Skip to main content

Setting the agenda for urban bioethics

Abstract

Urban bioethics has two goals. First, it aims to focus attention on neglected bioethical problems that have particular salience in urban settings. Three problems are highlighted: socioeconomic inequality as a major determinant of health inequality, the foundations of an ethic for public health, and the impact of social context on the therapeutic alliance between patients and physicians. Second, urban bioethics serves as a vehicle for raising deep theoretical and methodological questions about the dominant assumptions and approaches of contemporary bioethics. Demands for cultural sensitivity, so pronounced in the urban context, compel us to reexamine the central commitment in bioethics to personal autonomy. The multiculturalism of urban life also argues for a dialogic approach to bioethical problem solving rather than the monologic approach that characterizes most bioethical thinking. Although my brief for redirecting bioethics will resonate with many critics who do not consider themselves urban bioethicsts, I argue that there are special advantages in using urban bioethics to expose the limitations of contemporary bioethical paradigms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Tong R. Feminist Approaches to Bioethics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roberts LW, Battaglia J, Smithpeter M, Epstein RS. An office on main street: health care dilemmas in small communities. Hastings Cent Rep. 1999;29(4):28–37.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wirth L. Urbanism as a way of life. In: LeGates RT, Stout F, eds. The City Reader. New York: Routledge; 1996:189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hurowitz J. Toward a social policy for health. New Engl J Med. July 8, 1993;329(2): 130–133.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Daniels N, Kennedy B, Kawachi I. Why justice is good for our health: the social determinants of health. Daedalus. 1999;128:215–251.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Andrulis DP, Goodman NJ. The Social and Health Landscape of Urban and Suburban America. Chicago: AHA Press, Health Forum, Inc.; 1999:25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brock D. Broadening the bioethics agenda. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2000;10(1):21–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mann J. Medicine and public health, ethics and human rights. Hastings Cent Rep. 1997; 27(3):6–13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rose G. Sickindividuals and sickpopulations. Int J Epidemiol. 1985;14(1):32–38.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodin R. No Smoking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffmaster B. Values in preventative medicine. Can Fam Physician, 1992;38:321–326.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brecher D, Egger R. Compliance: an urban nightmare. In: Birrer R, ed. Urban Family Medicine, New York: Springer-Verlag; 1987:58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bayer R. AIDS prevention and cultural sensitivity: are they compatible? Am J Public Health. 1994;84(6):895–898.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolf S. Commentary. In: Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pellegrino E. Prologue: intersections of Western biomedical ethics and world culture. In: Pellegrino E, Mazzarella P, Corsi P, eds. Transcultural Dimensions in Medical Ethics. Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group; 1992:13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gostin LO. Informed consent, cultural sensitivity, and respect for persons. JAMA. September 13, 1995;274(10):844–845.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, eds. Relational Autonomy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Appiah KA. Race, culture, identity: misunderstood connections. In: Appiah KA, Gutman A, eds. Color Conscious: the Political Morality of Race. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1996:30–105.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Blustein J. Multiculturalism and just health care: taking pluralism seriously. In: Battin M, Rhodes R, Silver A, eds. Multiculturalism and Just Health Care: Taking Pluralism Seriously. New York: Oxford University Press. In press.

  20. Raz J. Multiculturalism: a liberal perspective. Dissent. Winter 1994:67–79.

  21. Gutmann A, Thompson D. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Daniels N, Sabin J. Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philos Public Aff. 1997;26(4):303–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gutmann A, Thompson D. Deliberating about bioethics. Hastings Cent Rep. 1997; 27(3):38–41.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jaggar AM. Toward a feminist conception of moral reasoning. In: Sterba J, ed. Morality and Social Justice. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield; 1994: 115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Blustein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blustein, J. Setting the agenda for urban bioethics. J Urban Health 78, 7–20 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.1.7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.1.7

Keywords

  • Cultural Diversity
  • Cultural Sensitivity
  • Deliberative Democracy
  • Dialogic Bioethics
  • Feminist Practical Dialogue
  • Multiculturalism
  • Personal Autonomy
  • Public Health Ethics
  • Social Determinants of Health
  • Therapeutic Alliance
  • Urbanicity