This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Burton, L. (1999). The practices of mathematicians: What do they tell us about coming to knowmathematics? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 121–141.
Carlson, M., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 45–75.
Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1986). On the aesthetics of mathematical thoughts. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(1), 2–10.
Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. (2001). APOS: Aconstructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In D. Holton et al. (Eds.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study (pp. 275–282). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hadamard, J. (1954). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
Harel, G. (2006). Mathematics education research, its nature, and its purpose: A discussion on Lester’s paper. Zentralblatt fuer Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(1), 58–62.
Hauk, S., & Tsay, J.-J. (2013). Using cases: Experts talk about their experiences. In S. Hauk, N. M. Kung, J.-J. Tsay, & E. Hsu (Eds.), Video cases for college mathematics instructor professional development. Retrieved from http://collegemathvideocases.org/pdf/UsingCases.pdf
Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., Weber, K., & Alcock, L. (2013). On mathematicians’ different standards when evaluating elementary proofs. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5, 270–282.
Kelly, A. E., & Lesh, R. A. (2000). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
LeCompte, M. D., Millroy, W. L., & Preissle, J. (Eds.). (1992). The handbook of qualitative research in education. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Mason, J. (2010). Mathematics education: Theory, practice andmemories over 50 years. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(3), 3–9.
McKnight, C., Magid, A., Murphy, T. J., & McKnight, M. (2000). Mathematics education research: A guide for the research mathematician. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Weber, K. (2014). Why and how mathematicians read proofs: Further evidence from a survey study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85, 161–173.
Poincaré, H. (1952). Science and method. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2000). Purposes and methods of research in mathematics education. Notices of the AMS, 47(6), 641–649.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). Research methods in (mathematics) education. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 435–488). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schoenfeld, A. H., & Hermann, D. J. (1982). Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 8(5), 484–494.
Selden, A. (2002). Two research traditions separated by a common subject: Mathematics and mathematics education (Tech. Rep. No. 2002-2). Cookeville, TN: Technological University Mathematics Department.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kontorovich, I. Reviewing Mathematics & Mathematics Education: Searching for Common Ground. Can J Sci Math Techn 14, 299–305 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2014.935529
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2014.935529