Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 698–707

A practical guide to developing effective web-based learning

Review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Online learning has changed medical education, but many “educational” websites do not employ principles of effective learning. This article will assist readers in developing effective educational websites by integrating principles of active learning with the unique features of the Web.

DESIGN: Narrative review.

RESULTS: The key steps in developing an effective educational website are: Perform a needs analysis and specify goals and objectives; determine technical resources and needs; evaluate preexisting software and use it if it fully meets your needs; secure commitment from all participants and identify and address potential barriers to implementation; develop content in close coordination with website design (appropriately use multimedia, hyperlinks, and online communication) and follow a timeline; encourage active learning (self-assessment, reflection, self-directed learning, problem-based learning, learner interaction, and feedback); facilitate and plan to encourage use by the learner (make website accessible and user-friendly, provide time for learning, and motivate learners); evaluate learners and course; pilot the website before full implementation; and plan to monitor online communication and maintain the site by resolving technical problems, periodically verifying hyperlinks, and regularly updating content.

CONCLUSION: Teaching on the Web involves more than putting together a colorful webpage. By consistently employing principles of effective learning, educators will unlock the full potential of Web-based medical education.

Key words

Internet medical education World Wide Web e-learning curriculum development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    McKimm J, Jollie C, Cantillon P. ABC of learning and teaching: Web based learning. BMJ. 2003;326:870–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chumley-Jones HS, Dobbie A, Alford CL. Web-based learning: sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature. Acad Med. 2002;77(10 suppl):S86-S93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hallgren RC, Parkhurst PE, Monson CL, Crewe NM. An interactive, Web-based tool for learning anatomic landmarks. Acad Med. 2002;77:263–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kemper KJ, Amata-Kynvi A, Sanghavi D, et al. Randomized trial of an Internet curriculum on herbs and other dietary supplements for health care professionals. Acad Med. 2002;77:882–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spickard A III, Alrajeh N, Cordray D, Gigante J. Learning about screening using an online or live lecture: does it matter? J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:540–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kamin C, O’Sullivan P, Deterding R, Younger M. A comparison of critical thinking in groups of third-year medical students in text, video, and virtual PBL case modalities. Acad Med. 2003;78:204–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friedman RB. Top ten reasons the World Wide Web may fail to change medical education. Acad Med. 1996;71:979–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alur P, Fatima K, Joseph R. Medical teaching websites: do they reflect the learning paradigm? Med Teach. 2002;24:422–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Minasian-Batmanian LC. Guidelines for developing an online learning strategy for your subject. Med Teach. 2002;24:645–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horton S. Web Teaching Guide: A Practical Approach to Creating Course Web Sites. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cato J. User-centered Web Design. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited; 2001.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kern DE, Thomas PA, Howard DM, Bass EB. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-step Approach. Baltimore, Md: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhu E, Payette P, DeZure D. An Introduction to Teaching Online. CRLT Occasional Papers. Ann Arbor, Mich: University of Michigan; 2003.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koller CA, Frankenfield JJ, Sarley CA. Twelve tips for developing educational multimedia in a community-based teaching hospital. Med Teach. 2000;22:7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davis MH, Harden RM. E is for everything—e-learning? Med Teach. 2001;23:441–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Toohey S, Watson E. Twelve tips on choosing web teaching software. Med Teach. 2001;23:552–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Greenhalgh T. Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. BMJ. 2001;322:40–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bell DS, Fonarow GC, Hays RD, Mangione CM. Self-study from web-based and printed guideline materials: a randomized, controlled trial among resident physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:938–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grundman J, Wigton R, Nickol D. A controlled trial of an interactive, Web-based virtual reality program for teaching physical diagnosis skills to medical students. Acad Med. 2000;75(10 suppl):S47-S49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ludlow JB, Platin E. A comparison of Web page and slide/tape for instruction in periapical and panoramic radiographic anatomy. J Dent Educ. 2000;64:269–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Santer D, Michaelsen V, Erkonen W, et al. A comparison of educational interventions. Multimedia textbook, standard lecture, and printed textbook. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:297–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brooks DW. Web-teaching: A Guide to Designing Interactive Teaching for the World Wide Web. