Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Eloquent and Argumentative Treatise on the History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science for School Science

  • Review/Recension
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bell, R. L. (2006). Perusing Pandora’s box: Exploring the what, when, and how of nature of science instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 427–446). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, J. L. (2008). Private profit, science and science education: Critical problems and possibilities for action. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Education, 8(4), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. & Pinch, T. (1993). The Golem: What everyone should know about science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S., Osborne, J., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2001, April). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1995). Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science. In S. Jasonoff, G. Markle, J. Peterson, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology Studies (pp. 140–166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loving, C. C. (1991). The scientific theory profile: A philosophy of science model for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 823–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J. (1999). The cancer stage of capitalism. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R., & Wittrock, M. (1985). The generative learning model and its implications for science education. Studies in Science Education, 12, 59–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (2001). Learning science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 768–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, J. (1984). An introduction to science studies: The philosophical and social aspects of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. OISE, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    John Lawrence Bencze

Authors
  1. John Lawrence Bencze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bencze, J.L. An Eloquent and Argumentative Treatise on the History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science for School Science. Can J Sci Math Techn 9, 276–288 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150903226210

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150903226210

Search

Navigation