Bioethics in a different tongue: The case of truth-telling
- 417 Downloads
After a survey of 800 seniors from four different ethnic groups showed that Korean-American and Mexican-American subjects were much less likely than their European-American and African-American counterparts to believe that a patient should be told the truth about the diagnosis and prognosis of a terminal illness, we undertook an ethnographic study to look more deeply at attitudes and experiences of these respondents. European-American and African-American respondents were more likely to view truth-telling as empowering, enabling the patient to make choices, while the Korean-American and Mexican-American respondents were more likely to see the truth-telling as cruel, and even harmful, to the patients. Further differences were noted in how the truth should be told and even in definitions of what constitutes “truth” and “telling”. Clinical and bioethics professionals should be aware of how their cultural and economic backgrounds influence the way they perceive ethical dilemmas and remember to make room for the diverse views of the populations they serve.
KeywordsAdvance Directive Patient Autonomy Cone Biopsy Advance Care Directive Terminal Prognosis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Sachs GA, Stocking CB, Miles SH. Empowering the older patient? A randomized controlled trial to increase discussion and use of advance directives. J Am Geriatric Soc. 1992;40:269–273.Google Scholar