Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 80, Issue 4, pp 569–589 | Cite as

Residential environments and cardiovascular risk

Article

Abstract

The article begins with a discussion of the rationale for studying the relationship between residential environments and cardiovascular health. Existing empirical research relating residential environments to cardiovascular outcomes and risk factors is summarized. The research areas discussed include neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics and cardiovascular disease, the effects of residential environments on physical activity, and the effects of residential environments on diet. Other mechanisms through which residential environments may affect cardiovascular health are also briefly noted. Key challenges in investigating the relationship between residential environments and health are discussed. These challenges include characterizing environments (including definition and geographic scale as well as conceptualization and measurement of relavant features), the limitations of observational studies, and the need to evaluate the health impact of interventions or “naturally” occurring changes in local environments. The need for interdisciplinary work is emphasized.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol. 1985;14:32–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rose G. The Strategy of Preventive Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Syme L. Strategies for health promotion. Prev Med. 1986;15:492–507.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    MRFIT Research Group. The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Prev. Med. 1981;10:387–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hjerrman I, Velve-Byre DV, Hegeland A, Leren P. Effect of diet and smoking intervention on the incidence of coronary heart disease: report from the Oslo study group of a randomised trial in healthy men. Lancet. 1981;ii:1303–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    WHO Collaborative Group. European collaborative trial of multifactorial prevention of coronary heart disease: final report on the 6-year results. Lancet. 1986;i:869–872.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fortman SP, Taylor CB, Winkleby M. Effect of community health education on plasma cholesterol levels and diet: the Stanford Five-City Project. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137: 1039–1055.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wing S, Barnett E, Casper M, Tyroler HA. Geographic and socioeconomic variation in the onset of decline of coronary heart disease mortality in white women. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:204–209.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wing S. Social inequalities in the decline of coronary mortality. Am J Public Health. 1988;78:1415–1416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wing S, Casper M, Davis W, Hayes C, Riggan W, Tyroler HA. Trends in the geographic inequality of cardiovascular disease mortality in the United States, 1962–1982. Soc Sci Med. 1990; 30:261–266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mokdad AH, Serdula MK, Dietz WH, Bowman BA, Marks JS, Koplan JP. The spread of the obesity epidemic in the United States, 1991–1998. JAMA. 1999;282:1519–1522.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rolls BJ. The supersizing of america: portion size and the obesity epidemic. Nutr Today. 2003;38:42–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frumkin H. Urban sprawl and public health. Public Health Rep. 2002;117:201–217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Williams DR. Socioeconomic differentials in health: a review and redirection. Soc Psychol Q. 1990;53:81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schmid TL, Pratt M, Howze E. Policy as intervention: environmental and policy approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Am J Public Health. 1995;85: 1207–1211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stokols D, Allen J, Bellingham RL. The social ecology of health promotion: implications for research and practice. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10:247–251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Davey Smith G, Hart C, Watt G, Hole D, Hawthorne V. Individual social class, area-based deprivation, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and mortality: the Renfrew and Paisley study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:399–405.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Diez Roux AV, Nieto FJ, Muntaner C, et al. Neighborhood environments and coronary heart disease: a multilevel analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146:48–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Waitzman NJ, Smith KR. Phantom of the area: poverty-area residence and mortality in the United States. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:973–976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Diez Roux AV, Merkin SS, Arnett D, et al. Neighborhood of residence and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:99–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ellaway A, Macintyre S. Does where you live predict health related behaviours?: a case study in Glasgow. Health Bull (Edinburgh). 1996;54:443–446.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ellaway A, Anderson A, Macintyre S. Does area of residence affect body size and shape? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1997;21:304–308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Diez Roux AV, Nietoi FJ, Caulfield L, Tyroler HA, Watson RL, Szklo M Neighbourhood differences in diet: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:55–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hart C, Ecob R, Smith GD. People, place and coronary heart disease risk factors: a multilevel analysis of the Scottish Heart Health Study archive. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45: 893–902.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sallis JF, Bauman A, Pratt M. Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15:379–397.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sallis JF, Kraft K, Linton LS. How the environment shapes physical activity: a transdisciplinary research agenda. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22:208.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al. Pysical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA. 1995;273:402–407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E. Enviromental factors associated with adult’s participation in physical activity: a review. