Advertisement

Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 78, Issue 1, pp 59–71 | Cite as

Bioethics in a different tongue: The case of truth-telling

  • Leslie J. Blackhall
  • Gelya Frank
  • Sheila Murphy
  • Vicki Michel
Special Feature: Urban Bioethics

Abstract

After a survey of 800 seniors from four different ethnic groups showed that Korean-American and Mexican-American subjects were much less likely than their European-American and African-American counterparts to believe that a patient should be told the truth about the diagnosis and prognosis of a terminal illness, we undertook an ethnographic study to look more deeply at attitudes and experiences of these respondents. European-American and African-American respondents were more likely to view truth-telling as empowering, enabling the patient to make choices, while the Korean-American and Mexican-American respondents were more likely to see the truth-telling as cruel, and even harmful, to the patients. Further differences were noted in how the truth should be told and even in definitions of what constitutes “truth” and “telling”. Clinical and bioethics professionals should be aware of how their cultural and economic backgrounds influence the way they perceive ethical dilemmas and remember to make room for the diverse views of the populations they serve.

Keywords

Advance Directive Patient Autonomy Cone Biopsy Advance Care Directive Terminal Prognosis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hare J, Nelson C. Will outpatients complete living wills? A comparison of two interventions. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:41–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sachs GA, Stocking CB, Miles SH. Empowering the older patient? A randomized controlled trial to increase discussion and use of advance directives. J Am Geriatric Soc. 1992;40:269–273.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caralis PV, Davis B, Wright K, Marcial E. The Influence of ethnicity and race on attitudes toward advance directives, life-prolonging treatments and euthanasia. J Clin Ethics. 1993;4:155–166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Teno JM, Fleishman J, Brock DW, Mor V. The use of Formal Prior Directives among patients with HIV-related diseases. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:490–494.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sugarman J, Weinberger M, Samsa G. Factors associated with veterans’decisions about living wills. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:343–347.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murphy ST, Palmer JM, Aze S, Frank G, Michel V, Blackhall LJ. Ethnicity and advance care directives. J Law Med Ethics. 1996;24:108–117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blackhall LJ, Murphy S, Frank G, Michel V, Azen S. Ethnicity and attitudes toward patient autonomy. JAMA. 1995;274:820–825.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leslie J. Blackhall
    • 1
  • Gelya Frank
    • 2
  • Sheila Murphy
    • 3
  • Vicki Michel
    • 4
  1. 1.Pacific Center for Health Policy and EthicsUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles
  2. 2.Department of Occupational MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles
  3. 3.Anhenberg School of CommunicationUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles
  4. 4.Loyola Law SchoolLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations