Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Uncovering the historic environmental hazards of urban brownfields

  • Various Topics
  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Baltimore, over 1,000 vacant industrial sites persist across its urban landscape, yet little is known about the potential environmental health risks that may undermine future cleanup and redevelopment activities and the health of those in communities near these sites. This study examined the characteristics of urban brownfield properties in southeast Baltimore, Maryland, and screened sites for their potential environmental bazards. In addition, demographic and health data were evaluated to profile the social and health status of those in brownfield communities. The results show that brownfields in southeast Baltimore represent a range of historic operations, including metal smelting, oil refining, warehousing, and transportation, as well as paints, plastics, and metals manufacturing. The screening method identified a range of substances associated with these properties, including heavy metals, chlorinated hydrocarbons, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, all of which are suspected or recognized toxicants, and many of which are persistent in the environment. Spatially, these sites are concentrated in white, working class neighborhoods in which poverty levels exceed and educational attainment lags behind state and national averages. Moreover, these sites are concentrated in communities in which excess mortality rates due to respiratory disease, cancer, and heart disease exist when compared to the city, state, and national averages. This investigation demonstrated the usefulness of historic archives, real estate records, regulatory files, and national hazard-tracking systems based on standard industrial classification (SIC) to screen brownfield properties for their hazard potential. This analysis provides the foundation for further site monitoring and testing, cleanup and redevelopment priority setting, risk management strategies, and neighborhood planning, and it illustrates the need for increased health surveillance and disease prevention strategies in affected communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Brownfields Glossary of Terms 1997. Available at: www.epa.gov/swerosps/bf/glossary-htm. Date accessed: September 15, 1997.

  2. Hardy RJ, Schroder GD, Cooper SP, Buffler PA, Prichard HM, Crane M. A surveillance system for assessing health effects from hazardous exposures. Am J Epidemiol. 1990; 132:S32-S42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenberg MR, Lowrie K, Solitare L, Duncan L. Brownfields, TOADs, and the struggle for neighborhood redevelopment. Urban Aff Rev. 2000;35:717–733.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greenberg MR, Lee C, Powers C. Public health and brownfields: reviving the past to protect the future. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1759–1760.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Department of Health and Human Services. Brownfields and Public Health Strategy. 1997. Working Paper.

  6. Wernstedt K, Hersh R: Superfund spectacles on public participation at brownfield sites. Risk: Health, Safety, Environ. 1998;9:153–173.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The Relationship Between Environmental Protection and Opportunities for Inner City Economic Development: How to Promote Economic Reuse of Brownfields. 1995.

  8. ICF Consulting and the E. P. Systems Group, Inc. Assessment of State Initiatives to Promote Redevelopment of Brownfields. Washington, DC: US Dept Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy and Research Development; 1999; HC 5966, Task Order 13, i-40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. US Congress. Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2002. Pub L 107–118 (January 12, 2002).

