Skip to main content
Log in

Reconnecting to the Natural World through an Immersive Environment

  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The appeal of the Niagara Parks Butterfly Conservatory, a site visited by more than half a million visitors a year, is undeniable. One of the reasons for this appeal, we believe, is the fact that many people today feel increasingly disconnected from the natural world and therefore seek places that rekindle connections to nature. In this paper, we explore (a) how this immersive environment offers visitors connections to the natural world and restorative experiences, and (b) how far restorative experiences can raise ecological knowledge and action. Over a four-month period, we interviewed six staff about their own and visitors’ perceptions of the Butterfly Conservatory. We also conducted structured conversational interviews with 45 visitors 18 years and older at the Butterfly Conservatory and asked them to complete exit questionnaires. Observational field notes provided additional data for this study. We discuss our findings in relation to an environmental psychology framework that identifies four properties of restorative experiences—being away, fascination, extent or immersion, and compatibility. To this framework, we add a fifth and significant dimension—synergy from and with multi-sensory experiences. Our research suggests that visitors highly value being close to and connected with nature. Finally, restorative experiences do not necessarily translate into learning about stewardship or into raising ecological awareness in visitors. Rather, the restorative nature of the conservatory experience seems to overpower the ecological messages staff hoped people would take away from their visit.

Résumé

L’intérêt du Sanctuaire de papillons du parc Niagara, visité par plus d’un demi million de personnes chaque année, est indéniable. L’une des raisons de cet intérêt, à notre avis, est que de plus en plus de gens se sentent aujourd’hui détachés du monde naturel, et sont donc à la recherche de lieux susceptibles de leur permettre de renouer avec la nature. Dans cet article, nous nous penchons sur deux aspects en particulier: (a) de quelle façon cet environnement offre aux visiteurs des occasions de renouer avec le monde naturel et «refaire le plein d’énergie»; (b) dans quelle mesure ces expériences peuvent servir à sensibiliser les visiteurs aux questions écologiques. Au cours d’une période de quatre mois, nous avons interrogé six employés du parc sur leurs impressions personnelles et celles des visiteurs au sujet du Sanctuaire de papillons. Nous avons également réalisé des entrevues structurées avec 45 visiteurs de 18 ans et plus, à qui nous avons demandé de répondre à un questionnaire au terme de leur visite. Des notes d’observation prises sur le terrain fournissent des données supplémentaires pour cette étude. Nous analysons les résultats en rapport avec un cadre psychologique environnemental qui distingue quatre propriétés des expériences qui permettent de «refaire le plein»: le fait d’être ailleurs, la fascination, l’étendue ou l’immersion et la compatibilité. À ce cadre, nous ajoutons un cinquième aspect important: la synergie liée aux expériences multisensorielles. Notre recherche indique que les visiteurs accordent une grande importance à cette union avec la nature. Enfin, ces expériences ne se traduisent pas nécessairement chez les visiteurs par un apprentissage sur l’intendance ou une sensibilité accrue aux questions écologiques. En réalité, les aspects restaurateurs de l’expérience au Sanctuaire semblent beaucoup plus forts que les messages écologiques que le personnel espèrent transmettre aux visiteurs pendant leur séjour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burton, C., & Scott, C. (2003). Museums: Challenges for the 21st century. International Journal of Arts Management, 5(2), 56–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfly effect. (2006). Wikipedia. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect (accessed 27 January 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, J.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.). (2000). The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (1999). Practical evaluation guide: Tools for museums and other informal educational settings. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. (2001, February 21). The wings of spring. Globe and Mail: p. T7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, D., Dunne-Maxim, K., & Cernak, M.A. (2002). The science centre as sanctuary. Journal of Museum Education, 27(1), 22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, T.R., Maguire, C.P., & Nebel, M.B. (2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpela, K., & Hartig, T. (1996). Restorative qualities of favourite places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krakauer, T. (2001, Feb.). Butterfly houses: A lesson in conservation and sustainable development. Informal Learning Review, 46, 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (1998). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, Edward N. (1995). The essence of chaos. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, L.E., & Evans, G.W. (2002). Museums as learning settings: The importance of the physical environment. Journal of Museum Education, 27(1), 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olds, A.R. (1990). Sending them home alive. In E. Hooper-Greenhill (Ed.), Museums and their visitors (pp. 332–336). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J. (1998). Environmental education in the 21st century. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti, E., & Soren, B.J. (2002, April). Aesthetic aspects of science learning: The appeal of the butterfly conservatory experience. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R.L., & West, R.M. (2001). Lighting the way: How museums, zoos, and aquariums use lighting to provide an immersive experience. Informal Learning Review, 50, 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scopelliti, M., & Giuliani, M.V. (2004). Choosing restorative environments across the lifespan: A matter of place experience. Environmental Psychology, 24, 423–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ai]van den Berg, A.E., Koole, S.L., & van der Wulp, N. (2003). Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, N.M., & Evans, G.W. (2003). Nearby nature: A buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and behavior, 35(3), 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pedretti, E., Soren, B.J. Reconnecting to the Natural World through an Immersive Environment. Can J Sci Math Techn 6, 83–96 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150609556689

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150609556689

Navigation