Abstract
The analysis of results of a series of experiments repeated at several environments with the same set of plant varieties (genotypes) is usually based on a mixed effects model. Because of possible different responses of the varieties to variable environmental conditions, the standard mixed model for that analysis becomes questionable. Therefore, a more general mixed model is to be considered. However, in its most general form it involves usually a large number of variance and covariance components to be estimated. This causes computational problems, even when using advanced algorithms, unless some simplifying structures are imposed on the general covariance matrix. It has appeared, that these problems can be avoided when adopting a classic method proposed by Rao (1972). This method has been explored recently by Calinski, Czajka, Kaczmarek, Krajewski, and Pilarczyk (2005). The purpose of the present paper is to show the use of that and some other theoretical results of C. Radhakrishna Rao in detail.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Caliński, T., Czajka, S., Kaczmarek, Z., Krajewski, P., Pilarczyk, W., 2005. Analyzing multi-environment variety trials using randomization-derived mixed models. Biometrics, 61, 448–455.
Demidenko, E., 2004. Mixed Models: Theory and Applications. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey.
Denis, J.-B., Piepho, H.-P., van Eeuwijk, F. A., 1997. Modelling expectation and variance for genotype by environment data. Heredity, 79, 162–171.
Gilmour, A. R., Thompson, R., Cullis, B. R., 1995. Average information REML: An efficient algorithm for variance parameter estimation in linear mixed models. Biometrics, 51, 1440–1450.
Gogel, B. J., Cullis, B. R., Verbyla, A. P., 1995. REML estimation of multiplicative effects in multi-environment variety trials. Biometrics, 51, 744–749.
Nair, K. R., 1944. The recovery of inter-block information in incomplete block designs. Sankhyā, 6, 383–390.
Nelder, J. A., 1954. The interpretation of negative components of variance. Biometrika, 41, 544–548.
Nelder, J. A., 1965. The analysis of randomized experiments with orthogonal block structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series A, 283, 147–178.
Nelder, J. A., 1968. The combination of information in generally balanced designs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 30, 303–311.
Patterson, H. D., Silvey, V., 1980. Statutory and recommended list trials of crop varieties in the United Kingdom (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 143, 219–252.
Patterson, H. D., Thompson, R., 1975. Maximum likelihood estimation of components of variance. In Corsten, L. C. A. and Postelnicu, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Biometric Conference, 197–207. Editura Academiei, Bucureşti.
Patterson, H. D., Williams, E. R., 1976. A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs. Biometrika, 63, 83–92.
Rao, C. R., 1947. General methods of analysis for incomplete block designs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 42, 541–561.
Rao, C. R., 1956. On the recovery of inter-block information in varietal trials. Sankhyā, 17, 105–114.
Rao, C. R., 1959. Expected values of mean squares in the analysis of incomplete block experiments and some comments based on them. Sankhyā, 21, 327–336.
Rao, C. R., 1970. Estimation of heteroscedastic variances in linear models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 161–172.
Rao, C. R., 1971. Estimation of variance and covariance components—MINQUE theory. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 1, 257–275.
Rao, C. R., 1972. Estimation of variance and covariance components in linear models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 112–115.
Rao, C. R., 1973. Representations of best linear unbiased estimators in the Gauss-Markoff model with a singular dispersion matrix. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 3, 276–292.
Rao, C. R., 1979. MINQUE theory and its relation to ML and MML estimation of variance components. Sankhyā, Series B, 41, 138–153.
Rao, C.R. and Kleffe, J., 1988. Estimation of Variance Components and Applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Rao, C.R. and Toutenburg, H., 1999. Linear Models: Least Squares and Alternatives. Springer, New York.
Smith, A., Cullis, B., Gilmour, A., 2001a. The analysis of crop variety evaluation data in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 43, 129–145.
Smith, A., Cullis, B., Thompson, R., 2001b. Analyzing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trend. Biometrics, 57, 1138–1147.
White, R. F., 1975. Randomization in the analysis of variance. Biometrics, 31, 555–571.
Yates, F., 1936a. Incomplete randomized blocks. Annals of Eugenics, 7, 121–140.
Yates, F., 1936b. A new method of arranging variety trials involving a large number of varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, 26, 424–455.
Yates, F., 1939. The recovery of inter-block information in variety trials arranged in three-dimensional lattices. Annals of Eugenics, 9, 136–156.
Yates, F., 1940a. Lattice squares. Journal of Agricultural Science, 30, 672–687.
Yates, F., 1940b. The recovery of inter-block information in balanced incomplete block designs. Annals of Eugenics, 10, 317–325.
Yates, F., Cochran, W. G., 1938. The analysis of groups of experiments. Journal of Agricultural Science, 28, 556–580.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caliński, T. On Some Results of C. Radhakrishna Rao Applicable to the Analysis of Multi-Environment Variety Trials. J Stat Theory Pract 1, 347–356 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2007.10411845
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2007.10411845