Fisheries Science

, Volume 73, Issue 4, pp 784–791 | Cite as

Association between bacterial community structures and mortality of fish larvae in intensive rearing systems

  • Gentoku Nakase
  • Yoshizumi Nakagawa
  • Shigeru Miyashita
  • Toshiro Nasu
  • Shigeharu Senoo
  • Hiroko Matsubara
  • Mitsuru EguchiEmail author


Bacterial community structures were analyzed in water used for rearing fish larvae by fluorescence in situ hybridization. In Experiment 1, red sea bream Pagrus major larvae were reared in two commercial seed production tanks. The survival rate in Tank 1 was higher than in Tank 2, even though phytoplankton, Nannochloropsis sp., was added to both tanks. In Tank 2, γ-proteobacteria became dominant (∼70% of total bacteria) on day 13, there after heavy larval mortalities occurred. In Tank 1, however, α-proteobacteria and the Cytophaga-Flavobacterium cluster were predominant from day − 1 until day 13; no significant mortality was recorded. In Experiment 2, marble goby Oxyeleotris marmoratus larvae were cultured with or without Nannochloropsis sp. At the end of the experiment, larval survival rates in aquaria with Nannochloropsis sp. were significantly (P <0.05) higher than those without. In rearing water without Nannochloropsis sp., γ-proteobacteria increased during rearing. In rearing water with Nannochloropsis sp., α-prote obacteria and the Cytophaga-Flavobacterium cluster were predominant at the beginning of the experiments and the relative abundance of γ-proteobacteria was maintained at a lower level throughout the experiments. The predominance of α-proteobacteria and the Cytophaga-Flavobacterium cluster appears to be a good indicator of successful larval production.

