Use of mind-body medical therapies
Results of a national survey
OBJECT: Research demonstrating connections between the mind and body has increased interest in the potential of mind-body therapies. Our aim was to examine the use of mind-body therapies, using data available from a national survey.
DESIGN: Analysis of a large nationally representative dataset that comprehensively evaluated the use of mind-body therapies in the last year.
SETTING: United States households.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2,055 American adults in 1997–1998.
INTERVENTIONS: Random national telephone survey.
MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS: We obtained a 60% weighted overall response rate among eligible respondents. We found that 18.9% of adults had used at least 1 mind-body therapy in the last year, with 20.5% of these therapies involving visits to a mind-body professional. Meditation, imagery, and yoga were the most commonly used techniques. Factors independently and positively associated with the use of mind-body therapies in the last year were being 40 to 49 years old (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33 to 3.10), being not married (AOR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.34 to 2.36), having an educational level of college or greater (AOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.57 to 3.09), having used self-prayer for a medical concern (AOR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.87 to 3.42), and having used another complementary medicine therapy in the last year (AOR, 3.77; 95% CI, 2.74 to 5.20). While used for the full array of medical conditions, they were used infrequently for chronic pain (used by 20% of those with chronic pain) and insomnia (used by 13% of those with insomnia), conditions for which consensus panels have concluded that mind-body therapies are effective. They were also used by less than 20% of those with heart disease, headaches, back or neck pain, and cancer, conditions for which there is strong research support. Mind-body therapies were generally used concomitantly with conventional care: 90% of those using a mind-body therapy in the last year had seen a physician and 80% of mind-body therapies used were discussed with a physician.
CONCLUSIONS: Although mind-body therapies were commonly used, much opportunity exists to increase use of mind-body therapies for indications with demonstrated efficacy.
Key wordsevidence-based medicine mind-body self-care utilization
Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–97: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA. 1998;280:1569–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootton JC, Sparber A. Surveys of complementary and alternative medicine: part I. General trends and demographic groups. J Altern Complement Med. 2001;7:195–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Mcguire L, Robles TF, Glaser R. Psychoneuro-immunology and psychosomatic medicine: back to the future. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:15–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Stefano GB, Fricchione GL, Slingsby BT, Benson H. The placebo effect and relaxation response: neural processes and their coupling to constitutive nitric oxide. Brain Res Rev. 2001;35:1–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel DS. Mind matters, money matters: the cost-effectiveness of mind-body medicine. JAMA. 2000;284:1705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel DS. The cost-effectiveness of mind-body medicine interventions. Prog Brain Res. 2000;122:393–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman R, Sobel D, Myers P, Caudill M, Benson H. Behavioral medicine, clinical health psychology, and cost offset. Health Psychol. 1995;14:509–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
NIH Consensus Statement: Integration of Behavioral and Relaxation Approaches into the Treatment of Chronic Pain and Insomnia. Available at: http://odp.od.nih.gov/consensus/ta/017/017_statement.htm. Accessed 5/8/02.Google Scholar
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NIH). Available at: http://nccam.nih.gov/fcp/classify/index.html. Accessed 4/28/02.Google Scholar
Astin JA, Shapiro SL, Eisenberg DM, Forys KL. Mind-body medicine: state of the science, implications for practice. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003;16:131–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin Winslow L, Shapiro H. Physicians want education about complementary and alternative medicine to enhance communication with their patients. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1176–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller JJ, Fletcher K, Kabat-Zinn J. Three-year follow-up and clinical implications of a mindfulness meditation-based stress reduction intervention in the treatment of anxiety disorders. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1995;17:192–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang EV, Benotsch EG, Fick LJ, et al. Adjunctive non-pharmacological analgesia for invasive medical procedures: a randomized trial. Lancet. 2000;355:1486–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domar AD, Seibel MM, Benson H. The mind/body program for infertility: a new behavioral treatment approach for women with infertility. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:246–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Smyth JM, Stone AA, Hurewitz A, Kaell A. Effects of writing about stressful experiences on symptom reduction in patients with asthma or rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999;281:1304–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blendon RJ, Desroches CM, Benson JM, Brodie M, Altman DE. Americans’ views on the use and regulation of dietary supplements. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:805–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg DM. Advising patients who seek alternative medical therapies. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:61–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Valli G. Giardina EG. Benefits, adverse effects and drug interactions of herbal therapies with cardiovascular effects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1083–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst E. The risk-benefit profile of commonly used herbal therapies: Ginkgo, St. John’s Wort, Ginseng, Echinacea, Saw Palmetto, and Kava. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:42–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ernst E. Harmless herbs? A review of the recent literature. Am J Med. 1998;104:170–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis JD, Strom BL. Balancing safety of dietary supplements with the free market. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:616–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kava R, Meister KA, Whelan EM, Lukachko AM, Mirabile C. Dietary supplement safety information in magazines popular among older readers. J Health Commun. 2002;7:13–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
USFDA Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Dietary Supplements. Available at: http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/%7Edms/supplmnt.html. Accessed 5/10/02.Google Scholar
Piscitelli SC, Burstein AH, Chaitt D, Alfaro RM, Falloon J. Indinavir concentrations and St. John’s wort. Lancet. 2000;355:547–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidoff F. Weighing the alternatives: lessons from the paradoxes of alternative medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:1068–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Shine KI. A critique on complementary and alternative medicine. J Altern Complement Med. 2001;7(suppl):S145-S52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccaffrey A, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Phillips RS. Use of prayer and distant healing: results of a national survey. Abstract Presentation. Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Ga, May 3, 2002.Google Scholar
© Society of General Internal Medicine 2004