Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Canadian and United States Students’ Performances on the OECD’s PISA 2012 Problem-Solving Assessment

  • Article
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents an overview of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012 Problem-Solving assessment. The assessment examined the capabilities of 15-year-olds in 40 nations and four large international cities, as well as the Canadian Provinces, to solve a set of 16 problem units presented in contextualized situations. These units each had two or three tasks for students to solve. Students’ performances on these items served as a basis for developing the PISA score scale and the associated proficiency levels for each of the participating entities. Student performances on the PISA 2012 mathematics, reading, and science assessments provided an avenue to estimating student performances on the problem-solving assessment for students having similar score backgrounds in the three content areas. Student performances were also examined by item types and by differing problem situations. These latter two analyses provide interesting perspectives for comparing problem solving profiles across the participating entities. Finally, some conclusions are drawn concerning the study as a whole.

Résumé

Cet article présente dans ses grandes lignes l’Évaluation PISA 2012 en résolution de problèmes, de l’OCDE. Cette évaluation analyse les compétences de jeunes de 15 ans dans 40 pays, 4 grandes villes internationales, et aussi dans les provinces canadiennes, pour résoudre une série de 16 unités de problèmes présentés en contexte. Chacune de ces unités comprenait 2 ou 3 tâches à faire résoudre par les élèves. Leurs performances dans chacune de ces tâches ont servi à mettre au point l’échelle de pointage du PISA et les niveaux de compétences liés à chacun des groupes participants. Les performances des étudiants à l’évaluation du PISA 2012 en mathématiques, en lecture, et en sciences ont ouvert une voie permettant d’estimer quelles seraient les performances en résolution de problèmes des élèves ayant obtenu des scores comparables dans les trois domaines de contenus. Les performances ont aussi été analysées par type d’élément et par type de situation problématique. Ces deux dernières analyses fournissent des perspectives intéressantes permettant de comparer différents profils de résolution de problèmes dans tous les groupes de participants. Enfin, nous tirons certaines conclusions au sujet de l’étude dans son ensemble.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buchner, A., & Funke, J. (1993). Finite-state automata: Dynamic task environments in problem solving research. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A(1), 83–118. doi:10.1080/14640749308401068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (2014). Assessment matters! Issue 6—How good are Canadian 15-year-olds at solving problems? Further results from PISA 2012. Toronto, Canada: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D. (1997). The logic of failure. Recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, G. A. (1966). Statistical analysis in psychology and education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frensch, P. A., & Funke, J. (Eds.). (1995a). Complex problem solving: The European perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frensch, P. A., & Funke, J. (1995b). Defnitions, traditions, and a general framework for understanding complex problem solving. In P. A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funke, J. (1993). Microworlds based on linear equation systems: A new approach to complex problem solving and experimental results. In G. Strube & K. F. Wender (Eds.), The cognitive psychology of knowledge: The German Wissenspsychologie project (pp. 313–330). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62663-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Funke, J. (2001). Dynamic systems as tools for analyzing human judgment. Thinking and Reasoning, 7(1), 69–89. doi:10.1080/13546780042000046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funke, J. (2010). Complex problem solving: A case for complex cognition? Cognitive Processing, 11, 133–142. doi:10.1007/s10339-009–0345-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (2006). Problem solving. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 287–303). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and fnancial literacy. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264190511-en

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2014a). PISA 2012 results: Creative problem solving: Students’ skills in tackling real-life problems (Vol. V). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfndings/PISA-2012-results-volume-V.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2014b). PISA 2012 technical report. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2014c). Explore PISA 2012 mathematics, problem solving and financial literacy test questions. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/test

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpot, R., Ramalingam, D., Dossey, J., & McCrae, B. (forthcoming). Factors that infuence the difculty of problem solving items. In B. Csapó, J. Funke, & A. Schleicher (Eds.), The nature of problem solving. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

  • Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Frensch, P. A. (Eds.). (1991). Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John A. Dossey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dossey, J.A., Funke, J. Canadian and United States Students’ Performances on the OECD’s PISA 2012 Problem-Solving Assessment. Can J Sci Math Techn 16, 92–108 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2015.1119332

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2015.1119332

Navigation