Key Words

bacterial community structure fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) larval mortality larval rearing phytoplankton 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Planas M, Cunha I. Larviculture of marine fish: problems and perspectives. Aquaculture 1999; 177: 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Munro PD, Barbour A, Birkbeck TH. Comparison of the growth and survival of larval turbot in the absence of Vibrio anguillarum, Vibrio alginolyticus, or a marine Aeromonas sp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995; 61: 4425–4428.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Skjermo J, Salvesen I, Øie G, Vadstein O. Microbially matured water: a technique for selection of a nonopportunistic bacterial flora in water that may improve performance of marine larvae. Aquacult. Int. 1997; 5: 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salvesen I, Skjermo J, Vadstein O. Growth of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) during first feeding in relation to the proportion of r/K-strategists in the bacterial community of the rearing water. Aquaculture 1999; 175: 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Verner-Jeffreys DW, Shields RJ, Bricknell IR, Birkbeck TH. Effects of different water treatment methods and antibiotic addition on larval survival and gut microflora development in Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus L.) yolk-sac larvae. Aquaculture 2004; 232: 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Olafsen JA. Interactions between fish larvae and bacteria in marine aquaculture. Aquaculture 2001; 200: 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bourne DG, Young N, Webster N, Payne M, Salmon M, Demel S, Hall M. Microbial community dynamics in a larval aquaculture system of the tropical rock lobster, Panulirus ornatus. Aquaculture 2004; 242: 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jorquera MA, Lody M, Leyton Y, Riquelme C. Bacteria of subclass γ-Proteobacteria associated with commercial Argopecten purpuratus (Lamark, 1819) hatcheries in Chile. Aquaculture 2004; 236: 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tolomei A, Burke C, Crer B, Carson J. Bacterial decontamination of on-grown Artemia. Aquaculture 2004; 232: 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schulze AD, Alabi AO, Tattersall-Sheldrake AR, Miller KM. Bacterial diversity in a marine hatchery: balance between pathogenic and potentially probiotic bacterial strains. Aquaculture 2006; 256: 50–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Itoi S, Niki A, Sugita H. Changes in microbial communities associated with the conditioning of filter material in recirculating aquaculture systems of the pufferfish Takifugu rubripes. Aquaculture 2006; 256: 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Glöckner FO, Fuchs BM, Amann R. Bacterioplankton compositions of lakes and oceans: a first comparison based on fluorescence in situ hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999; 65: 3721–3726.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Manz W, Amann R, Ludwig W, Wagner M, Schleifer K. Phylogenetic oligodeoxynucleotide probes for the major subclasses of proteobacteria: problems and solutions. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1992; 15: 593–600.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Manz W, Amann R, Ludwig W, Vancanneyt M, Schleifer K. Application of a suite of 16S rRNA-specific oligonucleotide probes designed to investigate bacteria of the phylum cytophaga-flavobacter-bacterioides in the natural environment. Microbiology 1996; 142: 1097–1106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Porter KG, Feig YS. The use of DAPI for identifying and counting aquatic microflora. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1980; 25: 943–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Verdonck L, Swings J, Kersters K, Dehasque M, Sorgeloos P, Leger P. Variability of the microbial environment of rotifer Brachionus plicatilis and Artemia production systems. J. World Aquaculture Soc. 1994; 25: 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Verdonck L, Grisez L, Sweetmann E, Minkoff G, Sorgeloos P, Ollevier F, Swings J. Vibrios associated with routine productions of Brachionus plicatilis. Aquaculture 1997; 149: 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eddy SD, Jones SH. Microbiology of summer flounder Paralichthys dentatus fingerling production at a marine fish hatchery. Aquaculture 2002; 211: 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grisez L, Reyniers J, Verdonck L, Swings J, Ollevier F. Dominant intestinal microflora of sea bream and sea bass larvae, from two hatcheries, during larval development. Aquaculture 1997; 155: 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pedersen K, Dalsgaard I, Larsen JL. Vibrio damsela associated with diseased fish in Denmark. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997; 63: 3711–3715.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Balebona MC, Andreu MJ, Bordas MA, Zorrilla I, Morinigo MA, Borrego JJ. Pathogenicity of Vibrio alginolyticus for cultured gilt-head sea bream (Sparus aurata L.). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998; 64: 4269–4275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fouz B, Alcaide E, Barrera R, Amaro C. Susceptibility of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to vibriosis due to Vibrio vulnificus biotype 2 (serovar E). Aquaculture 2002; 212: 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eilers H, Pernthaler J, Glöckner FO, Amann R. Culturability and in situ abundance of pelagic bacteria from the North Sea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000; 66: 3044–3051.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yokokawa T, Nagata T, Cottrell MT, Kirchman DL. Growth rate of the major phylogenetic bacterial groups in the Delaware estuary. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2004; 49: 1620–1629.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nicolas J-L, Corre S, Cochard J-C. Bacterial population association with phytoplankton cultured in a bivalve hatchery. Microb. Ecol. 2004; 48: 400–413.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grossart H-P, Levold F, Allgaier M, Simon M, Brinkhoff T. Marine diatom species harbour distinct bacterial communities. Environ. Microbiol. 2005; 7: 860–873.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jasti S, Sieracki ME, Poulton NJ, Giewat MW, Rooney-Varga JN. Phylogenetic diversity and specificity of bacteria closely associated with Alexandrium spp. and other phytoplankton. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005; 71: 3483–3494.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nakase G, Eguchi M. Analysis of bacterial communities in Nannochloropsis sp. cultures used for larval fish production. Fish. Sci. 2007; 73: 543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cottrell MT, Kirchman D. Natural assemblages of marine proteobacteria and members of the Cytophaga-Flavobacter cluster consuming low- and high- molecular-weight dissolved organic matter. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000; 66: 1692–1697.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Waite AM, Olson RJ, Dam HG, Passow U. Sugar-containing compounds on the cell surfaces of marine diatoms measured using concanavalin A and flow cytometry. J. Phycol. 1995; 31: 925–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zubkov MV, Fuchs BM, Archer SD, Kiene RP, Amann R, Burkill PH. Linking the composition of bacterioplankton to rapid turnover of dissolved dimethylsulphoniopropionate in an algal bloom in the North Sea. Environ. Microbiol. 2001; 3: 304–311.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Fisheries Science 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gentoku Nakase
    • 1
  • Yoshizumi Nakagawa
    • 2
  • Shigeru Miyashita
    • 2
  • Toshiro Nasu
    • 2
  • Shigeharu Senoo
    • 3
  • Hiroko Matsubara
    • 3
  • Mitsuru Eguchi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Graduate School of AgricultureKinki UniversityNaraJapan
  2. 2.Fisheries Laboratory of Kinki UniversityWakayamaJapan
  3. 3.Borneo Marine Research Institute of University Malaysia SabahKota Kinabalu, SabahMalaysia

Personalised recommendations