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22:188–199.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ. The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinantions of physical activity. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:1793–1812.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Troped PJ, Saunders RP, Pate RR, Reininger B, Ureda JR, Thompson SJ. Associations between self-reported and objective physical environmental factors and use of a community rail-trail. Prev Med. 2001;32:191–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ball K, Bauman A, Leslie E, Owen N. Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults. Prev Med. 2001;33:434–440.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Booth ML, Owen N, Bauman A, Clavisi O, Leslie E. Social-cognitive and perceived environment influences associated with physical activity in older Australians. Prev Med. 2000;31:15–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    King AC, Castro C, Wilcox S, Eyler AA, Sallis JF, Brownson RC. Personal and environmental factors associated with physical inactivity among different racial-ethnic groups of U.S. middle-aged and older-aged women. Health Psychol. 2000;19:354–364.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sternfeld B, Ainsworth BE, Quesenberry CP. Physical activity patterns in a diverse population of women. Prev Med. 1999;28:313–323.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Brownson RC, Baker EA, Housemann RA, Brennan LK, Bacak SJ. Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. Am J Public Health, 2001; 91:1995–2003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    MacDougall C, Cooke R, Owen N, Willson K, Bauman A. Relating physical activity to health status, social connections and community facilities. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1997;21:631–637.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Leslie E, Owen N, Salmon J, Bauman A, Sallis JF, Lo SK. Insufficiently active Australian college students: perceived personal, social, and environmental influences. Prev Med. 1999;28:20–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stahl T, Rutten A, Nutbeam D, et al. The importance of the social environment for physically active lifestyle—results from an international study. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52: 1–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sallis JF, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR, et al. Distance between homes and exercise facilities related to frequency of exercise among San Diego residents. Public Health Rep. 1990;105:179–185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sallis JF, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR, et al. A multivariate study of determinants of vigorous exercise in a community sample. Prev Med. 1989;18:20–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Centers for Disease Control. Neighborhood safety and the prevalence of physical inactivity—selected states, 1996. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48:143–146.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wilcox S, Castro C, King AC, Housemann R, Brownson RC. Determinants of leisure time physical activity in rural compared with urban older and ethnically diverse women in the United States. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54:667–672.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sallis JF, Johnson MF, Calfas KJ, Caparosa S, Nichols JF. Assessing perceived physical environmental variables that may influence physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1997; 68:345–351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sallis JF, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR. Predictors of adoption and maintenance of vigorous physical activity in men and women. Prev Med. 1992;21:237–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Craig CL, Brownson RC, Cragg SE, Dunn AL. Exploring the effect of the environment on physical activity: a study examining walking to work. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23: 36–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pikora TJ, Bull FC, Jamrozik K, Knuiman M, Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ. Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23:187–194.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Raudenbush SW, Sampson RJ. Ecometrics: towards a science of assessing ecological settings, with application to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. Sociol Methodol. 1999;29:1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Handy SL, Boarnet MG, Ewing R, Killingsworth RE. How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23:64–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Frank L, Engelke PO. How land use and transportation systems impact public health: a literature review of the relationship between physical activity and built form. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/aces.htm. Accessed 2003.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ewing R, Cervero R. Travel and the built environment: a synthesis. Transportation Res Rec. 2001;1780:87–114.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Handy S. Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behaviour. Transportation Res D. 1996;65.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ewing R, Haliyur P, Page G. Getting around a traditional city, a suburban planned unit development, and everything in between. Transportation Res Rec. 1994;1466: 53–62.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kitamura R, Mokhtarian PL, Laidet L. A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation. 1997;24:125–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Frank L, Pivo G. Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: single-occupant vehicle, transit, walking Transportation Res Rec. 1994;1466:44–52.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cervero R, Radisch C. Travel choice in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neigh-borhoods. Transport Policy. 1996;3:127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Cervero R. Land-use mixing and suburban mobility. Transportation Q. 1988;42:429–446.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Friedman B, Gordon S, Peers J. Effect of neotraditional neighborhood design on travel characteristics. Transportation Res Rec: 1994;1466:63–70.