Skip to main content
Log in

Regional varation in drug purchase opportunity among youths in the United States, 1996–1997

  • Original Articles: Various Topics
  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to examine geographic variation in illegal drug purchase opportunity among young people living in the United States; there was a subfocus on age, sex, and urban/rural residence. Data from the 1996–1997 National Household Surveys on Drug Abuse were analyzed; the nationally representative sample of community residents included 21,531 participants aged 12–24 years old. Respondents were asked if someone had approached them to sell them an illegal drug during the past 30 days. To protect responsents’ confidentiality, there is no fine-grained geographical coding of data in the National Household Surveys on Drug Abuse public use data files, but mine geographical divisional indicators are provided (i.e., West Norht Central, New England, etc.). Results indicated males were an estimated 1.8 times more likely than females to have had a recent illicit drug purchase opportunity, and urban residents were 1.5 times more likely than rural residents to have had a recent drug purchase opportunity. As for geographic divisions, the Pacific division surpassed all other divisions: Its residents were 1.5 times more likely to have recent drug purchase opportunities tha the West North Central division (used bere as a reference category). After controlling statistically for age, sex, and urban/rural residence, fresidence in four divisions was foun to be associated with greater likelihood of an illicit drug purchase opportunity. The observed patterns of drug purchase opportunity add new features to our understanding of illicit drug involvement across the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Etten ML, Anthony JC. Comparative epidemiology of initial drug opportunities and transitions to first use; marijuana, cocaine, hallucinogens and heroin. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999;54(2):117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenberg MF, Anthony JC. Aggressive behavior and opportunities to purchase drugs. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001;63(3):245–252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greene MH, Kozel NJ, Hunt LG, Appletree RL. An Assessment of Diffusion of Heroin Abuse to Medium-Sized Cities. Washingon, DC: Special Action Office for Drug Abuse Prevention; 1974. Special Action Office Monograph, Series A, Number 5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van Etten ML, Neumark YD, Anthony JC. Male-female differences in the earliest stages of drug involvement. Addiction. 1999;94(9):1413–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. US Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA): National Household Survey on drug Abuse, Main Findings: 1996. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 1998; DDHS publication 98-3200.

    Google Scholar 

  6. US Department of Healtg and Human Services. Substance Abuse and mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA): National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, Main Findings: 1997. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 1999. DDHS publication 99-3295.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anthony JC, Warner AL, Kessler RC. Comparative epidemiology of dependence on tobacco, alcohol, controlled substances, and inhalants: basic findings from the National Comorbidity Survey. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1994;2(3):244–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. US Census Bureau. 1990 US Census Data: Population and Housing Unit Counts, CPH-2-1.

  9. StataCorp. 1999 Stata Statistical Software, Release 6.0 College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.

  10. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Anthony JC, Neumark YD, Van Etten ML. Do I Do what I say? A perspective on self-report methods in drug dependence epidemiology. Stone AA, Turkkan JS, Bachrach CA, Jobe JB, Kurtzmann HS, Cain VS eds. The Science of Self-Report. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2000:175–198.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Van Etten ML, Neumark YD, Anthony JC. Initial opportunity to use marijuana and the transition to first use: United States, 1979–1994. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997;49(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Robertson EB, Sloboda Z, Boyd GM, Beatty L, Kozel NJ. Rural Substance Abuse: State of Knowledge and Issues Rockville, MD: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1997. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph Series.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gauvin DV, Sannerud CA, Snyder DA, Sapienza FL. Current observations of methamphetamine supply trends in the United States. Paper presented at: June 2000 Annual Scientific Meeting of the College on problems of Drug Dependence; June 17–June 22, 2000; San Juan, Puerto Rico.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James C. Anthony PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

James, K.E., Wagner, F.A. & Anthony, J.C. Regional varation in drug purchase opportunity among youths in the United States, 1996–1997. J Urban Health 79, 104–112 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/79.1.104

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/79.1.104

Keywords

Navigation