Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 16, Issue 10, pp 675–684 | Cite as

Managed care, professional autonomy, and income

Effects on physician career satisfaction
  • Jeffrey J. StoddardEmail author
  • J. Lee Hargraves
  • Marie Reed
  • Alison Vratil
Original Articles

Abstract

CONTEXT: Career satisfaction among physicians is a topic of importance to physicians in practice, physicians in training, health system administrators, physician organization executives, and consumers. The level of career satisfaction derived by physicians from their work is a basic yet essential element in the functioning of the health care system.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the degree to which professional autonomy, compensation, and managed care are determinants of career satisfaction among physicians.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis using data from 1996–97 Community Tracking Study physician telephone survey.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative sample of 12,385 direct patient care physicians. The survey response rate was 65%.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Overall career satisfaction among U.S. physicians.

RESULTS: Bivariate results show that physicians with low managed care revenues are significantly more likely to be “very satisfied” than are physicians with high managed care revenue (P<.05), and that physicians with low managed care revenues are significantly more likely to report higher levels of clinical freedom than are physicians with high managed care revenue (P<.05). Multivariate analyses demonstrate that, among our measures, traditional core professional values and autonomy are the most important determinants of career satisfaction after controlling for all other factors. Relative income is also an important independent predictor. Multiple dimensions of professional autonomy hold up as strong, independent predictors of career satisfaction, while the effect of managed care does not. Managed care appears to exert its effect on satisfaction through its impact on professional autonomy, not through income reduction.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that when managed care (or other influences) erode professional autonomy, the result is a highly negative impact on physician career satisfaction.

Key words

physician career satisfaction professional autonomy managed care income 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Melville A. Job satisfaction in general practice: implications for prescribing. Soc Sci Med. 1980;14A:495–9.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    DiMatteo MR, Sherbourne CD, Hays RD, et al. Physicians’ characteristics influence patients’ adherence to medical treatment: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Health Psychol. 1993;12:93–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Linn LS, Yager J, Cope D, Leake B. Health status, job satisfaction, job stress, and life satisfaction among academic and clinical faculty. JAMA. 1985;254:2775–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haas JS, Cook EF, Puopolo AL, Burstin HR, Cleary PD, Brennan TA. Is the professional satisfaction of general internists associated with patient satisfaction? J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:122–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Comarow A. America’s top HMOs. Behind the HMO rankings. Our second set of ratings covers 223 plans in 46 states. US News and World Report. October 13, 1997:68.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buchbinder SB, Wilson M, Melick CF, Powe NR. Estimates of costs of primary care physician turnover. Am J Manag Care. 1999;5:1431–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baker LC, Cantor JC. Physician satisfaction under managed care. Health Aff. 1993;12:258–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kerr EA, Hays RD, Mittman BS, Siu AL, Leake BL, Brook RH. Primary care physicians’ satisfaction with quality of care in California capitated medical groups. JAMA. 1997;278:308–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hadley J, Mitchell JM. Effects of HMO market penetration on physicians’ work effort and satisfaction. Health Aff. 1997;16:99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grumbach K, Osmond D, Vranizan K, Jaffe D, Bindman AB. Primary care physicians’ experience of financial incentives in managed-care systems. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1516–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schulz R, Scheckler WE, Moberg DP, Johnson PR. Changing nature of physician satisfaction with health maintenance organization and fee-for-service practices. J Fam Pract. 1997;45:321–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Warren MG, Weitz R, Kulis S. Physician satisfaction in a changing health care environment: the impact of challenges to professional autonomy, authority, and dominance. J Health Soc Behav. 1998;39:356–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Linzer M, Konrad TR, Douglas J, et al. Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the physician worklife study. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:441–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Warren MG, Weitz R, Kulis S. The impact of managed care on physicians. Health Care Manage Rev. 1999;24:44–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hadley J, Mitchell JM, Sulmasy DP, Bloche MG. Perceived financial incentives, HMO market penetration, and physicians’ practice styles and satisfaction. Health Serv Res. 1999;34:307–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Donelan K, Blendon RJ, Lundberg GD, et al. The new medical marketplace: physicians’ views. Health Aff. 1997;16:139–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bates AS, Harris LE, Tierney WM, Wolinsky FD. Dimensions and correlates of physician work satisfaction in a midwestern city. Med Care. 1998;36:610–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lewis JM, Barnhart FD, Howard BL, Carson DI, Nace EP. Work satisfaction in the lives of physicians. Tex Med. 1993;89:54–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schulz R, Girard C, Scheckler WE. Physician satisfaction in a managed care environment. J Fam Pract. 1992;34:298–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chuck JM, Nesbitt TS, Kwan J, Kam SM. Is being a doctor still fun? West J Med. 1993;159:665–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ludmerer KM. Instilling professionalism in medical education. JAMA. 1999;282:881–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Freidson E. Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press; 1988.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Swick HM, Szenas P, Danoff D, Whitcomb ME. Teaching professionalism in undergraduate medical education. JAMA. 1999;282:830–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Halvorsen JG. Professionalism reconsidered. Priorities for physicians. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:173–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barry D, Cyran E, Anderson RJ. Common issues in medical professionalism: room to grow. Am J Med. 2000;108:136–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wynia MK, Latham SR, Kao AC, Berg JW, Emanuel LL. Medical professionalism in society. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1612–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reynolds PP. Reaffirming professionalism through the education community. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:609–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Konrad TR, Williams ES, Linzer M, et al. Measuring physician job satisfaction in a changing workplace and a challenging environment. SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. Society of General Internal Medicine. Med Care. 1999;37:1174–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Williams ES, Konrad TR, Linzer M, et al. Refining the measurement of physician job satisfaction: results from the Physician Worklife Survey. SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. Society of General Internal Medicine. Med Care. 1999; 37:1140–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kemper P, Blumenthal D, Corrigan JM, et al. The design of the Community Tracking Study: a longitudinal study of health system change and its effects on people. Inquiry. 1996;33:195–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Metcalf CE, Kemper P, Kohn LT, Pickreign JD. Site Definition and Sample Design for the Community Tracking Study. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 1996. (Technical Publication No. 1.)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Keil L, Chattopadhyay M, Potter F, Reed MC. Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round 1 Survey Methodology Report. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 1998. (Technical Publication No. 9).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Reschovsky JD, Edson D, Sewall A, et al. Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Public Use File: Users’ Guide (Round One, Release 1). Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 1998. (Technical Publication No. 10.)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cunningham PJ, Grossman JM, St Peter RF, Lesser CS. Managed care and physicians’ provision of charity care. JAMA. 1999;281:1087–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhang J, Yu KF. What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA. 1998;280:1690–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hilzenrath D. HMO to Leave Care Decisions Up to Doctors. Washington Post. November 9, 1999:A1.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Freudenheim M. Big HMO to Give Decisions on Care Back to Doctors. New York Times. November 9, 1999.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jacobson PD, Pomfret SD. ERISA litigation and physician autonomy. JAMA. 2000;283:921–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Blackwell Science Inc 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey J. Stoddard
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. Lee Hargraves
    • 1
  • Marie Reed
    • 1
  • Alison Vratil
    • 1
  1. 1.the Center for Studying Health System ChangeWashington, D.C.

Personalised recommendations