  10. McElligott TP. Environmental heresy—a new brownfields approach. Environ Reg Permitting. Summer 1997:101–105.

  11. Kibel PS. The urban nexus: open space, brownfields, and justice. Boston College Environ Aff Law Rev. 1998;25:589.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Colten CE. Historical hazards: the geography of relict industrial wastes. Prof Geographer. 1990;42:143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hollander W. Abel Wolman: His Life and Philosophy. Chapel Hill, NC: Universal Printing and Publishing; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tarr JA. The Search for the Ultimate Sink: Urban Pollution in Historical Perspective. Akron, OH: The University of Akron Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bookspan S. Potentially responsible party searches: finding the cause of urban grime. Public Historian. 1991;13:25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Colten CE. Historical questions in hazardous waste management. Public Historian. 1989;11:7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stirling D. Site histories in environmental site assessments: a new opportunity for public historians. Public Historian. 1990;12:45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Melosi M. Public history and the environment. Public Historian. 1993;15:11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gorman H. Manufacturing brownfields: the case of Neville Island, Pennsylvania. Technol Culture. 1997;38:539–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stine JK, Tarr JA. At the intersection of histories: technology and the environment. Technol Culture. 1998;39:601–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kitagawa E, Hauser PM, Differential Mortality in the United States. A Study in Socioeconomic Epidemiology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1973.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Marmot MG, Bobak M, Smith GD. Explanations for social inequalities in health. In: Amick BC, Levine S, Tarlov AR, Walsh DC, eds. Society and Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995:172–210.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Syme SL. Social determinants of disease. In: JM Last, RB Wallace, eds. Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 13th ed.; Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1992:688–700.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE. Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18:341–378.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jerrett M, Eyles J, Cole D. Socioeconomic and environmental covariates of premature mortality in Ontario. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:33–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hardy RJ, Schroder GD, Cooper SP, Buffler PA, Prichard HM, Crane M. A surveillance system for assessing health effects from hazardous exposures. Am J Epidemiol. 1990; 132:S32-S42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lybarger JA, Spengler RF. Introduction. In: Lybarger JA, Spengler RF, DeRosa CT, eds. Priority Health Conditions. Atlanta, GA: Dept of Health and Human Services; 1993: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rios R, Poje G, Detels R. Susceptibility to environmental pollutants among minorities. Toxicol Ind Health. 1993;9:797–820.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rothwell CJ, Hamilton CB, Leaverton PE: Identification of sentinel health events as indicators of environmental contamination. Environ Health Perspect. 1991;94:261–263.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Environmental Systems Research Institute. Arc View 3.2. 2001. United States of America. Redlands, CA: ESRI; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shryock HS, Siegel JS, Stockwell EG. The Methods and Materials of Demography. New York: Academic Press; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Daly LE, Bourke GJ. Interpretation and Uses of Medical Statistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Sciences; 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Commissioner of Labor and Statistics, Maryland Department of Economic and Community Development, Maryland Department of Economic and Employment Development, Maryland Department of Labor. Directory of Maryland Manufacturers. Annapolis, MD: 1988.

  34. Office of Management and Budget. Standard Industrial Classification Manual. Springfield, VA: US Government Printing Office; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  35. US Environmental Protection Agency. Accidental Release Information Program. Available at: www.epa.gov/swercepp/tools/metaarip.txt.Date accessed: January 1, 2000.

  36. Tran N, Burke TA, Fox MA, Litt JS, Shalauta N, Ruscio B. Environmental health risk assessment methodology for overseas military deployment. Johns Hopkins APL Tech Digest. 1999;20:405–414.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Swanson MB, Davis GA, Kincaid LE, et al. A screening method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1997;16:372–383.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1999 CERCLA Priority List of Hazardous Substances That Will Be the Subject of Toxicological Profiles and Support Document. Washington, DC: Dept of Health and Human Services; 1999, i-K-1.

    Google Scholar 

  39. US Environmental Protection Agency. 1987-1996 Toxics Release Inventory, Landview III, Light Edition. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 1999, EPA 749-C-99-003.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Broetzman GG, Hadley PW, Rosenthal NJ. Case Studies of Selected States' Voluntary Cleanup/Brownfields Programs. Available at: www.ccem.com/pdf/bfields.pdf. Date accessed: June 1, 2001.

  41. National Research Council. Environmental Epidemiology: Public Health and Hazardous Wastes. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 1991. 1–282.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Litt JS, Tran NL, Burke TA. Examining urban brownfields through the public health “macroscope.” environ Health Perspect. 2002;110(suppl 2):183–193.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Sanborn Map Company. Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps. Teaneck, NJ: Chadwick-Healey; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  44. ICF Consulting and the E. P. Systems Group. Assessment of State Initiatives to Promote Redevelopment of Brownfields. Washington, DC: US Dept of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy and Research Development. HC 5966, Task Order 13, i-40.

  45. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. EPA Brownfields Program. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; April 4, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Stiber NA, Small MJ, Fischbeck PS. The relationship between historic industrial site use and environmental contamination. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 1998;48:809–818.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado

    Jill S. Litt

  2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Hampton HSE 498, 21205, Baltimore, MD

    Thomas A. Burke PhD, MPH

Authors
  1. Jill S. Litt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas A. Burke PhD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas A. Burke PhD, MPH.

Additional information

At the time of research she was with the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Litt, J.S., Burke, T.A. Uncovering the historic environmental hazards of urban brownfields. J Urban Health 79, 464–481 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/79.4.464

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/79.4.464

Keywords

Search

Navigation