Ecological Research

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 511–520 | Cite as

Carbon dynamics and budget in a Miscanthus sinensis grassland in Japan

Original Articles

We investigated the carbon dynamics and budget in a grassland of Miscanthus sinensis, which is widely distributed in Japan, over a 2-year period (2000–2001). Plant biomass began to increase from May and peaked in September, then decreased towards the end of the growing season (October). Soil respiration rates also exhibited seasonal fluctuations that reflected seasonal changes in soil temperature and root respiration. The contribution of root respiration to total soil respiration was 22–41% in spring and summer, but increased to 52–53% in September. To determine the net ecosystem production (carbon budget), we estimated annual net primary production, soil respiration, and root respiration. Net primary production was 1207 and 1140 g C m−2 in 2000 and 2001, respectively. Annual soil respiration was 1387 g C m−2 in 2000 and 1408 g C m−2 in 2001; root respiration was 649 and 695 g C m−2 in 2000 and 2001, respectively. Moreover, some of the carbon fixed as net production (457–459 g C m−2) is removed by mowing in autumn in this grassland. Therefore, the annual carbon budget was estimated to be −56 g C m−2 in 2000 and − 100 g C m−2 in 2001. These results suggest that the Miscanthus sinensis grassland in Japan can act as a source of CO2.

Key words

Miscanthus sinensis grassland net ecosystem production net primary production root respiration soil respiration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams J. M., Faure H., Faure-Denard L., McGlade J. M., Woodward F. I. (1990) Increases in terrestrial carbon storage from the Last Glacial Maximum to the present. Nature 348: 711–714.Google Scholar
  2. Baldocchi D., Falge E. & Gu L. et al. (2001) Fluxnet: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 82: 2415–2434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldocchi D., Valentini R., Running S., Oechel W. & Dahlman R. (1996) Strategies for measuring and modelling carbon dioxide and water vapour fluxes over terrestrial ecosystems. Global Change Biology 2: 159–168.Google Scholar
  4. Buchmann N. (2000) Biotic and abiotic factors controlling soil respiration rates in Picea abies stands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32: 1625–1635.Google Scholar
  5. Buyanovsky G. A., Kucera C. L. & Wagner G. H. (1987) Comparative analyses of carbon dynamics in native and cultivated ecosystems. Ecology 68: 2023–2031.Google Scholar
  6. Ciais P., Tans P. P., Trolier M., White J. W. C. & Francey R. J. (1995) A large northern hemisphere terrestrial CO2 sink indicated by the 13C/12C ratio of atmospheric CO2. Science 269: 1098–1102.Google Scholar
  7. Davidson E. A., Belk E. & Boone R. D. (1998) Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Global Change Biology 4: 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davidson E. A., Verchot L. V., Cattânio J. H., Ackerman I. L. & Carvalho J. E. M. (2000) Effects of soil water content on soil respiration in forests and cattle pastures of eastern Amazonia. Biogeochemistry 48: 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dugas W. A., Heuer M. L. & Mayeux H. S. (1999) Carbon dioxide fluxes over bermudagrass, native prairie, and sorghum. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 93: 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epron D., Farque L., Lucot É. & Badot P.-M. (1999) Soil CO2 efflux in a beech forest: dependence on soil temperature and soil water content. Annals of Forest Science 56: 221–226.Google Scholar
  11. Fan S., Gloor M., Mahlman J., Pacala S., Sarmiento J., Takahashi T. & Tans P. (1998) A large terrestrial carbon sink in North America implied by atmospheric and oceanic carbon dioxide data and models. Science 282: 442–446.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Flanagan L. B., Wever L. A. & Carlson P. J. (2002) Seasonal and interannual variation in carbon dioxide exchange and carbon balance in a northern temperate grassland. Global Change Biology 8: 599–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frank A. B. & Dugas W. A. (2001) Carbon dioxide fluxes over a northern, semiarid, mixed-grass prairie. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 108: 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graetz D. (1994) Grasslands. In: Changes in Land Use and Land Cover: a Global Perspective (eds W. B. Meyer & B. L. Turner, II), pp. 125–147. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Gupta S. R. & Singh J. S. (1981) Soil respiration in a tropical grassland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 13: 261–268.Google Scholar
