Ecological Research

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 633–643 | Cite as

Prey use by web-building spiders: stable isotope analyses of trophic flow at a forest-stream ecotone

  • Chika KATO
  • Tomoya IWATAEmail author
  • Eitaro WADA
Original Articles

A forest-stream trophic link was examined by stable carbon isotope analyses which evaluated the relationship of aquatic insects emerging from a stream to the diets of web-building spiders. Spiders, aquatic and terrestrial prey, and basal resources of forest and stream food webs were collected in a deciduous forest along a Japanese headwater stream during May and July 2001. The δ13C analyses suggested that riparian tetragnathid spiders relied on aquatic insects and that the monthly variation of such dependence is partly associated with the seasonal dynamics of aquatic insect abundance in the riparian forest. Similarly, linyphiid spiders in the riparian forest exhibited δ13C values similar to aquatic prey in May. However, their δ13C values were close to terrestrial prey in both riparian and upland (150 m away from the stream) forests during June to July, suggesting the seasonal incorporation of stream-derived carbon into their tissue. In contrast, araneid spiders relied on terrestrial prey in both riparian and upland forests throughout the study period. These isotopic results were consistent with a previous study that reported seasonal variation in the aquatic prey contribution to total web contents for each spider group in this forest, implying that spiders assimilate trapped prey and that aquatic insect flux indeed contributes to the energetics of riparian tetragnathid and linyphiid spiders.

