Ecological Research

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 255–259 | Cite as

Does seed production of spring ephemerals decrease when spring comes early?

  • Gaku KUDO
  • Tetsuya KASAGI
  • Shoji KOSUGE
Note and Comment

To predict the effect of global warming on plant reproductive success, seed-sets of spring ephemerals were compared between a year of extremely warm spring (2002) and normal years at cool-temperate deciduous forests in northern Japan. The spring of 2002 was the warmest in the last 40 years and most spring-ephemeral plants bloomed 7–17 days earlier than usual. The seed-set of bumblebee-pollinated Corydalis ambigua drastically decreased in 2002 in every population. The small bee-pollinated Gagea lutea also significantly decreased in 2002. However, the seed-sets of two fly pollinated species, Adonis ramosa and Anemone flaccida, were not influenced by early flowering. These results indicat that the effect of global warming on seed production of spring ephemerals differs between species depending on the type of pollinators, and that bee-pollinated species can have serious impacts on reproductive success as a result of climate change.

Key words

flowering phenology global warming pollination seed set spring ephemerals 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alford D. V. (1969) A study of the hibernation of bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Bombidae) in southern England. Journal of Animal Ecology 38: 149–170.Google Scholar
  2. Cane J. H. & Tepedino V. J. (2001) Cause and extent of declines among native North American invertebrate pollinators: detection, evidence, and consequences. Conservation Ecology 5: 1. [cited 4 April 2001]. Available from URL: Scholar
  3. Diekmann M. (1995) Relationship between flowering phenology of perennial herbs and meteorological data in deciduous forest of Sweden. Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 528–537.Google Scholar
  4. Fitter A. H., Fitter R. S. R., Harris I. T. B. & Williamson M. H. (1995) Relationships between first flowering date and temperature in the flora of a locality in central England. Functional Ecology 9: 55–60.Google Scholar
  5. Gugerli F. (1997) Sexual reproduction in Saxifraga oppositifolia L. & Saxifraga biflora All. (Saxifragaceae) in the Alps. International Journal of Plant Science 158: 274–281.Google Scholar
  6. Higashi S., Ohara M., Arai H. & Matsuo K. (1988) Robber-like pollinators: overwintered queen bumblebees foraging on Corydalis ambigua. Ecological Entomology 13: 411–418.Google Scholar
  7. Hughes L. (2000) Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 56–61.Google Scholar
  8. Inouye D. W., Barr B., Armitage K. B. & Inouye B. D. (2000) Climate change is affecting altitudinal migrants and hibernating species. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the United Stats of America 97: 1630–1633.Google Scholar
  9. Inouye D. W., Morales M. A. & Dodge G. J. (2002) Variation in timing and abundance of flowering by Delphinium barbeyi Huth (Ranunculaceae): the roles of snowpack, frost, and La Niña, in the context of climate change. Oecologia 130: 543–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kearns C. A. (2001) North American dipteran pollinators: assessing their value and conservation status. Conservation Ecology 5: 5. [Cited 5 April 2001] Available from URL: Scholar
  11. Kearns C. A. & Inouye D. W. (1994) Fly pollination of Linum lewisii (Livaceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 1091–1095.Google Scholar
  12. Kudo G. (1995) Ecological significance of flower heliotropism in the spring ephemeral Adonis ramose (Ranunculaceae). Oikos 72: 14–20.Google Scholar
  13. Kudo G. & Kasagi T. (2004) Floral sex allocation in Corydalis ambigua populations visited by different pollinators. Ecoscience 11: (in press).Google Scholar
  14. Kudo G., Maeda T. & Narita K. (2001) Variation in floral sex allocation and reproductive success within inflorescences of Corydalis ambigua (Fumariaceae): pollination efficiency or resource limitation? Journal of Ecology 89: 48–56.Google Scholar
  15. Motten A. F. (1986) Pollination ecology of the spring wildflower community of a temperate deciduous forest. Ecological Monographs 56: 21–42.Google Scholar
  16. Nishikawa Y. (1998) The function of multiple flowers of a spring ephemeral, Gagea lutea (Liliaceae), with reference to blooming order. Canadian Journal of Botany 76: 1404–1411.Google Scholar
  17. Nishikawa Y. & Kudo G. (1995) Relationship between flower number and reproductive success of a spring ephemeral herb, Anemone flaccida (Ranunculaceae). Plant Species Biology 10: 111–118.Google Scholar
  18. Ohara M. & Higashi S. (1994) Effects of inflorescence size on visits from pollinators and seed set of Corydalis ambigua (Papaveraceae). Oecologia 98: 25–30.Google Scholar
  19. Schemske D. W., Willson M. F., Melampy M. N., Miller L. J., Verner L., Schemske K. M. & Best L. B. (1978) Flowering ecology of some spring woodland herbs. Ecology 59: 351–366.Google Scholar
  20. Thórhallsdóttir T. E. (1998) Flowering phenology in the central highland of Iceland and implications for climatic warming in the Arctic. Oecologia 114: 43–49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gaku KUDO
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tetsuya KASAGI
    • 1
  • Shoji KOSUGE
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Environmental Earth ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  2. 2.Hokkaido Institute of Environmental ScienceSapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations