Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Zones of alienation in global higher education: corporate abuse and leadership failures

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Worldwide, academic ecosystems suffer from the industrialization of creative work and evaluative hegemony. Managerial obsession with growth has corroded collegiality, breeding mistrust, anxiety and burnout - negatively impacting the physical and mental health of faculty members. Concerned with benchmarking, audits and competitive self-assessment, academic managers generate accountability-heavy workloads, which are of doubtful value for critical inquiry, but a source of gratification for a metrics-minded bureaucracy and its coercive pace setters. Legitimized and propelled by the knowledge factories of global neoliberalism, this approach becomes particularly corrosive in the ‘zones of alienation’ created through the malignant interaction of two phenomena: ‘leaderism’ and ‘soldierism’. This paper explains how these phenomena emerge asa result of leadership failures and corporate abuse in global higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, R., & Lucero, M. (1996). Beyond resentment. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5, 86–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2000). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: Towards the performative society? The Australian Educational Researcher, 27(2), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2012). Performativity, commodifkation and commitment: An l-spy guide to the neoliberal university. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(1), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, C. (2014). The coming of the corporate-fascist university? New Political Science, 36(4), 640–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z., & Donskis, L. (2013). Moral blindness: The loss of sensitivity in liquid modernity. Maiden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beraha, L. (1996). The fxed fool: Raising and resisting picaresque mobility in Vladimir Vojnovic’s Conkin novels. The Slavic and East European Journal, 40(3), 475–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, J. L. (2007). Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. Academy of Management Review, 32, 641–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2009). Academic pedagogies, quality logics and performative universities: Evaluating teaching and what students want. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8), 857–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blandy, C. W. (2009). Provocation, deception, entrapment: The Russo-Georgian fve-day war. Shrivenham, UK: Defence Academy of the United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannella, G. S., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2017). Neoliberalism in higher education: Can we understand? Can we resist and survive? Can we become without neoliberalism? Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 17(3), 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. (2017). Where have all the fowers gone? In S. Riddle, M. K. Harmes, & P. A. Danaher (Eds.), Producing pleasure in the contemporary university. Bold visions in educational research, 59 Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSouza, E. R. (2011). Frequency rates and correlates of contrapower harassment in higher education. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(1), 158–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrat, N. (2016). The political economy of Russian higher education: Why does Putin support research universities? Post-Soviet Afairs, 32(4), 299–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. (1998). An introduction to the social psychology of insults in organizations. Human Relations, 5(11), 13–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, F. (2002). The foot soldiers of science. EMBO Reports, 3(11), 1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gildersleeve, R. E. (2017). The neoliberal academy of the anthropocene and the retaliation of the lazy academic. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 17(3), 286–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (2008). The militarization of US higher education after 9/11. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(5), 56–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, L. (2015, April–June). Bully university? The cost of workplace bullying and employee disengagement in American higher education. SAGE Open, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, H. (1996). Brutal bosses: And their prey. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. (2017). The smiling philosopher: Emotional labor, gender, and harassment in conference spaces. Education Philosophy and Theory, 1–9. doi:10.1080/0013187.2017.1343112

    Google Scholar 

  • Keashly, L., & Neuman, J. H. (2010). Faculty Experiences with bullying in higher education. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 32(1), 48–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuraev, A. (2016). Soviet higher education: An alternative construct to the western university paradigm. Higher Education, 71(2), 181–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2013). Research policy and academic performativity: Compliance, contestation and complicity. Studies in Higher Education, 38(8), 1162–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 165–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, B. (2013). Intellectual leadership in higher education: Renewing the role of the university professor. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, R., Arnold, D. H., Fratzl, J., & Thomas, R. (2008). Workplace bullying in academia: A Canadian study. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 20(2), 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, L. (2013). The rules of the game: Women and the leaderist turn in higher education. Gender and Education, 25(1), 116–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C. (2011). Higher education’s industrial model. In S. Best, R. Kahn, A. Nocella, & P. McLaren (Eds.), The global industrial complex: Systems of domination (pp. 155–168). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M. (2005). Democratizing knowledge: Higher education and good governance. In G. Jones, P. McCarney, & M. Skolnik (Eds.), Creating knowledge, strengthening nations: The changing role of higher education (pp. 101–105). Toronto: The University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleksiyenko, A. (2016). Higher education reforms and center-periphery dilemmas: Ukrainian universities between neo-soviet and neo-liberal contestations. In J. Zajda, & V. Rust (Eds.), Globalisation and higher education reforms (pp. 133–148). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleksiyenko, A. (2017). Enhancing university staff capacities for critical inquiry: Organizational change, professional development and cumulative powers in higher education. In G. Postiglione, & J. Jung (Eds.), The changing academic profession in Hong Kong (pp. 125–142). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Porath, C. L (2000). Assessing and attacking workplace incivility. Organizational Dynamics, 29, 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, J. (2017). Beyond intellectual slut shaming: Traversing Cartesian dualism, shame, and self-blame in the neoliberalized post-structuralist critical classroom. Cultural Studies → Critical Methodologies, 77(3), 182–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, C., Pullen, A., Vickers, M. H., Clegg, S. R., & Pitsis, A. (2010). Violence and workplace bullying. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 32(1), 96–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabic-EI-Rayess, A. (2014). Acting and reacting: Youth’s behavior in corrupt educational settings. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(1), 70–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R., & Cohen, C. (2004). Dangerous work: The gendered nature of bullying in the context of higher education. Gender, Work & Organization, 77(2), 163–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G., Corwin, Z. B., & Coylar, J. E. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G., & Lanford, M. (2014). The question of academic freedom: Universal right or relative term. Frontiers of Education in China, 9(1), 4–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, A., & Graham-Smith, G. (2012). Collegiality: Can it survive the corporate university? Social Dynamics, 38(1), 68–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. (2016). Toxic academic culture in East Asia. International Higher Education, 84, 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yudkevich, M. (2014). The Russian university: Recovery and rehabilitation. Studies in Higher Education, 39(8), 1463–1474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabrodska, K., Linnell, S., Laws, C, & Davies, B. (2011). Bullying as intra-active process in neoliberal universities. Qualitative Inquiry, 77(8), 709–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D., & Gross, C. (2001). Conflict escalation and coping with workplace bullying: A replication and extension. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 497–522.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Anatoly Oleksiyenko

Authors
  1. Anatoly Oleksiyenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anatoly Oleksiyenko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oleksiyenko, A. Zones of alienation in global higher education: corporate abuse and leadership failures. Tert Educ Manag 24, 193–205 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2018.1439095

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2018.1439095

Keywords

Search

Navigation