  16. Hayashi I., Hishinuma Y. & Yamasawa T. (1981) Structure and functioning of Miscanthus sinensis grassland in Sugadaira, Central Japan. Vegetatio 48: 17–25.Google Scholar
  17. IPCC (1996) Climate Change 1995. Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  18. Iwaki H., Midorikawa B. & Hogetsu K. (1964) Studies on the productivity and nutrient element circulation in Kirigamine grassland, central Japan. II. Seasonal change in standing crop. Botanical Magazine, Tokyo 77: 447–457.Google Scholar
  19. Kayama R., Yano N. & Sugimoto Y. (1972) Studies on the relationship between Miscanthus sinensis community and soil. (3) Seasonal variation of production of Miscanthus sinensis grassland and the soil conditions. Japanese Journal of Ecology 22: 151–161.Google Scholar
  20. Kim J., Verma S. B. & Clement R. J. (1992) Carbon dioxide budget in a temperate grassland ecosystem. Journal of Geophysical Research 97: 6057–6063.Google Scholar
  21. Koizumi H., Kontturi M., Mariko S. & Mela T. (1996) Carbon dioxide evolution from snow-covered agricultural ecosystems in Finland. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 5: 421–430.Google Scholar
  22. Kucera C. L. & Kirkham D. R. (1971) Soil respiration studies in tallgrass prairie in Missouri. Ecology 52: 912–915.Google Scholar
  23. Lamade E., Djegui N. & Leterme P. (1996) Estimation of carbon allocation to the roots from soil respiration measurements of oil palm. Plant and Soil 181: 329–339.Google Scholar
  24. Mariko S., Bekku Y. & Koizumi H. (1994) Efflux of carbon dioxide from snow-covered forest floors. Ecological Research 9: 343–350.Google Scholar
  25. Mariko S., Nishimura N., Mo W., Matsui Y., Kibe T. & Koizumi H. (2000) Winter CO2 flux from soil and snow surfaces in a cool-temperate deciduous forest, Japan. Ecological Research 15: 363–372.Google Scholar
  26. Mielnick P. C. & Dugas W. A. (2000) Soil CO2 flux in a tallgrass prairie. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32: 221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nakatsubo T., Bekku Y., Kume A. & Koizumi H. (1998) Respiration of the belowground parts of vascular plants: its contribution to total soil respiration on a successional glacier foreland in Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard. Polar Research 17: 53–59.Google Scholar
  28. Sala O. E., Parton W. J., Joyce L. A. & Lauenroth W. K. (1988) Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology 69: 40–45.Google Scholar
  29. Shimada Y., Iwaki H., Midorikawa B. & Ohga N. (1975) Primary productivity of the Miscanthus sinensis community at the Kawatabi IBP area –Standing crop of aboveground parts. In: Ecological Studies in Japanese Grasslands with Special Reference to the IBP Area. JIBP Synthesis, Vol. 13 (ed. M. Numata), pp. 110–114. Tokyo University Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  30. Sims P. L. & Bradford J. A. (2001) Carbon dioxide fluxes in a southern plains prairie. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 109: 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sims P. L. & Singh J. S. (1978) The structure and function of ten western North American grasslands. III. Net primary production, turnover and efficiencies of energy capture and water use. Journal of Ecology 66: 573–597.Google Scholar
  32. Suyker A. E. & Verma S. B. (2001) Year-round observations of the net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide in a native tallgrass prairie. Global Change Biology 7: 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tans P. P., Fung I. Y. & Takahashi T. (1990) Observational constraints on the global atmospheric CO2 budget. Science 247: 1431–1438.Google Scholar
  34. Uchida M., Nakatsubo T., Horikoshi T. & Nakane K. (1998) Contribution of micro-organisms to the carbon dynamics in black spruce (Picea mariana) forest soil in Canada. Ecological Research 13: 17–26.Google Scholar
  35. Wagai R., Brye K. R., Gower S. T., Norman J. M. & Bundy L. G. (1998) Land use and environmental factors influencing soil surface CO2 flux and microbial biomass in natural and managed ecosystems in southern Wisconsin. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30: 1501–1509.Google Scholar
  36. Yano N. & Kayama R. (1975) Underground. In: Ecological Studies in Japanese Grasslands with Special Reference to the IBP Area. JIBP Synthesis, Vol. 13 (ed. M. Numata), pp. 147–160. Tokyo University Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yukihiro YAZAKI
    • 1
  • Shigeru MARIKO
    • 2
  • Hiroshi KOIZUMI
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Basin Ecosystem StudiesGifu UniversityGifuJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Biological SciencesUniversity of TsukubaIbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations