Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 81, Issue 1, pp 79–93 | Cite as

Short-term impact of experience Corps® participation on children and schools: Results from a pilot randomized trial

  • George W. Rebok
  • Michelle C. Carlson
  • Thomas A. Glass
  • Sylvia McGill
  • Joel Hill
  • Barbara A. Wasik
  • Nicholas Ialongo
  • Kevin D. Frick
  • Linda P. Fried
  • Meghan D. Rasmussen


This article reports on the short-term impact of a school-based program using older adult volunteers and aimed at improved academic achievement and reduced disruptive classroom behavior in urban elementary school students. The Experience Corps® Baltimore (Maryland) program places a critical mass of older adult volunteers, serving 15 hours or more per week, in public schools to perform meaningful and important roles to improve the educational outcomes of children and the health and well-being of the volunteers. This article reports on the preliminary impact of the program on children in grades K-3. A total of 1,194 children in grades K-3 from six urban elementary schools participated in this pilot trial. At follow-up, third grade children whose schools were randomly selected for the program had significantly higher scores on a standardized reading test than children in the control schools, and there was a nonsignificant trend for improvement in alphabet recognition and vocabulary ability among kindergarten children in the program. Office referrals for classroom misbehavior decreased by about half in the Experience Corps schools, but remained the same in the control schools. Teachers had somewhat more favorable attitudes toward senior volunteers as a result of having older volunteers in the classroom, although the difference between the intervention and control schools was not statistically significant. In this pilot trial, the Experience Corps program led to selective improvements in student reading/academic achievement and classroom behavior while not burdening the school staff.


