Abstract
Needle-exchange programs (NEPs) have been politically controversial, and most studies have focused on evaluating their effectiveness on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission rates with little emphasis on the process of how they are used. This article shows that the way intravenous drug users use NEPs may influence their effectiveness. Using data from Baltimore's NEP, participants (N=2,574) were classified as low, medium, and high users based on the volume, frequency, and duration of contact with the NEP. Higher NEP use was associated with shorter syringe circulation times and less syringe relay, returning syringes to the NEP originally acquired by someone else. For a subsample that was HIV tested (N=262), syringe relay among women was associated with HIV seroconversion (at a 95% confidence interval). We conclude that exclusive use of the NEP (no relay) provides greater HIV protection than NEP use involving syringe relay. The paradox is that public health goals will not be achieved by prohibiting syringe relay activities and promoting exclusive use. NEPs should broaden their education efforts to have participants understand the value of repeated visits to the NEP.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Des Jarlais DC, Friedmann P, Hagan H, Friedman SR. The protective effect of AIDS-related behavior change among injection drug users: a cross-national study.Am J Public Health. 1996;86:1780–1785.
Hurley SF, Jolley DJ, Kaldor JM. Effectiveness of needle-exchange programmes for prevention of HIV infection.Lancet. 1997;349:1797–1800.
Lurie P, Reingold AL.The Public Health Impact of Needle Exchange Programs in the US and Abroad. Rockville, MD: CDC National AIDS Clearinghouse; 1993.
Normand J, Vlahov D, Moses LE., eds.Preventing HIV Transmission: the Role of Sterile Needles and Bleach. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, National Research Council, Institute of Medicine; 1995.
Vlahov D, Junge B, Brookmeyer R, et al. Reductions in high-risk drug use behaviors among participants in the Baltimore needle exchange program.J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1997;16:400–406.
Klee H., Morris J. The role of needle exchagne in modifying sharing behavior: cross-study comparisons 1989–1993.Addiction. 1995;90:1635–1645.
Vlahov D, Junge B. The role of needle exchange programs in HIV prevention.Public Health Rep. 1998;113(S1):75–80.
Bauman KE, Ennett ST. On the importance of peer influence for adolescent drug use: commonly neglected considerations.Addiction. 1996;91:185–198.
Grund JPC, Friedman SR, Stern LS., et al. Syringe-mediated drug sharing among injecting drug users: patterns, social context and implications for transmission of blood-borne pathogens.Soc Sci Med. 1996;42:691–703.
Magura S, Grossman JI, Lipton DS, et al. Determinants of needle sharing among intravenous drug users.Am J Public Health. 1989;79(4):459–462.
Needle RH, Coyle SL, Genser SG, Trotter R. Social networks, drug abuse, and HIV transmission.NIDA Res Monogr. 1995;151.
Valente TW, Foreman RK, Junge B, Vlahov D. Satellite exchange in the Baltimore needle exchange program.Public Health Rep. 1998;113(S1):90–96.
Des Jarlais DC, Marmor M, Paone D, et al. HIV incidence among injecting drug users in New York City syringe exchange programmes.Lancet. 1996;348:987–991.
Kaplan EH, Heimer R. HIV prevalence among intravenous drug users: model-based estimates from New Haven's legal needle exchange.J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1992;5(2):163–169.
Guydish J, Clark G, Garcia D. Downing M, Case P, Sorensen JL. Evaluating needle exchange: do distributed needles come back?Am J Public Health. 1991;81:617–618.
Guydish J, Bucardo J, Clark G, Bernheim S. Evaluating needle exchange: a description of client characteristics, health status, program utilization, and HIV risk behavior.Subst Use Misuse. 1998;33:1173–1196.
Kaplan EH. Needles that kill: modeling human immunodeficiency virus transmission via shared drug injection equipment in shooting galleries.Rev Infect Dis. 1989;11(2): 289–298.
Strathdee SA, Patrick DM, Archibald CP, et al. Social determinants predict needle-sharing behavior among injection drug users in Vancouver, Canada.Addiction. 1997;92: 1339–1347.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Valente, T.W., Foreman, R.K., Junge, B. et al. Needle-exchange participation, effectiveness, and policy: Syringe relay, gender, and the paradox of public health. J Urban Health 78, 340–349 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.2.340
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.2.340