CONTEXT: Career satisfaction among physicians is a topic of importance to physicians in practice, physicians in training, health system administrators, physician organization executives, and consumers. The level of career satisfaction derived by physicians from their work is a basic yet essential element in the functioning of the health care system.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the degree to which professional autonomy, compensation, and managed care are determinants of career satisfaction among physicians.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis using data from 1996–97 Community Tracking Study physician telephone survey.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative sample of 12,385 direct patient care physicians. The survey response rate was 65%.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Overall career satisfaction among U.S. physicians.
RESULTS: Bivariate results show that physicians with low managed care revenues are significantly more likely to be “very satisfied” than are physicians with high managed care revenue (P<.05), and that physicians with low managed care revenues are significantly more likely to report higher levels of clinical freedom than are physicians with high managed care revenue (P<.05). Multivariate analyses demonstrate that, among our measures, traditional core professional values and autonomy are the most important determinants of career satisfaction after controlling for all other factors. Relative income is also an important independent predictor. Multiple dimensions of professional autonomy hold up as strong, independent predictors of career satisfaction, while the effect of managed care does not. Managed care appears to exert its effect on satisfaction through its impact on professional autonomy, not through income reduction.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that when managed care (or other influences) erode professional autonomy, the result is a highly negative impact on physician career satisfaction.
physician career satisfaction professional autonomy managed care income
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Melville A. Job satisfaction in general practice: implications for prescribing. Soc Sci Med. 1980;14A:495–9.Google Scholar
DiMatteo MR, Sherbourne CD, Hays RD, et al. Physicians’ characteristics influence patients’ adherence to medical treatment: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Health Psychol. 1993;12:93–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linn LS, Yager J, Cope D, Leake B. Health status, job satisfaction, job stress, and life satisfaction among academic and clinical faculty. JAMA. 1985;254:2775–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas JS, Cook EF, Puopolo AL, Burstin HR, Cleary PD, Brennan TA. Is the professional satisfaction of general internists associated with patient satisfaction? J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:122–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comarow A. America’s top HMOs. Behind the HMO rankings. Our second set of ratings covers 223 plans in 46 states. US News and World Report. October 13, 1997:68.Google Scholar
Buchbinder SB, Wilson M, Melick CF, Powe NR. Estimates of costs of primary care physician turnover. Am J Manag Care. 1999;5:1431–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Baker LC, Cantor JC. Physician satisfaction under managed care. Health Aff. 1993;12:258–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr EA, Hays RD, Mittman BS, Siu AL, Leake BL, Brook RH. Primary care physicians’ satisfaction with quality of care in California capitated medical groups. JAMA. 1997;278:308–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadley J, Mitchell JM. Effects of HMO market penetration on physicians’ work effort and satisfaction. Health Aff. 1997;16:99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grumbach K, Osmond D, Vranizan K, Jaffe D, Bindman AB. Primary care physicians’ experience of financial incentives in managed-care systems. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1516–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz R, Scheckler WE, Moberg DP, Johnson PR. Changing nature of physician satisfaction with health maintenance organization and fee-for-service practices. J Fam Pract. 1997;45:321–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Warren MG, Weitz R, Kulis S. Physician satisfaction in a changing health care environment: the impact of challenges to professional autonomy, authority, and dominance. J Health Soc Behav. 1998;39:356–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linzer M, Konrad TR, Douglas J, et al. Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the physician worklife study. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:441–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren MG, Weitz R, Kulis S. The impact of managed care on physicians. Health Care Manage Rev. 1999;24:44–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hadley J, Mitchell JM, Sulmasy DP, Bloche MG. Perceived financial incentives, HMO market penetration, and physicians’ practice styles and satisfaction. Health Serv Res. 1999;34:307–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Donelan K, Blendon RJ, Lundberg GD, et al. The new medical marketplace: physicians’ views. Health Aff. 1997;16:139–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates AS, Harris LE, Tierney WM, Wolinsky FD. Dimensions and correlates of physician work satisfaction in a midwestern city. Med Care. 1998;36:610–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis JM, Barnhart FD, Howard BL, Carson DI, Nace EP. Work satisfaction in the lives of physicians. Tex Med. 1993;89:54–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Schulz R, Girard C, Scheckler WE. Physician satisfaction in a managed care environment. J Fam Pract. 1992;34:298–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Chuck JM, Nesbitt TS, Kwan J, Kam SM. Is being a doctor still fun? West J Med. 1993;159:665–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Barry D, Cyran E, Anderson RJ. Common issues in medical professionalism: room to grow. Am J Med. 2000;108:136–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynia MK, Latham SR, Kao AC, Berg JW, Emanuel LL. Medical professionalism in society. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1612–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds PP. Reaffirming professionalism through the education community. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:609–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Konrad TR, Williams ES, Linzer M, et al. Measuring physician job satisfaction in a changing workplace and a challenging environment. SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. Society of General Internal Medicine. Med Care. 1999;37:1174–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams ES, Konrad TR, Linzer M, et al. Refining the measurement of physician job satisfaction: results from the Physician Worklife Survey. SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. Society of General Internal Medicine. Med Care. 1999; 37:1140–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemper P, Blumenthal D, Corrigan JM, et al. The design of the Community Tracking Study: a longitudinal study of health system change and its effects on people. Inquiry. 1996;33:195–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Metcalf CE, Kemper P, Kohn LT, Pickreign JD. Site Definition and Sample Design for the Community Tracking Study. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 1996. (Technical Publication No. 1.)Google Scholar
Keil L, Chattopadhyay M, Potter F, Reed MC. Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round 1 Survey Methodology Report. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 1998. (Technical Publication No. 9).Google Scholar
Reschovsky JD, Edson D, Sewall A, et al. Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Public Use File: Users’ Guide (Round One, Release 1). Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 1998. (Technical Publication No. 10.)Google Scholar
Cunningham PJ, Grossman JM, St Peter RF, Lesser CS. Managed care and physicians’ provision of charity care. JAMA. 1999;281:1087–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.Google Scholar
Zhang J, Yu KF. What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA. 1998;280:1690–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilzenrath D. HMO to Leave Care Decisions Up to Doctors. Washington Post. November 9, 1999:A1.Google Scholar
Freudenheim M. Big HMO to Give Decisions on Care Back to Doctors. New York Times. November 9, 1999.Google Scholar