Key words

adult aquatic insects forest-stream linkages riparian web-building spiders stable carbon isotope ratios 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brodsky A. K. (1994) The Evolution of Insect Flight. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Collier K. J., Bury S. & Gibbs M. (2002) A stable isotope study of linkages between stream and terrestrial food webs through spider predation. Freshwater Biology 47: 1651–1659.Google Scholar
  3. Craig C. L. (1987) The ecological and evolutionary interdependence between web architecture and web silk spun by orb web weaving spiders. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 30: 135–162.Google Scholar
  4. DeNiro M. J. & Epstein S. (1978) Influence of diet on the distribution of carbon isotopes. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 42: 495–506.Google Scholar
  5. Finlay J. C. (2001) Stable-carbon-isotope ratios of river biota: implications for energy flow in lotic food webs. Ecology 82: 1052–1064.Google Scholar
  6. Finlay J. C., Power M. E. & Cabana G. (1999) Effects of water velocity on algal carbon isotope ratios: implications for river food web studies. Limnology and Oceanography 44: 1198–1203.Google Scholar
  7. France R. L. (1995) Critical examination of stable isotope analysis as a means for tracing carbon pathways in stream ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52: 651–656.Google Scholar
  8. Fry B. & Sherr E. B. (1984) δ13C measurements as indicators of carbon flow in marine and freshwater ecosystems. Contributions in Marine Science 27: 13–47.Google Scholar
  9. Hall R. O., Wallace J. B. & Eggert S. L. (2000) Organic matter flow in stream food webs with reduced detrital resource base. Ecology 81: 3445–3463.Google Scholar
  10. Henschel J. R., Mahsberg D. & Stumpf H. (2001) Allochthonous aquatic insects increase predation and decrease herbivory in river shore food webs. Oikos 93: 429–438.Google Scholar
  11. Iwata T., Nakano S. & Murakami M. (2003) Stream meanders increase insectivorous bird abundance in riparian deciduous forests. Ecography 26: 325–337.Google Scholar
  12. Jackson J. K. & Fisher S. G. (1986) Secondary production, emergence, and export of aquatic insects of a Sonoran Desert stream. Ecology 67: 629–638.Google Scholar
  13. Kato C., Iwata T., Nakano S. & Kishi D. (2003) Dynamics of aquatic insect flux affects distribution of riparian web-building spiders. Oikos 103: 113–120.Google Scholar
  14. Kohzu A., Nishizawa N., Boontanon N. & Wada E. (1999) The use of natural 13C and 15N abundances for monitoring of environmental stress. Journal of Bioresource Sciences 2: 1–10 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  15. Likens G. E. & Bormann F. H. (1974) Linkages between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Bioscience 24: 447–456.Google Scholar
  16. Mason D. F. & MacDonald S. M. (1982) The input of terrestrial invertebrates from tree canopies to a stream. Freshwater Biology 12: 305–311.Google Scholar
  17. Merritt R. W. & Cummins K. W. (1978) An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. Kendall/Hunt Publishing, Dubuque.Google Scholar
  18. Mihuc T. R. (1997) The functional trophic role of lotic primary consumers: generalist versus specialist strategies. Freshwater Biology 37: 455–462.Google Scholar
  19. Nakano S., Miyasaka H. & Kuhara N. (1999) Terrestrial-aquatic linkages: riparian arthropod inputs alter trophic cascades in a stream food web. Ecology 80: 2435–2441.Google Scholar
  20. Nakano S. & Murakami M. (2001) Reciprocal subsidies: dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98: 166–170.Google Scholar
  21. Oelbermann K. & Scheu S. (2002) Stable isotope enrichment (δ15N and δ13C) in a generalist predator (Pardosa lugubris, Araneae: Lycosidae): effects of prey quality. Oecologia 130: 337–344.Google Scholar
  22. Olive C. W. (1981) Co-adapted foraging traits in a guild of orb-weaving spiders. Oecologia 49: 88–91.Google Scholar
  23. Ostrom P. H., Colunga G. M. & Gage S. H. (1997) Establishing pathways of energy flow for insect predators using stable isotope ratios: field and laboratory evidence. Oecologia 109: 108–113.Google Scholar
  24. Petersen I., Winterbottom J. H., Orton S., Friberg N., Hildrew A. G., Spiers D. C. & Gurney W. S. C. (1999) Emergence and lateral dispersal of adult Plecoptera and Trichoptera from Broadstone Stream, U.K. Freshwater Biology 42: 401–416.Google Scholar
  25. Peterson B. J. & Fry B. (1987) Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 293–320.Google Scholar
  26. Power M. E. & Rainey W. E. (2000) Food webs and resource sheds: towards spatially delimiting trophic interactions. In: Ecological Consequences of Habitat Heterogeneity (eds M. J. Hutchings, E. A. John & A. J. A. Stewart), pp. 291–314. Blackwell Science, London.Google Scholar
  27. Rounick J. K. & Winterbourn M. J. (1986) Stable isotopes and carbon flow in ecosystems. Bioscience 36: 171–177.Google Scholar
  28. Townes H. (1972) A light-weight Malaise trap. Entomological News 83: 239–247.Google Scholar
  29. Uetz G. W. & Hartsock S. P. (1987) Prey selection in an orb-weaving spider: Micrathena gracilis (Araneae: Araneidae). Psyche 94: 103–116.Google Scholar
  30. Vander Zanden M. J. & Rasmussen J. B. (2001) Variation in δ15N and δ13C trophic fractionation: implications for aquatic food web studies. Limnology and Oceanography 46: 2061–2066.Google Scholar
  31. Vannote R. L., Minshall G. W., Cummins K. W., Sedell J. R. & Cushing C. E. (1980) The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37: 130–137.Google Scholar
  32. Wada E., Kabaya Y. & Kurihara Y. (1993) Stable isotopic structure of aquatic ecosystems. Journal of Bioscience 18: 483–499.Google Scholar
  33. Wallace J. B., Eggert S. L., Meyer J. L. & Webster J. R. (1997) Multiple trophic levels of a forest stream linked to terrestrial litter inputs. Science 277: 102–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Williams D. D., Ambrose L. G. & Browning L. N. (1995) Trophic dynamics of two sympatric species of riparian spider (Araneae: Tetragnathidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 73: 1543–1553.Google Scholar
  35. Wise D. H. (1993) Spiders in Ecological Webs. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Ecological ResearchKyoto UniversityOtsu, ShigaJapan
  2. 2.Research Institute for Humanity and NatureKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Ecosocial System EngineeringUniversity of YamanashiKofu, YamanashiJapan

Personalised recommendations