Abstract
Conceptually rich classroom learning environments can only be supported by teachers with appropriate mathematical knowledge. A lack of clarity exists as to whether or how such teacher knowledge might go beyond knowledge of the relevant curriculum. This study contributes to the field by investigating further examples of what appropriate teacher mathematical knowledge might be, as rooted and contextualized in teachers’ daily classroom practices. Teacher journaling, individual meetings, and teacher focus-group discussions were used to identify relevant examples, and ultimately continue to collectively describe, in a specific, contextually based and practitioner-developed manner, the mathematical knowledge required for elementary teaching.
Résumé
Un environnement d’apprentissage riche en concepts doit se fonder avant tout sur des enseignants qui possèdent des connaissances mathématiques appropriées. Cependant, il n’est pas clair si ou comment ce niveau de connaissance peut aller au-delà des connaissances pertinentes pour le curriculum. Cette étude analyse certains exemples de ce qui pourrait constituer des connaissances mathématiques appropriées, telles que contextualisées dans les pratiques quotidiennes des enseignants dans leur classe. Des comptes-rendus sous forme de journal, des rencontres individuelles et des discussions de groupe ont permis de définir nombre d’exemples pertinents, et continuent de contribuer à une description collective, fondée sur le contexte et l’expérience dans la classe, des connaissances mathématiques requises pour l’enseignement au primaire.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In B. Davis & E. Simmt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 3–14). Edmonton, AB: Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group/Groupe Canadien d’Edude en Didactique des Mathematiques.
Ball, D. L., Bass, H., & Hill, H. C. (2004). Knowing and using mathematical knowledge in teaching: Learning what matters. In A. Buffler & R. C. Laugksch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Sciences, and Technology Education, Durban: SAARMSTE.
Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(3), 14–46. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/issues/fall2005/BallF05.pdf
Ball, D., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Barbeau, E. J., & Taylor, P. J. (2005). Challenging mathematics in and beyond the classroom: Discussion document. Retrieved April 7, 2008, from http://www.amt.edu.au/icmis16dd.html
Bednarz, N., Maheux, J., & Barry, S.(2007). Context-based professional development in mathematics education: Analysis of a collaborative research process aimed at supporting it. In T. Lamberg & L. R. Wiest (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group of the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 788–795). Stateline, NV: University of Nevada, Reno.
Boaler, J. (2000). Exploring situated insights into research and learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 113–119.
Boaler, J., & Humphreys, C. (2005). Connecting mathematical ideas: Middle School video cases to support teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Carlson, M. P., Bowling, S., Moore, K., & Ortiz, A. (2007). The role of the facilitator in promoting meaningful discourse among professional learning communities of secondary mathematics and science teachers. In T. Lamberg & L. R. Wiest (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group of the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 841–848). Stateline, NV: University of Nevada, Reno.
Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2003). Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 137–167.
Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2006). Mathematics-for-teaching: An on-going investigation of the mathematics that teachers (need to) know. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 293–319.
Doerr, H., & Lesh, R. (2003). A modeling perspective on teacher development. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 125–139). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fosnot, C. T., & Dolk, M. (2001). Young mathematicians at work: Constructing multiplication and division. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Gadanidis, G., & Namukasa, I. C. (2007). Mathematics-for-teachers (and students). Journal of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 13–22.
Heck, D. J., Banilower, E. R., Weiss, I. R., & Rosenberg, S. L. (2008). Studying the effects of professional development: Case of the NSF’s local systemic change through teacher initiative. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(2), 113–150.
Hill, H., Sleep, L., Lewis, J., & Ball, D. (2007). Assessing teachers’ mathematical knowledge: What knowledge matters and what evidence counts. In F. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 111–156). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Kahan, J., Cooper, D., & Bethea, K. (2003). The role of mathematics teachers’ content knowledge in their teaching: A framework for researchers applied to a study of teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 223–252.
Kajander, A. (2007). Unpacking mathematics for teaching: A study of preservice elementary teachers’ evolving mathematical understandings and beliefs. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 33–54.
Kajander, A., Keene, A. J., Siddo, R., & Zerpa, C. (2006). Effects of professional development on intermediate teachers’ knowledge and beliefs related to mathematics. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education.
Kajander, A., & Mason, R. (2007). Examining teacher growth in professional learning groups for in-service teachers of mathematics. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 7(4), 417–438.
Langham, B., Sundberg, S., & Goodman, T. (2006). Developing algebraic thinking: An academy model for professional development. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 11(7), 318–323.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Moreira, P. C., & David, M. M. (2008). Academic mathematics and mathematical knowledge needed in school teaching practice: Some conflicting elements. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(1), 23–40.
National Council on Teacher Quality. (2008). No common denominator: The preparation of elementary teachers in mathematics by America’s education schools. Retrieved July 7, 2008, from http://www.nctq.org/p/publications/reports.jsp
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Retrieved July 7, 2008, from http://www.mictm.orgéNationalMAPReport.pdf
Philipp, R. A., Ambrose, R., Lamb, L. L. C., Sowder, J. T., Schappelle, B. P., Sowder, L., et al. (2007). Effects of early field experiences on the mathematical content knowledge and beliefs of prospective elementary school teachers: An experimental study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 438–476.
Proulx, J. (2008). Exploring school mathematics as a source for pedagogic reflections in teacher education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 8(4), 331–354.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Silverman, J., & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Toward a framework for the development of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(6), 499–511.
Skemp, R. (1986). The psychology of learning mathematics. New York: Penguin.
Stein, M., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–369). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Stylianides, A. J., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Understanding and describing mathematical knowledge for teaching: Knowledge about proof for engaging students in the activity of proving. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(4), 307–332.
Weller, K., Arnon, I., & Dubinsky, E. (2009). Preservice teachers’ understanding of the relationship between a fraction or integer and its decimal expansion. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 9(1), 5–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was funded by the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada University of Manitoba CRYSTAL grant Understanding the Dynamics of Risk and Protective Factors in Promoting Success in Science and Mathematics Education.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kajander, A. Teachers Constructing Concepts of Mathematics for Teaching and Learning: “It’s like the roots beneath the surface, not a bigger garden”. Can J Sci Math Techn 10, 87–102 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/14926151003778274
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14926151003778274