Productivity, quality, and patient satisfaction
Comparison of part-time and full-time primary care physicians
CONTEXT: Although few data are available, many believe that part-time primary care physicians (PCPs) are less productive and provide lower quality care than full-time PCPs. Some insurers exclude part-time PCPs from their provider networks.
OBJECTIVE: To compare productivity, quality of preventive care, patient satisfaction, and risk-adjusted resource utilization of part-time and full-time PCPs.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
PARTICIPANTS: PCPs affiliated with 2 academic outpatient primary care networks.
MEASUREMENTS: PCP productivity, patient satisfaction, resource utilization, and compliance with screening guidelines.
RESULTS: Part-time PCP productivity was greater than that of full-time PCPs (2.1 work relative value units (RVUs)/bookable clinical hour versus 1.3 work RVUs/bookable clinical hour, P<.01). A similar proportion of part-time PCPs (80%) and full-time PCPs (75%) met targets for mammography, Pap smears, and cholesterol screening (P=.67). After adjusting for clinical case mix, practice location, gender, board certification status, and years in practice, resource utilization of part-time PCPs ($138 [95% confidence interval (CI), $108 to $167]) was similar to that of full-time PCPs ($139 [95% CI, $108 to $170], P = .92). Patient satisfaction was similar for part-time and full-time PCPs.
CONCLUSIONS: In these academic primary care practices, rates of patient satisfaction, compliance with screening guidelines, and resource utilization were similar for part-time PCPs compared to full-time PCPs. Productivity per clinical hour was markedly higher for part-time PCPs. Despite study limitations, these data suggest that academic part-time PCPs are at least as efficient as full-time PCPs and that the quality of their work is similar.
Key wordsproductivity quality of care patient satisfaction part-time physicians women in medicine
Fritz NE, Lantos JD. Pediatricans’ practice choices: differences between part-time and full-time practice. Pediatrics. 1991;88:764–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Heins M, Smock S, Jacobs J, Stein M. Productivity of women physicians. JAMA. 1976;236:1961–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nonnemaker L. Women physicians in academic medicine. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:399–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson W, Kaufman K, Bickel J. Part-time faculty in academic medicine: present status and future challenges. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:220–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Goldman L. Blueprint for a research career in general internal medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:341–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimond EG. Women in medicine: two points of view. I. The future of women physicians. JAMA. 1983;249:207–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning C. Are part time doctors better doctors? Continuity of care is likely to suffer. BMJ. 1998;316:1170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc. HMO Blue primary care physician agreement. 12/96.Google Scholar
Agreement between Neighborhood Health Plan of Rhode Island and participating practitioner group (PPG). Final PPG agreement 10/28/97.Google Scholar
Jollis JG, DeLong ER, Peterson ED, et al. Outcome of acute myocardial infarction according to the specialty of the admitting physician. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1880–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaste M, Palomaki H, Sarna S. Where and how should elderly stroke patients be treated? A randomized trial. Stroke. 1995;26:249–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Freund DA, Stein J, Hurley R, Engel W, Woomert A, Lee BI. Specialty differences in the treatment of asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989;84:401–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward MM, Leigh P, Fried JF. Progression of functional disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2229–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey TS, Garrett J, Jackman A, McLaughlin C, Fryer J, Smucker DR. The outcomes of care for acute low back pain among patients seen by primary care practitioners, chiropractors, and orthopedic surgeons. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:913–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield S, Rogers W, Mangotich M, Carney MF, Tarlov AR. Outcomes of patients with hypertension and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus treated by different systems and specialties. JAMA. 1995;274:1436–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fein OT, Garfield R. Impact of physicians’ part-time status on inpatients’ use of medical care and their satisfaction with physicians in an academic group practice. Acad Med. 1991;66:694–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teich JM, Glaser JP, Beckley RF, et al. Toward cost-effective, quality care: The Brigham Integrated Computing System. Proc. 2nd Nicholas E. Davies CPR Recognition Symposium. Washington DC: Computerized Patient Record Institute; 1996:3–34.Google Scholar
Hsiao WC, Braun P, Dunn DL, et al. An overview of the development and refinement of the resource-based relative value scale. Med Care. 1992;30:NS1-NS12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin H, Gandek B, Roger W, Kosinski M, McHorney C, Ware J. Patients’ ratings of outpatient visits in different practice settings: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1993;270:835–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starfield B, Weiner J, Mumford L, Steinwachs D. Ambulatory care groups: a categorization of diagnoses for research and management. Health Serv Res. 1991;26(1):53–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Dunevitz B. Physicians working longer, harder, but for more pay. Med Group Manag. 1999;38:1–2.Google Scholar
Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986;42:121–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason NA, Perry WR, Ryan ML. Alternative work schedules for female pharmacists. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1991;48:85–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Wheeler R, Candib L, Martin M. Part-time doctors: Reduced working hours for primary care physicians. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1990;45:47–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
© Blackwell Science Inc 2001