Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 80, Issue 4, pp 556–568 | Cite as

Sorting out the connections between the built environment and health: A conceptual framework for navigating pathways and planning healthy cities

  • Mary E. Northridge
  • Elliot D. Sclar
  • Padmini Biswas
Article

Abstract

The overarching goal of this article is to make explicit the multiple pathways through which the built environment may potentially affect health and well-being. The loss of close collaboration between urban planning and pulic health professionals that characterized the post-World War II era has limited the design and implementation of effective intervention and policies that might translate into improved health for urban populatons. First, we present a conceptual model that developed out of previous research called Social Determinants of Health and Environmental Health Promotion. Second, we review empirical research from both the urban planning and public health literature regarding the health effects of housing and housing interventions. And third, we wrestle with key challenges in conducting sound scientific research on connections between the built environment and health, namely: (1) the necessity of dealing with the possible health consequences of myriad public and private sector activities; (2) the lack of valid and reliable indicators of the built environment to monitor the health effects of urban planning and policy decisions, especially with regard to land use mix; and (3) the growth of the “megalopolis” or “super urban region” that requires analysis of health effects across state lines and in circumscribed areas within multiple states. We contend that to plan for healthy cities, we need to reinvigorate the historic link between urban planning and public health, and thereby conduct informed science to better guide effective public policy.

