OBJECTIVE: Online learning has changed medical education, but many “educational” websites do not employ principles of effective learning. This article will assist readers in developing effective educational websites by integrating principles of active learning with the unique features of the Web.
DESIGN: Narrative review.
RESULTS: The key steps in developing an effective educational website are: Perform a needs analysis and specify goals and objectives; determine technical resources and needs; evaluate preexisting software and use it if it fully meets your needs; secure commitment from all participants and identify and address potential barriers to implementation; develop content in close coordination with website design (appropriately use multimedia, hyperlinks, and online communication) and follow a timeline; encourage active learning (self-assessment, reflection, self-directed learning, problem-based learning, learner interaction, and feedback); facilitate and plan to encourage use by the learner (make website accessible and user-friendly, provide time for learning, and motivate learners); evaluate learners and course; pilot the website before full implementation; and plan to monitor online communication and maintain the site by resolving technical problems, periodically verifying hyperlinks, and regularly updating content.
CONCLUSION: Teaching on the Web involves more than putting together a colorful webpage. By consistently employing principles of effective learning, educators will unlock the full potential of Web-based medical education.
Internet medical education World Wide Web e-learning curriculum development
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Chumley-Jones HS, Dobbie A, Alford CL. Web-based learning: sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature. Acad Med. 2002;77(10 suppl):S86-S93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallgren RC, Parkhurst PE, Monson CL, Crewe NM. An interactive, Web-based tool for learning anatomic landmarks. Acad Med. 2002;77:263–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemper KJ, Amata-Kynvi A, Sanghavi D, et al. Randomized trial of an Internet curriculum on herbs and other dietary supplements for health care professionals. Acad Med. 2002;77:882–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spickard A III, Alrajeh N, Cordray D, Gigante J. Learning about screening using an online or live lecture: does it matter? J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:540–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamin C, O’Sullivan P, Deterding R, Younger M. A comparison of critical thinking in groups of third-year medical students in text, video, and virtual PBL case modalities. Acad Med. 2003;78:204–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell DS, Fonarow GC, Hays RD, Mangione CM. Self-study from web-based and printed guideline materials: a randomized, controlled trial among resident physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:938–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Grundman J, Wigton R, Nickol D. A controlled trial of an interactive, Web-based virtual reality program for teaching physical diagnosis skills to medical students. Acad Med. 2000;75(10 suppl):S47-S49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludlow JB, Platin E. A comparison of Web page and slide/tape for instruction in periapical and panoramic radiographic anatomy. J Dent Educ. 2000;64:269–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Santer D, Michaelsen V, Erkonen W, et al. A comparison of educational interventions. Multimedia textbook, standard lecture, and printed textbook. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:297–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Brooks DW. Web-teaching: A Guide to Designing Interactive Teaching for the World Wide Web. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1997.Google Scholar
Rosenberg MJ. E-learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2001.Google Scholar
Sekikawa A, Aaron DJ, Acosta B, Sa E, LaPorte RE. Does the perception of downloading speed influence the evaluation of web-based lectures? Public Health. 2001;115:152–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuh JL, Abbott AV, Ontai S. Pilot study of a rating instrument for medical education Web sites. Acad Med. 2000;75:290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman GM. Copyright in Cyberspace: Questions and Answers for Librarians. New York, NY: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.; 2001.Google Scholar
Ellenchild Pinch W, Graves J. Using web-based discussion as a teaching strategy: bioethics as an exemplar. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:704–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipman AJ, Sade RM, Glotzbach AL, Lancaster CJ, Marshall MF. The incremental value of Internet-based instruction as an adjunct to classroom instruction: a prospective randomized study. Acad Med. 2001;76:1060–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinert Y, McLeod P, Conochie L, Nasmith L. An online discussion for medical faculty: an experiment that failed. Acad Med. 2002;77:939–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha V, Duffy S. Ten golden rules for designing software in medical education: results from a formative evaluation of DIALOG. Med Teach. 2002;24:417–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krug S. Don’t Make Me Think! A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability. Indianapolis, Ind: Macmillan USA; 2000.Google Scholar
The National Cancer Institute. Usability.gov: improving the communication of cancer research; Available at: http://usability.gov. Accessed June 4, 2003.Google Scholar
Meyers C, Jones TB. Promoting active learning: strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass Inc.; 1993.Google Scholar
Kaufman DM. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: applying educational theory in practice. BMJ. 2003;326:213–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papa FJ, Aldrich D, Schumacker RE. The effects of immediate online feedback upon diagnostic performance. Acad Med. 1999;74(10 suppl):S16-S18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis P, Holford J, Griffin C. The Theory and Practice of Learning. London, UK: Kogan Page Limited; 1998.Google Scholar
Leong SL, Baldwin CD, Adelman AM. Integrating Web-based computer cases into a required clerkship: development and evaluation. Acad Med. 2003;78:295–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dornan T, Lee C, Stopford A. Skills base: a Web-based electronic learning portfolio for clinical skills. Acad Med. 2001;76:542–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr M, Hewitt J, Scardamalia M, Reznick R. Internet-based otolaryngology case discussions for medical students. J Otolaryngol. 2002;31:197–201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
McGrath D, Maulitz R, Baldwin CD. An active learning framework that delivers clinical education case studies on the web. Acad Med. 2001;76:548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlodkowsi RJ. Strategies to enhance adult motivation to learn. In: Galbraith MW, ed. Adult Learning Methods: A Guide to Effective Instruction. 2nd ed. Malabar, Fla: Krieger Publishing Company; 1998;91–111.Google Scholar
Beasley BW, Kallail KJ, Walling AD, Davis N, Hudson L. Maximizing the use of a Web-based teaching skills curriculum for community-based volunteer faculty. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2001;21:158–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller AP, Haden P, Schwartz PL, Loten EG. Pilot studies of in-course assessment for a revised medical curriculum: II. Computer-based, individual. Acad Med. 1997;72:1113–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar