Skip to main content

Assessing immunization rates in an ambulatory care setting

Abstract

Members of the Collaborative Immunization Initiatives determined the immunization coverage rates for two groups of children in our clinic: those 7 to 12 months old and those 18 to 23 months old. The Clinic Assessment Software Application from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was used. The immunization rates determined by this method appeared to significantly underestimate the vaccination coverage rates in our clinic. A review of available charts included in the original sample was done excluding patients no longer attending our clinic. We found a higher rate of coverage in the same sample and a low rate of missed opportunities for administering immunizations. The major reason for this discrepancy is overly stringent Clinic Assessment Software Application inclusion criteria. Additional factors include failure to take into account the wide range of acceptable ages for administering immunizations and different dosages for different brands of vaccines. Different methods of calculation may cause as much as a 20% difference in immunization rates for the same or similar population groups. Such large differences may lead to vastly different responses and interventions. We believe that a central registry is the most accurate method of determining immunization rates. Until this is widely available and applied, a more accurate measure of a facility’s immunization effectiveness is the number of missed opportunities for administering immunizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National vaccination coverage levels among children aged 19–35 months—United States, 1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48:829–830.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National,state and urban area vaccination coverage levels among children aged 19–35 months—United States, 1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998;47:547–554.

    Google Scholar 

  3. American Academy of Pediatrics. Report of the Committee on Infections Diseases. 25th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2000:22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shefer A, Briss P, Rodewald L, et al. Improving immunization coverage rates: an evidence-based review of the literature. Epidemiol Rev. 1999;21:96–142.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolton P, Holt E, Ross A, Hughart N, Guyer B. Estimating vaccination coverage using parental recall, vaccination cards and medical records. Public Health Rep. 1998;113:521–526.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Richards A, Sheridan J. Reasons for delayed compliance with the childhood vaccination schedule and some failings of computerized vaccination registers. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999;23:315–317.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fairbrother G, Freed GL, Thompson JW. Measuring immunization coverage. Am J Prev Med. October 2000; 19(3 suppl):78–88.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for Assessing Vaccination Records in Private and Public Settings. Atlanta, GA: CDC, National Immunization Program; November 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin E. Smith M D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, R.E., Eden, A.N. Assessing immunization rates in an ambulatory care setting. J Urban Health 79, 219–224 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/79.2.219

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/79.2.219

Keywords

  • Immunization
  • Immunization Programs
  • Immunization Rates
  • Patient Participation Rates
  • Registries
  • Vaccination