Anatomical Science International

, Volume 83, Issue 4, pp 294–297 | Cite as

Architecture and fiber type of the pyramidalis muscle

Case Report


The paired pyramidalis muscles are small triangular-shaped muscles that lie between the anterior surface of the rectus abdominus and the posterior surface of the rectus sheath. The precise function of pyramidalis muscles is unclear, but together the muscles are thought to tense the linea alba. The muscles are not always present, or are often unilateral, and vary greatly in size. Their wider inferior margins attach to the pubic symphyses and pubic crests, whereas their narrow superior margins attach to the linea alba. The gross anatomy and innervation of the pyramidalis muscles has been described by others, but their architecture and fiber type have not been determined in previous publications. The purpose of the present paper was therefore to investigate these parameters and place the findings into context for the literature available on this muscle. An example of bilateral pyramidalis muscles was recently encountered in a male cadaver that provided ample tissue for an analysis of its architecture and fiber type. The muscle mass, muscle length, fiber length, and pennation angle of muscle fibers were measured to ascertain physiological cross-sectional area and thereby estimate force production. Fiber type composition was also examined using immunofluorescent labeling. The results show that this is a muscle of mixed fiber type composition, similar to the rectus abdominus, and that the estimated forces generated by this muscle are relatively small.

Key words

fiber type microdissection pyramidalis skeletal muscle 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anson BJ, Beaton LE, McVay CC (1938) The pyramidalis muscle. Anat Rec 72, 405–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burkholder TJ, Fingado B, Baron S, Lieber RL (1994) Relationship between muscle fiber types and sizes and muscle architectural properties in the mouse hindlimb. J Morphol 221, 177–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coffield JA, Bakry N, Zhang RD, Carlson J, Gomella LG, Simpson LL (1997) In vitro characterization of botulinum toxin types A, C and D action on human tissues: Combined electrophysiologic, pharmacologic and molecular biologic approaches. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 280, 1489–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dickson MJ (1999) The pyramidalis muscle. J Obstet Gynaecol 19, 300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Friden J, Lovering RM, Lieber RL (2004) Fiber length variability within the flexor carpi ulnaris and flexor carpi radialis muscles: Implications for surgical tendon transfer. J Hand Surg [Am] 29, 909–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gans C, Bock WJ (1965) The functional significance of muscle architecture: a theoretical analysis. Ergeb Anat Entwicklungsgesch 38, 115–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Goss CM (ed.) (1948) Gray’s Anatomy Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  8. Williams L, Warwick R (eds) (1980) Gray’s Anatomy, Churchill Livingstone, London.Google Scholar
  9. Hickey MS, Carey JO, Azevedo JL et al. (1995) Skeletal muscle fiber composition is related to adiposity and in vitro glucose transport rate in humans. Am J Physiol 268, E453–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lieber RL, Friden J (2000) Functional and clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture. Muscle Nerve 23, 1647–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lovering RM, De Deyne PG (2004) Contractile function, sarcolemma integrity, and the loss of dystrophin after skeletal muscle eccentric contraction-induced injury. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 286, C230–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lucas SM, Ruff RL, Binder MD (1987) Specific tension measurements in single soleus and medial gastrocnemius muscle fibers of the cat. Exp Neurol 95, 142–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maganaris CN, Baltzopoulos V, Ball D, Sargeant AJ (2001) In vivo specific tension of human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 90, 865–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Monkhouse WS, Khalique A (1986) Variations in the composition of the human rectus sheath: A study of the anterior abdominal wall. J Anat 145, 61–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Anson BJ (ed.) (1966) Morris’ Human Anatomy. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  16. Rankin G, Stokes M, Newham DJ (2006) Abdominal muscle size and symmetry in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve 34, 320–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sinha DN, Kumar V (1985) Study of human pyramidalis muscle in Indian subjects. Anthropol Anz 43, 173–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tokita K (2006) Anatomical significance of the nerve to the pyramidalis muscle: A morphological study. Anat Sci Int 81, 210–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Association of Anatomists 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Anatomy and NeurobiologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of Maryland, School of MedicineBaltimore

Personalised recommendations