Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimal Designs for Stated Choice Experiments Generated From Fractional Factorial Designs

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article gives optimal designs obtained by developing a fractional factorial design for the estimation of main effects in stated choice experiments under the assumption of equal selection probabilities. This construction approach follows that of Burgess and Street (2005), who develop complete factorial designs to construct optimal designs for choice experiments, but we obtain choice experiments with fewer choice sets. We construct the fractional factorial designs using the Rao-Hamming method, which assumes all attributes have the same number of levels, which must be a prime or a prime power. We also find optimal designs for stated choice experiments that are generated from asymmetric fractional factorial designs constructed using expansive replacement under the same assumption. We use the multinomial logit model to analyze the results, and we make the assumption of equal selection probabilities when calculating optimality properties. The methods that we use to implement these constructions are given in the last section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bradley, R. A., and M. E. Terry. 1952. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39, 324–345.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, L., and D. J. Street. 2003. Optimal designs for 2k choice experiments. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods, 32, 2185–2206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, L., and D. J. Street. 2005. Optimal designs for choice experiments with asymmetric attributes. J. Stat. Plan. Inference, 134, 288–301.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, L., D. J. Street, and N. Wasi. 2011. Comparing designs for choice experiments: A case study. J. Stat. Theory Pract., 5, 25–46.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. T., J. J. Louviere, and E. Wei. 2009. Alternative Australian climate change plans: The public’s views. Energy Policy, 38, 902–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Helbawy, A. T., and R. A. Bradley. 1978. Treatment contrasts in paired comparisons: Large-sample results, applications, and some optimal designs. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 73, 831–839.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Graßhoff, U., H. Großmann, H. Holling, and R. Schwabe. 2004. Optimal designs for main effects in linear paired comparison models. J. Stat. Plan. Inference, 126, 361–376.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Graßhoff, U., and R. Schwabe. 2008. Optimal design for the Bradley-Terry paired comparison model. Stat. Methods Appl., 17, 275–289.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Großmann, H., H. Holling, U. Graßhoff, and R. Schwabe. 2007. A comparison of efficient designs for choices between two options. In MODA 8—Advances in model-oriented design and analysis, 83–90. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hamming, R. W. 1950. Error-detecting and error correcting codes. Bell System Tech. J., 29, 147–160.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat, A. S., N. J. A. Sloane, and J. Stufken. 1999. Orthogonal arrays: Theory and applications. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, S. R., and J. M. Rose. 2008. Stated choice experimentation, contextual influences and food choice: A case study. Food Quality Pref., 19, 539–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessels, R., B. Jones, P. Goos, and M. Vandebroek. 2009. An efficient algorithm for constructing Bayesian optimal choice designs. J. Business Econ. Stat., 27, 279–291.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lancsar, E. J., J. P. Hall, M. King, P. Kenny, J. J. Louviere, D. G. Fiebig, I. Hossain, F. C. K. Thien, H. K. Reddel, and C. R. Jenkins. 2007. Using discrete choice experiments to investigate subject preferences for preventive asthma medication. Respirology, 12, 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher, and J. D. Swait. 2000. Stated choice methods. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. 1947. Factorial experiments derivable from combinatorial arrangements of arrays. Suppl. J. R. Stat. Soc., 9, 128–139.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. 1949. On a class of arrangements. Proc. Edinbourough Math. Soc., 8, 119–125.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Street, D. J., and L. Burgess. 2004. Optimal and near-optimal pairs for the estimation of effects in 2-level choice experiments. J. Stat. Plan. Inference, 118, 185–199.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Street, D. J., and L. Burgess. 2007. The construction of optimal stated choice experiments: Theory and methods. Hoboken NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Street, D. J., L. Burgess, and J. J. Louviere. 2005. Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments. Int. J. Res. Marketing, 22, 459–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street, D. J., and L. Burgess. 2008. Some open combinatorial problems in the design of stated choice experiments. Discrete Math., 308, 2781–2788.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Train, K. E. 2003. Discrete choice methods with simulation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Bush.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bush, S. Optimal Designs for Stated Choice Experiments Generated From Fractional Factorial Designs. J Stat Theory Pract 8, 367–381 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2013.805451

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2013.805451

AMS Subject Classification

Keywords

Navigation