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosenberg MJ. E-learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2001.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sekikawa A, Aaron DJ, Acosta B, Sa E, LaPorte RE. Does the perception of downloading speed influence the evaluation of web-based lectures? Public Health. 2001;115:152–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yuh JL, Abbott AV, Ontai S. Pilot study of a rating instrument for medical education Web sites. Acad Med. 2000;75:290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoffman GM. Copyright in Cyberspace: Questions and Answers for Librarians. New York, NY: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.; 2001.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Collison G, Elbaum B, Haavind S, Tinker R. Facilitating Online Learning: Effective Strategies for Moderators. Madison, Wis: Atwood Publishing; 2000.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ellenchild Pinch W, Graves J. Using web-based discussion as a teaching strategy: bioethics as an exemplar. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:704–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lipman AJ, Sade RM, Glotzbach AL, Lancaster CJ, Marshall MF. The incremental value of Internet-based instruction as an adjunct to classroom instruction: a prospective randomized study. Acad Med. 2001;76:1060–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Steinert Y, McLeod P, Conochie L, Nasmith L. An online discussion for medical faculty: an experiment that failed. Acad Med. 2002;77:939–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jha V, Duffy S. Ten golden rules for designing software in medical education: results from a formative evaluation of DIALOG. Med Teach. 2002;24:417–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Krug S. Don’t Make Me Think! A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability. Indianapolis, Ind: Macmillan USA; 2000.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    The National Cancer Institute. Usability.gov: improving the communication of cancer research; Available at: http://usability.gov. Accessed June 4, 2003.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Meyers C, Jones TB. Promoting active learning: strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass Inc.; 1993.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kaufman DM. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: applying educational theory in practice. BMJ. 2003;326:213–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Papa FJ, Aldrich D, Schumacker RE. The effects of immediate online feedback upon diagnostic performance. Acad Med. 1999;74(10 suppl):S16-S18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jarvis P, Holford J, Griffin C. The Theory and Practice of Learning. London, UK: Kogan Page Limited; 1998.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Leong SL, Baldwin CD, Adelman AM. Integrating Web-based computer cases into a required clerkship: development and evaluation. Acad Med. 2003;78:295–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dornan T, Lee C, Stopford A. Skills base: a Web-based electronic learning portfolio for clinical skills. Acad Med. 2001;76:542–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Carr M, Hewitt J, Scardamalia M, Reznick R. Internet-based otolaryngology case discussions for medical students. J Otolaryngol. 2002;31:197–201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    McGrath D, Maulitz R, Baldwin CD. An active learning framework that delivers clinical education case studies on the web. Acad Med. 2001;76:548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chueh H, Barnett G. “Just-in-time” clinical information. Acad Med. 1997;72:512–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Baumlin KM, Bessette MJ, Lewis C, Richardson LD. EMCyber-School: an evaluation of computer-assisted instruction on the Internet. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:959–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cahill D, Cook J, Sithers A, Edwards J, Jenkins J. Evaluation of an online postgraduate education programme. Med Teach. 2002;24:425–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wood DF. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: problem based learning. BMJ. 2003;326:328–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wlodkowsi RJ. Strategies to enhance adult motivation to learn. In: Galbraith MW, ed. Adult Learning Methods: A Guide to Effective Instruction. 2nd ed. Malabar, Fla: Krieger Publishing Company; 1998;91–111.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Beasley BW, Kallail KJ, Walling AD, Davis N, Hudson L. Maximizing the use of a Web-based teaching skills curriculum for community-based volunteer faculty. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2001;21:158–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Miller AP, Haden P, Schwartz PL, Loten EG. Pilot studies of in-course assessment for a revised medical curriculum: II. Computer-based, individual. Acad Med. 1997;72:1113–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Morrison J. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: evaluation. BMJ. 2003;326:385–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cook DA, Dupras DM. Flexible teaching for inflexible schedules: an online resident curriculum in acute ambulatory care. Med Teach. 2003;25:330–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zucker S, White JA, Fabri PJ, Khonsari LS. Instructional intranets in graduate medical education. Acad Med. 1998;73:1072–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Harden R. Myths and e-learning. Med Teach. 2002;24:469–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Knowles MS, Holton EF III, Swanson RA. The Adult Learner. 5th ed. Woburn, Mass: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Baldwin 4-A, Department of MedicineMayo Clinic College of MedicineRochester

Personalised recommendations