Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 251–258 | Cite as

A national survey of U.S. internists’ experiences with ethical dilemmas and ethics consultation

  • Gordon DuVal
  • Brian Clarridge
  • Gary Gensler
  • Marion Danis
Original Articles


OBJECTIVE: To identify the ethical dilemmas that internists encounter, the strategies they use to address them, and the usefulness of ethics consultation.

DESIGN: National telephone survey.

SETTING: Doctors’ offices.

PARTICIPANTS: General internists, oncologists, and critical care/pulmonologists (N=344, 64% response rate).

MEASUREMENTS: Types of ethical dilemmas recently encountered and likelihood of requesting ethics consultation: satisfaction with resolution of ethical dilemmas with and without ethics consultation.

RESULTS: Internists most commonly reported dilemmas regarding end-of-life decision making, patient autonomy, justice, and conflict resolution. General internists, oncologists, and critical care specialists reported participating in an average of 1.4, 1.3, and 4.1 consultations in the preceding 2 years, respectively (P<.0001). Physicians with the least ethics training had the least access to and participated in the fewest ethics consultations; 19% reported consultation was unavailable at their predominant practice site. Dilemmas about end-of-life decisions and patient autonomy were often referred for consultation, while dilemmas about justice, such as lack of insurance or limited resources, were rarely referred. While most physicians thought consultations yielded information that would be useful in dealing with future ethical dilemmas (72%), some hesitated to seek ethics consultation because they believed it was too time consuming (29%), might make the situation worse (15%), or that consultants were unqualified (11%).

CONCLUSIONS: While most internists recall recent ethical dilemmas in their practices, those with the least preparation and experience have the least access to ethics consultation. Health care organizations should emphasize ethics educational activities to prepare physicians for handling ethical dilemmas on their own and should improve the accessibility and responsiveness of ethics consultation when needed.

Key Words

questionnaires internal medicine ethics clinical ethicists referral and consultation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lo B, Schroeder S. Frequency of ethical dilemmas in a medical inpatient service. Arch Intern Med. 1981;141:1062–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Connelly J, DalleMura S. Ethical problems in the medical office. J Am Med Assoc. 1988;260:812–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Purtilo R. Ethics consultation in the hospital. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:983–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    La Puma J. The clinical ethicist at the bedside. Theor Med. 1991;12:141–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singer P, Pelegrino E, Siegler M. Ethics committees and consultants. J Clin Ethics. 1990;1:263–7.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Organizations JCfAoH. 2000 Hospital Accreditation Standards. Oakbrook Terrace, Ill: Joint Commission; 1999.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ausilio M, Arnold R, Youngner S. Health care ethics consultation: nature, goals, and competencies. A position paper from the Society for Health and Human Values-Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:59–69.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Day J. An assessment of a formal ethics committee consultation process. HEC Forum. 1994;6:18–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    La Puma J. Community hospital ethics consultation: evaluation and comparison with a university hospital service. Am J Med. 1992;92:346–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    La Puma J. An ethics consultation service in a teaching hospital. Utilization and evaluation. J Am Med Assoc. 1988;260:808–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Orr R, Moon E. Effectiveness of an ethics consultation service. J Fam Pract. 1993;36:49–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Orr R. Evaluation of an ethics consultation service: patient and family perspective. Am J Med. 1996;101:135–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McClung J. Evaluation of a medical ethics consultation service: opinions of patients and health care providers. Am J Med. 1996;100:456–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schneiderman L, Gilmer T, Teetzel H. Impact of ethics consultation in the intensive care setting: randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:3920–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dowdy M, Robertson C, Bander J. A study of proactive ethics consultation for critically and terminally ill patients with extended lengths of stay. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:252–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schneiderman LJ, Gilmer T, Teetzel HD, et al. Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290:1166–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sinnott-Armstrong W. Moral Dilemmas. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell, INC; 1988.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fowler FJ. Improving Survey Questions: Design and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1995.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sirken M, Hermann D, Schechter S, Schwarz N, Tanur J, Tourangeau R, eds. Cognition and Survey Research. New York, NY: Wiley Publishers; 1999.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arnold R. Teaching clinical medical ethics: a model programme for primary care residency. J Med Ethics. 1988;14:91–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Loewy E. Teaching medical ethics during residency. J Med Educ. 1986;61:661–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Perkins H. Teaching medical ethics during residency. Acad Med. 1989;64:262–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perkins H, Geppert C, Hazuda H. Challenges in teaching medical ethics in medical schools. Am J Med Sci. 2000;319:273–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Howe K. Medical students’ evaluations of different levels of medical ethics teaching: implications for curricula. Med Educ. 1987;21:340–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jacobson J. Internal medicine residents’ preferences regarding medical ethics education. Acad Med. 1989;64:760–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jennett P, Crelinsten G, Kinsella T. Advanced training in biomedical ethics: a curriculum in clinical specialty programmes. Med Educ. 1993;27:484–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fletcher J, Siegler M. What are the goals of ethics consultation? A consensus statement. J Clin Ethics. 1996;7:122–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Casserett D, Daskel F, Lantos J. The authority of the clinical ethicist. Hastings Cent Rep. 1988;28:6–11.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Walker M. Keeping moral open space: New images of ethics consulting. Hastings Cent Rep. 1993;23:33–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Spike J, Greenlaw J. Ethics consultation: high ideals or unrealistic expectations. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:55–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Association AM. Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the U.S. 2000/2001. Chicago, Ill: AMA; 2001.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Asch D, Jedrziewski M, Christakis N. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Field T, Cadoret C, Brown M, et al. Surveying physicians: do components of the ‘Total Design Approach’ to optimizing survey response rates apply to physicians? Med Care. 2002;40:596–605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gordon DuVal
    • 1
  • Brian Clarridge
    • 2
  • Gary Gensler
    • 3
  • Marion Danis
    • 4
  1. 1.Joint Centre for BioethicsReceived from the University of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.University of MassachusettsBoston
  3. 3.EMMES CorporationRockville
  4. 4.Department of Clinical BioethicsNational Institutes of HealthBethesda

Personalised recommendations