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Frank LD. Land use and transportation interaction: implications on public health and quality of life. J Plann Educ Res. 2001;20:6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Frank LD, Engelke PO. The built environment and human activity patterns: exploring the impacts of urban form on public health. J Plann Lit. 2001;16:202–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Handy S. Urban form and pedestrian choices: study of Austin neighborhoods. Transportation Res Rec. 1996;1552:135–144.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Handy SL. Understanding the link between urban form and nonwork travel behavior. J Plann Educ Res. 1996;15:183–198.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Handy SL, Clifton KJ. Local shopping as a strategy for reducing automobile travel. Transportation. 2001;28:317–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Cervero R, Kockelman K. Travel demand and the 3ds: density, diversity and design. Transportation Res D. 1997;3:199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Berrigan D, Troiano RP. The association between urban form and physical activity in U.S. adults. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23:74–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Boarnet M, Crane R. The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies. Transportation Res A. 2001;35:823–845.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Krizek KJ. Pretest-posttest strategy for researching neighborhood-scale urban form and travel behavior. Transportation Res Record. 2000;1722:48–55.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Boarnet MG, Sarmiento S. Can land-use policy really affect travel behaviour? A study of the link between non-work travel and land-use characteristics. Urban Stud. 1998; 35:1155–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Arnett DK, McGovern PG, Jacobs DR Jr., et al. Fifteen-year trends in cardiovascular risk factors (1980–1982 through 1995–1997): the Minnesota Heart Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:929–935.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Mooney C. Cost and availability of healthy food choices in a London health district. J Human Nutr Diet. 1990;3:111–120.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wechsler H, Basch C, P Z, R L, Shea S. The availability of low-fat milk in an inner city Latino community: implications for nutrition education. Am J Public Health. 1995;85: 1690–1692.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sooman A, MacIntyre S, Anderson A. Scotland’s health: a more difficult challenge for some? The price and availability of healthy foods in socially contrasting localities in the West of Scotland. Health Bull. 1993;51:276–284.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Troutt D. The Thin Red Line: How the Poor Still Pay More. San Francisco, CA: Consumers Union, West Coast Regional Office; 1993.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Green M. The Poor Pay More... for Less. Part 1: Grocery Shopping. New York, NY: City of New York, Department of Consumer Affairs; 1991.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    California Food Policy Advocates. Improving Access to Food in Low-Income Communities: An Investigation of Three Bay Area Neighborhoods. San Francisco, CA: 1996.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Morland K, Wing S, Diez Roux A, Poole C. Neighborhood characteristics associated with the location of food stores and food service places. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22: 23–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Morland K, Wing S, Roux AD. The contextual effect of the local food environment on residents’ diets: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1761–1768.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Cheadle A, Psaty BM, Curry S, et al. Community-level comparisons between the grocery store environment and individual dietary practices. Prev Med. 1991;20:250–261.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Cummins S, Macintyre S. A systematic study of an urban foodscape: the price and availability of food in Greater Glasgow. Urban Stud. In press.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    McCrory MA, Fuss PJ, Hays NP, Vinken AG, Greenberg AS, Roberts SB. Overeating in America: association between restaurant food consumption and body fatness in healthy adult men and women ages 19 to 80. Obes Res. 1999;7:564–571.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Jeffery RW, French SA. Epidemic obesity in the United States: are fast foods and television viewing contributing? Am J Public Health. 1998;88:277–280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Nielsen SJ, Popkin BM. Patterns and trends in food portion sizes, 1977–1998. JAMA. 2003;289:450–453.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Mercer SL, Green LW, Rosenthal AC, Husten CG, Khan LK, Dietz WH. Possible lessons from the tobacco experience for obesity control. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:1073S–1082S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Hackbarth DP, Silvestri B, Cosper W. Tobacco and alcohol billboards in 50 Chicago neighborhoods: market segmentation to sell dangerous products to the poor. J Public Health Policy. 1995;16:213–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Stoddard JL, Johnson CA, Sussman S, Dent C, Boley-Cruz T. Tailoring outdoor tobacco advertising to minorities in Los Angeles County. J Health Commun. 1998;3: 137–146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Pucci LG, Joseph HM Jr, Siegel M. Outdoor tobacco advertising in six Boston neigh-borhoods: evaluating youth exposure. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15:155–159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Cummins S, Macintyre S. “Food deserts”—evidence and assumption in health policy making. BMJ. 2002;325:436–438.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Forsyth A, Macintyre S, Anderson A. Diets for disease? Intraurban variation in reported food consumption in Glasgow. Appetite. 1994;22:259–274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Krause N. Neighborhood deterioration and social isolation in later life. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1993;36:9–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Krause N. Neighborhood deterioration and self-rated health in later life. Psychol Aging. 