Academic achievement Classroom behavior Childhood education Literacy development 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Fried LP, Carlson M, Freedman M, et al. A social model for health promotion for an aging population: initial evidence on the Experience Corps model. J Urban Health. 2004;81:64–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Denham TE, Smith CW. The influence of grandparents on grandchildren: a review of the literature and resources. Family Relations. 1989;38:345–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pearson JL, Hunter AG, Ensminger ME, Kellam SG. Black grandmothers in multigenerational households: diversity in family structure and parenting involvement in the Woodlawn community. Child Dev. 1990;61:434–442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Newman S, Latimer B. Senior Citizen School Volunteer Program: Report on Cumulative Data_1988–1995. Pittsburgh, PA: Generations Together, University of Pittsburgh; 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    National Educational Goals Panel. Reading Achievement State by State, 1999. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1999.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Teale WH. Reading aloud to young children as a classroom instructional activity: insights from research and practice. In van Kleeck A, Stahl SA, Bauer EB, eds. On Reading Books to Children: Parents and Teachers. Center for Improvement of Early Reading Achievement, CIERA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2003:114–135.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hiebert EH. Reading recovery in the United States: what difference does it make to an age cohort? Educ Res. 1994;23:15–25.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leslie L, Allen L. Factors that predict success in an early literacy intervention program. Reading Res Q. 1999;34:404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meyer BJ, Middlemiss W, Theodorou E, Brezinski KL, McDougall J, Bartlett BJ. Effects of structure strategy instruction delivered to fifth-grade children using the Internet with and without the aid of older adult tutors. J Educ Psychol. 2002;94:486–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stanovich KE. Matthew-effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Res Q. 1986;21:360–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Woodruff LB. The effects of story exposure, instructional group size, and pre-kindergarten experience on story comprehension and receptive vocabulary in kindergarten children. Diss Abs Int, 2001;61(8-A);3059. United States: University Microfilms International.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pinnell GS, Lyons CA, DeFord DE, Bryk AS, Seltzer M. Comparing instructional models for the literacy education of high-risk first graders. Reading Res Q. 1994;29:9–39.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wasik BA, Bond MA. Beyond the pages of a book: interactive book reading and language development in preschool classrooms. J Educ Psychol. 2001;93:243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ewers CA, Brownson SM. Kindergarteners’ vocabulary acquisition as a function of active vs. passive storybook reading, prior vocabulary, and working memory. Reading Psychol. 1999;20:11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hiebert EH, Taylor BM. Beginning reading instruction: research on early interventions. In Kamil ML, Mosenthal PB, eds. Handbook of Reading Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2003;3:455–482.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karweit N, Wasik BA. The effects of story reading programs on literacy and language development of disadvantaged preschoolers. J Educ Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR). 1996;1:319–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wasik BA. Using volunteers as reading tutors: guidelines for effective practices Reading Teacher. 2001;51:562–570.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lloyd DN. Prediction of school failure from third grade data. Educ Psychol Meas. 1978;38:1193–1200.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kellam SG, Rebok GW. Building etiological theory through developmental epidemiologically-based preventive intervention trials. In McCord J, Tremblay RE, eds. Preventing Antisocial Behavior: Interventions From Birth Through Adolescence. New York: Guilford Press; 1992:162–195.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kellam SG, Mayer LS, Rebok GW, Hawkins WE. Effects of improving achievement on aggressive behavior and of improving aggressive behavior on achievement through two preventive interventions: an investigation of causal paths. In: Dohrenwend B, ed. Adversity, Stress, and Psychopathology. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1998:486–505.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Crijnen AAM, Feehan M, Kellam SG. The course and malleability of reading achievement in elementary school: the application of growth curve modeling in the evaluation of a Mastery Learning intervention. Learning Individual Differences. 1998;10:137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Freedman M, Fried L. Launching Experience Corps: Findings From a 2-Year Pilot Project Mobilizing Older Americans to Help Inner-City Elementary Schools Oakland, CA: Civic Ventures; January 1999.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Project Star. Seniors for Schools Evaluation Report. 1998–99 School Year. San Mateo, CA: Project Star; 2000.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Friedman IA, Kass E. Teacher self-efficacy: a classroom-organization conceptualization. Teaching Teacher Educ. 2002;18:675–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fried LP, Freedman M, Endres TE, Wasik B. Building communities that promote successful aging. West J Med. 1997;167:216–219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Glass TA, Carlson M, Hill J, et al. Experience Corps: Design of an intergenerational program to boost social capital and promote the health of an aging society. J Urban Health. 2004;81:94–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Frick KD, Carlson M, Glass TA, et al. Modeled cost-effectiveness of the Experience Corps based on the pilot randomized trial in Baltimore. J Urban Health. 2004;81:106–117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    DeBuono BA. Improving urban health. J Urban Health. 1998;75:263–271.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dunn LM, Dunn LM. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—Third Edition (PPVT-III). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 1997.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Washington J, Craig H. Performances of African American preschoolers on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-II. Language Speech Hearing Serv Schools. 1999;30:75–82.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    TerraNova CTBS Multiple Assessments Edition, Grades 1–12. Monterey, CA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Partnership for Youth Initiative. School Climate Survey. Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Exodus: a Study of Teacher Retention in America—50 Who Stayed, 50 Who Left. Washington, DC: AARP; September 2003;1–31.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kellam SG. Community and institutional partnerships for school violence prevention. In Kellam SG, Prinz R, Sheley JF, eds. Preventing School Violence: Plenary Papers of the 1999 Conference on Criminal Justice Research and Evaluation- Enhancing Policy and Practice Through Research. Vol. 2. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs; 2000.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guerra NG, Huesmann LR, Spindler A. Community violence exposure, social cognition, and aggression among urban elementary school children. Child Dev. 2003;74:1561–1576.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Grossman DC, Neckerman HJ, Koepsell TD, et al. Effectiveness of a violence prevention curriculum among children in elementary school. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997;277:1605–1611.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • George W. Rebok
    • 1
  • Michelle C. Carlson
    • 1
  • Thomas A. Glass
    • 1
  • Sylvia McGill
    • 1
  • Joel Hill
    • 1
  • Barbara A. Wasik
    • 1
  • Nicholas Ialongo
    • 1
  • Kevin D. Frick
    • 1
  • Linda P. Fried
    • 1
  • Meghan D. Rasmussen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mental HealthThe Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimore

Personalised recommendations