Skip to main content
Log in

Can ‘pooling teaching tips’ be more than ‘pooling teaching tips’?

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is increasing interest in how academic development of various kinds influences university teaching and student learning. To date the focus has been on formal, expert-led opportunities to learn how to teach. Our institution has developed a less formal, participant-led forum for teaching staff that was initially established to share ideas on teaching techniques and skills. We report here on participant-led research that explores if and how this model of group learning works, and how it might relate to other models that have been applied to tertiary teaching development. Authors adopted a self-study research framework incorporating a collaborative autoethnography. The data emphasises how participants use this forum as a community of practice, as a means for deep engagement with learning about teaching, and as a means to rationally manage their learning against a backdrop of challenges associated with learning to teach in research-led higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur, L. (2016). Communities of practice in higher education: Professional learning in an academic career. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(3), 230–241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1127813

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. (1996). From scholarship reconsidered to scholarship assessed. Quest, 48(2), 129–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1996.1048418

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashmore, A. M., Cane, C., & Cane, R. (2013). Rebalancing promotion in the HE sector: Is teaching excellence being rewarded?. York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D., & Gardiner, D. (2015). An evaluation framework for identifying the effectiveness and impact of academic teacher development programmes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 46(September), 81–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.02.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Court, S. (1999). Negotiating the research imperative: The views of UK academics on their career opportunities. Higher Education Quarterly, 53(1), 65–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2273.00113

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, D., & Gordon, C. (2016). Rewarding educators and education leaders in research-intensive universities. Retrieved May 9, 2017, from https://doi.org/www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/rewarding_educators_and_education_leaders.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 87–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787404040463

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, R. (2015). Does teaching advance your academic career? Perspectives of promotion procedures in UK higher education. A report for the Royal Academy of Engineering Standing Committee for Education and Training. Retrieved May 9, 2017, from https://doi.org/www.raeng.org.uk/teachingpromotion

    Google Scholar 

  • Hains-Wesson, R., & Young, K. (2017). A collaborative autoethnography study to inform the teaching of reflective practice in STEM. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 297–310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1196653

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. L., Smith, L., & Worthington, K. (2008). Fitting the methodology with the research: An exploration of narrative, self-study and auto-ethnography. Studying Teacher Education, 4(2), 17–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17425960801976321

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Academy. (2017). Recognition and accreditation. Retrieved May 9, 2017, from https://doi.org/www.heacademy.ac.uk/recognition-accreditation

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2017). Teaching excellence framework: Year two additional guidance. Retrieved May 9, 2017, from https://doi.org/www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Pubs/2016/201632/HEFCE2016_32.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 31(5), 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., Lygo-Baker, S., Markless, S., Rienties, B., & Di Napoli, R. (2017). Conceptualizing impact in academic development: Finding a way through. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 116–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreber, C. (2011). Demonstrating fitness for purpose. In L. Stefani (Ed.), Evaluating the effectiveness of academic development: Principles and practice (pp. 45–58). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theorrectical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. L. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, R. (2004). Educational development: Discourse, identity and practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, C. (2013). Forward. In A. M. Cashmore, C. Cane, & R. Cane (Eds.), Rebalancing promotion in the HE sector: Is teaching excellence being rewarded? (pp. 4). York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathias, H. (2005). Mentoring on a programme for new university teachers: A partnership in revitalizing and empowering collegiality. International Journal for Academic Development, 70(2), 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Byrne, C., Schonthal, B., Shephard, K., Lie, C., & Townsend, S. (2016). Exploring the value and potential of peer-led models of teacher education. Proceedings of the Tertiary Education Research in New Zealand (TERNZ) Conference. Retrieved February 27, 2018, from https://doi.org/guidebook.com/guide/82933/event/14865534/

    Google Scholar 

  • Olive, V. (2017). How much is too much? Cross-subsidies from teaching to research in British universities (HEPI Report 100). Higher Education Policy Institute. Retrieved February 12, 2017, from https://doi.org/www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/HEPI-How-much-is-too-much-Report-100-FINAL.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, P. (1998). The courage to teach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. (2016). New models of tertiary education issues paper. Retrieved February 9, 2018, from https://doi.org/productivity.govt.nz/sites/default/files/tertiary-education-issues-paper.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P., & Moses, I. (1992). Associations between research and teaching in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 23(2), 273–295. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145017

    Google Scholar 

  • Remmik, M., Karm, M., Haamer, A., & Lepp, L. (2011). Early-career academics’ learning in academic communities. International Journal for Academic Development, 76(3), 187–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.596702

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, K., Harland, T., Stein, S., & Tidswell, T. (2011). Preparing an application for a higher-education teaching-excellence award: Whose foot fits Cinderella’s shoe? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(2), 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • TERNZ. (2016). Tertiary Education Research New Zealand Conference. Retrieved April 9, 2018, from https://doi.org/www.herdsa.org.nz/ternz/2016/

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748

    Google Scholar 

  • Times Higher Education World University Rankings. (2018). World university rankings. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://doi.org/www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings

    Google Scholar 

  • Universities New Zealand. (2017). Delivering quality teaching and learning. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://doi.org/www.universitiesnz.ac.nz/sector-research/delivering-quality-teaching-and-learning

    Google Scholar 

  • Viskovic, A. (2006). Becoming a tertiary teacher: Learning in communities of practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(2), 323–339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1127813

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, G. (1996). Understanding staff development. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, J., Turner, R., Spowart, L., Muneer, R., & Kneale, P. (2017). Evaluating academic development in the higher education sector: Academic developers’ reflections on using a toolkit resource. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 1503–1514. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1325351

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerry Shephard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Byrne, C., McIntyre, G., Lie, C. et al. Can ‘pooling teaching tips’ be more than ‘pooling teaching tips’?. Tert Educ Manag 24, 351–361 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2018.1465117

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2018.1465117

Keywords

Navigation