1996;11:342–352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Weich S, Blanchard M, Prince M, Burton E, Erens B, Sproston K. Mental health and the built environment: cross-sectional survey of individual and contextual risk factors for depression. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:428–433.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Driessen G, Gunther N, Van Os J. Shared social environment and psychiatric disorder: a multilevel analysis of individual and ecological effects. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998;33:606–612.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Silver E, Mulvey EP, Swanson JW. Neighborhood structural characteristics and mental disorder: Faris and Dunham revisited. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:1457–1470.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Ulrich R, Simons R, Losito B, E F, Miles M, Zelson M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol. 1991;11:201–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Frumkin H. Beyond toxicity: human health and the natural environment. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20:234–240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Stansfeld S, Haines M, Brown B. Noise and health in the urban environment. Rev Environ Health. 2000;15:43–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Spiegel K, Leproult R, Van Cauter E. Impact of sleep debt on metabolic and endocrine function. Lancet. 1999;354:1435–1439.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Nilsson PM, Nilsson JA, Hedblad B, Berglund G. Sleep disturbance in association with elevated pulse rate for prediction of mortality—consequences of mental strain? J Intern Med. 2001;250:521–529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Schwartz J. Air pollution and hospital admissions for heart disease in eight U.S. counties. Epidemiology. 1999;10:17–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Schwartz J. Air pollution and blood markers of cardiovascular risk. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109(suppl 3):405–409.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Schwartz S, Carpenter KM. The right answer for the wrong question: consequences of type III error for public health research. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1175–1180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Macintyre S, Ellaway A, Cummins S. Place effects on health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them? Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:125–139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Diez Roux AV. Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1783–1789.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Sampson R, SW R. Systematic social observation of public spaces: a new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. Am J Sociol. 1999;105:603–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Caughy MO, O’Campo PJ, Patterson J. A brief observational measure for urban neigh-borhoods. Health Place. 2001;7:225–236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science. 1997;277:918–924.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Rushton G. Public health, GIS, and spatial analytic tools. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24:43–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Randall T, Baetz B. Evaluating pedestrian connectivity for suburban sustainability. J Urban Plann Dev. 2001;March:1–15.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Autman-Hall L, Roorda M, Baetz B. Using GIS for evaluation of neighborhood pedestrian accessibility. J Urban Plann Dev. 1997;March:10–17.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Balfour JL, Kaplan GA. Neighborhood environment and loss of physical function in older adults: evidence from the Alameda County Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155: 507–515.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Yen IH, Kaplan GA. Neighborhood social environment and risk of death: multilevel evidence from the Alameda County Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;149:898–907.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Cummins SK, Jackson RJ. The built environment and children’s health. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001;48:1241–1252, x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Richter K, Harris K, Paine-Andrews A, et al. Measuring the health environment for physical activity and nutrition among youth: a review of the literature and applications for community initiatives. Prev Med. 2000;31:S98-S111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Sallis JF, Conway TL, Prochaska JJ, McKenzie TL, Marshall SJ, Brown M. The association of school environments with youth physical activity. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91:618–620.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Ross CE. Walking, exercising, and smoking: does neighborhood matter? Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:265–274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Oakes MJ. The (mis)estimation of neighborhood effects. Soc Sci Med. In press.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Koepsell TD, Diehr PH, Cheadle A, Kristal A. Invited commentary: symposium on community intervention trials. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:594–599.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Murray DM. Design and analysis of cimmunity trials: lessons from the Minnesota Heart Health Program. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:569–575.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Fortmann SP, Flora JA, Winkleby MA, Schooler C, Taylor CB, Farquhar JW. Community intervenstion trials: reflections on the Stanford Five-City Project experience. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:576–585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Pearson TA, Bazzarre TL, Daniels SR, et al. American Heart Association guide for improving cardiovascular health at the community level: a statement for public health practitioners, healthcare providers, and health policy makers from the American Heart Association Expert Panel on Population and Prevention Science. Circulation. 2003; 107:645–651.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology and Center for Social Epidemiology and Population HealthUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations