Sexual networks and sexually transmitted infections: A tale of two cities
- 265 Downloads
Research on risk behaviors for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has revealed that they seldom correspond with actual risk of infection. Core groups of people with high-risk behavior who form networks of people linked by sexual contact are essential for STI transmission, but have been overlooked in epidemiological studies. Social network analysis, a subdiscipline of sociology, provides both the methods and analytical techniques to describe and illustrate the effects of sexual networks on STI transmission. Sexual networks of people from Colorado Springs, Colorado, and from Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, infected with chlamydia during a 6-month period were compared. In Winnipeg, 442 networks were identified, comprising 571 cases and 663 contacts, ranging in size from 2 to 20 individuals; Colorado Springs data yielded 401 networks, comprising 468 cases and 700 contacts, ranging in size from 2 to 12 individuals. Taking differing partner notification methods and the slightly smaller population size in Colorado Springs into account, the networks from both places were similar in both size and structure. These smaller, sparsely linked networks, peripheral to the core, may form the mechanism by which chlamydia can remain endemic, in contrast with larger, more densely connected networks, closer to the core, which are associated with steep rises in incidence.
KeywordsCanada Chlamydia Colorado Gonorrhea Models/statistical Review Sexual partners Sexually transmitted diseases/epidemiology United States
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Aral SO, Holmes KK. Epidemiology of sexual behavior and sexually, transmitted diseases. In: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Mardh P-A, Lemon SM, Stamm WE, Piot P, Wasserheit JN, eds., Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2nd ed. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Information Services Company; 1990:19–36.Google Scholar
- 7.US Department of Health and Human Services. Sexual behavior among high school students—United States, 1990. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1992;40:885–888.Google Scholar
- 8.King AJC, Beazeley RP, Warren WK, Hankins CA. Canada Youth and AIDS Study. Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Social Program and Evaluation Group, Queen's University; 1988;1–147.Google Scholar
- 15.Laumann EO, Gagnon JH, Michael RT, Michaels S. The Social Organization of Sexuality; Sexual Practices in the United States. 1st ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1994:1–718.Google Scholar
- 16.Brunham RC. Core group theory: a central concept in STD epidemiology. Venereology. 1997;10:34–39.Google Scholar
- 21.Wasserman S, Faust K Social Network Analysis. 1st ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1994:34.Google Scholar
- 23.Potterat JJ, Muth SQ, Bethea R.P. Chronicle of a gang STD outbreak foretoldree Inquiry Creative Sociol. 1996;24:11–16.Google Scholar
- 31.Wylie JL, Maclean I, Brunham R, Craig C, Jolly AM. Gonorrhea types and sexual networks in Manitoba, Canada. Paper presented at: Sunbelt 19th International Sunbelt Social Network Conference; February 18–21, 1999; Charleston, SC.Google Scholar
- 37.Centers for Disease, Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 1996. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1997;1–104.Google Scholar
- 42.Anderson RM, May RM. Infectious Diseases of Humans; Dynamics and Control. 1st ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1992;234.Google Scholar
- 49.Communicable Disease Control. Notifiable Diseases Manitoba: CDC Unit Annual Review; Calendar Year 1996. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: Manitoba Health; 1997.Google Scholar