Keywords

Urban planning Public health Population health Urban health Built environment Land use Transportation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sclar E, Northridge ME. Property, politics, and public health. Am J Public Health, 2001; 91:1013–1015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HBITAT). Available at: http://www.unhabitat.org/about/challenge.asp. Accessed June 1, 2003.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Northridge ME, Sclar E. A jont urban planning and public health framework; contributions to health impact assessment. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:118–121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schulz AJ, Williams DR, Israel BA, Lembert LB. Racial and spatial relations as fundamental determinants of health in Detroit. Milbank Q. 2002;20(4):677–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schulz A, Northridge ME. Social determinants of health and environmental health promotion. Health Educ Behav. In press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hebbert M. A city in good shape: town planning and public health. Town Planning Rev. 1999:70;433–453.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Greenberg M, Popper F, West B, Krueckeberg D. Linking city planning and public health in the United States. J Plann Lit. 1994;8:235–239.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dannenberg AL, Jackson RJ, Frumkin H, et al. The impact of community design on public health: a scientific research agenda. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1500–1508.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Srinivasan S, O’Fallon LR, Dearry A. Creating healthy communities, healthy homes, healthy people: initiating a research agenda on the built environment and public health. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1446–1450.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jackson RJ. The impact of the built environment on health: An emerging field. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1382–1384.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Killingsworth R, Earp J, Moore R. Supporting health through desing: Challenges and opportunities. Am J Health Promotion. 2003;18:1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krieger N, Northridge ME, Gruskin S, et al. Assessing health impact assessment: multidisciplinary and international perspectives. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:659–662.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frank LD. Land use and transportatiion interactiion: implications on public health and quality of life. J Plann Educ Res. 2000;20:6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sclar E. A metropolitan nation. Am J Public Health. In press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    US Bureau of the Census. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/GCT Table?ds_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U&geo_id=0100US&_box_head_nbr=GCT-PH1-R&format=US-10S. Accessed December 21, 2002.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Health and Environment: Partners for Life. Ottawa, Ontario: Health Canada; 1997. Report available at http://www.arl.ec.gc/community/resoruces.html.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Link BG, Phelan J. Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. J Health Soc Behav. 1995;spec no:80’94.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brenner MH. Fetal, infant, and maternal mortality during periods of economic instability. Int J Health Serv. 1973;3:145–159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sclar ED. Community economic structure and individual well-being: a look behind the statistics. Int J Health Serv. 1980;10:563–579.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krieger N. Does racism harm health? Did child abuse exist before 1962? On explicit questions, critical science, and current controversies: an ecosocial perspective. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:194–199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Glass TA, Dym B, Greenberg S, Rintell D, Roesch C, Berkman LK. Psychosocial intervention in stroke: Families in Recovery from Stroke Trial (FIRST). Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2000;70:169–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ben-Shlomo Y, Kuh D. A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: conceptual models, empirical challenges, and interdisciplinary perspectives. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:285–293.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pond MA. Role of the public health service in housing and urban life. Public Health Reports. 1968;83:101–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sclar ED. Homelessness and housing policy: a game of musical chairs. Am J Public Health. 1990;80:1039–1040.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Northridge ME, Sclar ED. Housing and health. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:701.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Northridge ME, Jean-Louis B, Shoemaker K, Nicholas S. Advancing population health in the Harlem Children Zone Project. Soz Praventiv Med. 2002;47:201–201.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Newfield J. How the other half still lives: in the shadow of wealth, New York’s poor increase. The Nation, March 17, 2003:11–17.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thomson H, Pettricrew M, Douglas M. Health impact assessment of housing improvements: incorporating research evidence. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:11–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Curtis C, Cave B, Coutts A. Is urban regeneration good for health? Perceptions and theories of the health impacts of urban change. Environ Plann C: Gov Policy. 2002;20:517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Somerville M, Mackenzie I, Owen P, et al. Housing and health: does installing heating in the home improve the health of children with asthma? Public Health. 2000;114:434–440.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McGonigle G, Kirby J. Poverty and Public Health. London, England: Gillencz, 1936.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Halpern D. Mental Health and the Built Environment: More Than Bricks and Mortar. London, England: Taylor and Francis, 1995.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dalgard O, Tambs K. Urban environment and mental health: a longitudinal study. J Psychiatry, 1997;171:530–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Collard A. Settling Up: Towards a Strategy for Resettling Homeless Families. London, England: Homeless Forum, 1997.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Saegert SC, Klitzman S, Freudenberg N, Cooperman J, Nassar S. Healthy housing: a structured review of published evaluations of U.S. interventions to improve health by modifying housing in the United States, 1990–2001. Am J Public Health 200393:1471–1477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Prindle RA. Health aspects of the urban environment. Public Health Rep. 1968;83:617–621.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Parker T. The Land Use Air Quality Linkage: Hour Land Use and Transportation Affect Air Quality. Sacramento: California Air Resources Board, 1994.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Handy S. Understanding the link between urban form and network travel behavior. J Plann Educe Res. 1996;15:183–198.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Handy S. Regional versus local accessibility: neo-traditional development and its implications for non-work travel. Built Environ. 1992;18:253–267.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Maantay J. Zoning, equity and public health. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1033–1041.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rodwin VG, Gusmano MK. The World Cities Project: rationale, organization, and design for comparison of megacity health systems. J Urban Health. 2002;79:445–463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nelson DE, Naimi TS, Brewer RD, Bolen, J, Wells HE. Metropolitan area estimates of binge drinking in the United States. Am J Public Health. In press.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Soobader MJ, Subramanian SV, Carson R. Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inqeualities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter? The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:471–482.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Weiss J. Boston Globe Magazine. October 27, 2002:4.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    de la Barra X. Fear of epidemics: the engine of urban planning. Plann Pract Res. 2000; 15:7–16.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wirth L. Urbanism as a way of life. In: LeGates RT, Stout F, eds. The City Reader. 2nd ed. London, England: Routledge; 2000:97–105.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Department of Health, Independent Inquiry Into inequalities in Health: Report. Chairman Sir Richard Acheson. London, England: Stationary Office; 1998.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker A, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998; 19:173–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gilpin A. Environmental Impact Assessment (FIA): Cutting Edge for the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1995.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Krieger N. Theories for social epidemilogy in the 21st century: an ecosocial perspective. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:668–677.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gruskin S, Tarantola D. Health and human rights. In: Detels R, McEwen J, Beaglehole R, Tanaka K, eds. The Oxford Textbook of Public Health. 4th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001:311–335.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kriebel D, Tickner J, Epstein P, et al. The precautionary principle in environmental health. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:871–876.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Quinn MM, Kriebel D, Geiser K, Moure-Eraso R. Sustainable production: a proposed strategy for the work environment. Am J Ind Med. 1998;34:297–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary E. Northridge
    • 1
  • Elliot D. Sclar
    • 2
    • 3
  • Padmini Biswas
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public HealthColumbia UniversityNew York
  2. 2.Urban Planning Program, Graduate School of Architecture, Planning, and PreservationColumbia UniversityNew York
  3. 3.School of International and Public AffairsColumbia UniversityNew York

Personalised recommendations