Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 43–50 | Cite as

Use of mind-body medical therapies

Results of a national survey
  • Peter M. Wolsko
  • David M. Eisenberg
  • Roger B. Davis
  • Russell S. Phillips
Original Articles

Abstract

OBJECT: Research demonstrating connections between the mind and body has increased interest in the potential of mind-body therapies. Our aim was to examine the use of mind-body therapies, using data available from a national survey.

DESIGN: Analysis of a large nationally representative dataset that comprehensively evaluated the use of mind-body therapies in the last year.

SETTING: United States households.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2,055 American adults in 1997–1998.

INTERVENTIONS: Random national telephone survey.

MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS: We obtained a 60% weighted overall response rate among eligible respondents. We found that 18.9% of adults had used at least 1 mind-body therapy in the last year, with 20.5% of these therapies involving visits to a mind-body professional. Meditation, imagery, and yoga were the most commonly used techniques. Factors independently and positively associated with the use of mind-body therapies in the last year were being 40 to 49 years old (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33 to 3.10), being not married (AOR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.34 to 2.36), having an educational level of college or greater (AOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.57 to 3.09), having used self-prayer for a medical concern (AOR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.87 to 3.42), and having used another complementary medicine therapy in the last year (AOR, 3.77; 95% CI, 2.74 to 5.20). While used for the full array of medical conditions, they were used infrequently for chronic pain (used by 20% of those with chronic pain) and insomnia (used by 13% of those with insomnia), conditions for which consensus panels have concluded that mind-body therapies are effective. They were also used by less than 20% of those with heart disease, headaches, back or neck pain, and cancer, conditions for which there is strong research support. Mind-body therapies were generally used concomitantly with conventional care: 90% of those using a mind-body therapy in the last year had seen a physician and 80% of mind-body therapies used were discussed with a physician.

CONCLUSIONS: Although mind-body therapies were commonly used, much opportunity exists to increase use of mind-body therapies for indications with demonstrated efficacy.

Key words

evidence-based medicine mind-body self-care utilization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–97: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA. 1998;280:1569–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wootton JC, Sparber A. Surveys of complementary and alternative medicine: part I. General trends and demographic groups. J Altern Complement Med. 2001;7:195–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Mcguire L, Robles TF, Glaser R. Psychoneuro-immunology and psychosomatic medicine: back to the future. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:15–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stefano GB, Fricchione GL, Slingsby BT, Benson H. The placebo effect and relaxation response: neural processes and their coupling to constitutive nitric oxide. Brain Res Rev. 2001;35:1–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sobel DS. Mind matters, money matters: the cost-effectiveness of mind-body medicine. JAMA. 2000;284:1705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sobel DS. The cost-effectiveness of mind-body medicine interventions. Prog Brain Res. 2000;122:393–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friedman R, Sobel D, Myers P, Caudill M, Benson H. Behavioral medicine, clinical health psychology, and cost offset. Health Psychol. 1995;14:509–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    NIH Consensus Statement: Integration of Behavioral and Relaxation Approaches into the Treatment of Chronic Pain and Insomnia. Available at: http://odp.od.nih.gov/consensus/ta/017/017_statement.htm. Accessed 5/8/02.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NIH). Available at: http://nccam.nih.gov/fcp/classify/index.html. Accessed 4/28/02.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Astin JA, Shapiro SL, Eisenberg DM, Forys KL. Mind-body medicine: state of the science, implications for practice. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003;16:131–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Corbin Winslow L, Shapiro H. Physicians want education about complementary and alternative medicine to enhance communication with their patients. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1176–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller JJ, Fletcher K, Kabat-Zinn J. Three-year follow-up and clinical implications of a mindfulness meditation-based stress reduction intervention in the treatment of anxiety disorders. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1995;17:192–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lang EV, Benotsch EG, Fick LJ, et al. Adjunctive non-pharmacological analgesia for invasive medical procedures: a randomized trial. Lancet. 2000;355:1486–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Domar AD, Seibel MM, Benson H. The mind/body program for infertility: a new behavioral treatment approach for women with infertility. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:246–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smyth JM, Stone AA, Hurewitz A, Kaell A. Effects of writing about stressful experiences on symptom reduction in patients with asthma or rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999;281:1304–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blendon RJ, Desroches CM, Benson JM, Brodie M, Altman DE. Americans’ views on the use and regulation of dietary supplements. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:805–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eisenberg DM. Advising patients who seek alternative medical therapies. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:61–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Valli G. Giardina EG. Benefits, adverse effects and drug interactions of herbal therapies with cardiovascular effects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1083–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ernst E. The risk-benefit profile of commonly used herbal therapies: Ginkgo, St. John’s Wort, Ginseng, Echinacea, Saw Palmetto, and Kava. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:42–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ernst E. Harmless herbs? A review of the recent literature. Am J Med. 1998;104:170–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lewis JD, Strom BL. Balancing safety of dietary supplements with the free market. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:616–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kava R, Meister KA, Whelan EM, Lukachko AM, Mirabile C. Dietary supplement safety information in magazines popular among older readers. J Health Commun. 2002;7:13–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    USFDA Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Dietary Supplements. Available at: http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/%7Edms/supplmnt.html. Accessed 5/10/02.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Piscitelli SC, Burstein AH, Chaitt D, Alfaro RM, Falloon J. Indinavir concentrations and St. John’s wort. Lancet. 2000;355:547–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Davidoff F. Weighing the alternatives: lessons from the paradoxes of alternative medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:1068–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shine KI. A critique on complementary and alternative medicine. J Altern Complement Med. 2001;7(suppl):S145-S52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mccaffrey A, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Phillips RS. Use of prayer and distant healing: results of a national survey. Abstract Presentation. Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Ga, May 3, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter M. Wolsko
    • 1
  • David M. Eisenberg
    • 1
  • Roger B. Davis
    • 2
  • Russell S. Phillips
    • 2
  1. 1.the Division for Research and Education in Complementary and Integrative Medical TherapiesHarvard Medical SchoolBoston
  2. 2.Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBoston

Personalised recommendations