring. Forty-nine percent of the residencies had structured mentoring programs. Programs differed in frequency of meetings, use of evaluations, and presence of curriculum. Overall, although program directors’ attitudes are favorable and at least half have formal mentoring programs, the programs are largely unstructured, loosely monitored, and underevaluated.

Key words

mentoring resident education medicine program directors 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Levinson DJ. The Season’s of a Man’s Life. New York: Ballantine Books; 1978.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kroenke K. Mentorship. SGIM Forum. 2001;24:3–8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lorber J, Ecker M. Career development of female and male physicians. J Med Educ. 1983;58:447–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rogers JC, Holloway RL, Miller SM. Academic mentoring and family medicine’s research productivity. Fam Med. 1990;22:186–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chew LD, Watanabe JM, Buchwald D, Lessler DS. Junior faculty’s perspectives on mentoring. Acad Med. 2003;78:652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kirsling RA, Kochar MS. Mentors in graduate medical education at the Medical College of Wisconsin. Acad Med. 1990;65:272–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Souba WW. Mentoring young academic surgeons, our most precious asset. J Surg Res. 1999;82:113–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Galicia AR, Klima RR, Date ES. Mentorship in physical medicine and rehabilitation residencies. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;76:268–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Curtis JA, Adam H, Shelov SP. A formal mentoring program in pediatric residency. Acad Med. 1995;70:453–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA. 2002;287:226–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education. Internal Medicine Program Requirements. Available at: Accessed November 5, 2003.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    National Centers of Leadership in Academic Medicine. Recommendations for a Successful Mentoring Program. Available at: Accessed Apirl 28, 2004.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mark S, Link H, Morahan PS, Pololi L, Reznik V, Tropez-Sims S. Innovative mentoring programs to promote gender equity in academic medicine. Acad Med. 2001;76:39–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnson JC, Williams B, Jayadevappa R. Mentoring programs for minority faculty at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. Acad Med. 1999;74:376–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morzinski JA, Diehr S, Bower DJ, Simpson DE. A descriptive, cross-sectional study of formal mentoring for faculty. Fam Med. 1996;28:434–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Devillis RF. Scale Development. Theory and Applications. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 26, Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1991.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Woodward CA. Questionnaire construction and question writing for research in medical education. Med Educ. 1998;22:347–63.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schapira MM, Kalet A, Schwartz MD, Gerrity MS. Mentoring in general internal medicine: investment in our future. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:248–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Asch DA, Christakis NA, Ubel PA. Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget. A randomized trial comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives. Med Care. 1998;36:95–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Analia Castiglioni
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lisa M. Bellini
    • 2
  • Judy A. Shea
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of General Internal MedicineUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirmingham
  2. 2.Department of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations