Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Valuing and evaluating community-engaged scholarship

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the nature of, and need for, evaluation of community-engaged university teaching and research. The research was conducted as part of a larger project aimed at improving institutional understanding of how to best support community-engaged university people. We interviewed 25 community-engaged colleagues, and used a general inductive approach to identify four recurring themes relating to evaluation within interview transcripts. The themes emphasised diverse conceptualisations of the nature of evaluation in this context, and concomitant concerns about where their community engagement fits within our higher education institution. Our research may help our institution, and others, to decide how best to provide institutional support to university people who choose to become community-engaged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, S., & Hedberg, J. G. (1994). Evaluating technology-based learning: Which model? In K. Beattie, C. McNaught, & S. Wills (Eds.), Interactive multimedia in university education: Designing for change in teaching and learning (A59 (pp. 233–244). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., Pipi, K., & Cassidy, T. (2015). Kaupapa Māori action research in a Whānau Ora collective: An exemplar of Māori evaluative practice and the findings. Evaluation Matters-He Take Tō Te Aromatawai, 1, 113–136. doi:10.18296/em.0006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, S., & Manners, P. (2012). Community-based participatory research: A guide to ethical principles and practice. Durham: Centre for Social Justice and Community Action, Durham University. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.publicengagement.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publication/ cbpr ethics guide web november 2012.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, L. W., Strauss, R. P., & Webb, L. (2012). Engaged scholarship at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: Campus integration and faculty development. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(1), 97–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, J. A. (2011). Positioning civic engagement on the higher education landscape: Insights from a civically engaged pedagogy. Tertiary Education and Management, 17(2), 101–115. doi:10.1080/13583883.2011.562523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1996). From scholarship reconsidered to scholarship assessed. Quest, 48, 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K., Shephard, K., Warren, D., Hesson, G, & Fleming, J. (2016). Using phenomenography to build an understanding of how university people conceptualise their community-engaged activities. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(4), 643–657. doi:10.1080/ 07294360.2015.1137880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Business Innovation & Skills. (2015). Higher education: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London. (10 August 2016) Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.gov.uk/government/consultations/higher-education-teaching-excellence-social-mobility-and-student-choice

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, K. (2000). Interviewing. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, (pp. 50–82). Victoria: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, A. (1996). Developing Critical Evaluation. Evaluation, 2(2), 173–188. doi:10.1177/ 135638909600200204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelmon, S., Holland, B., Driscoll, A., Spring, A., & Kerrigan, S. (2001). Assessing the impact of service-learning and civic engagement: Principles and methods. Providence, RI: Campus Compact.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelmon, S. B., Jordan, C., & Seifer, S. D. (2013). Community-engaged scholarship in the academy: An action agenda. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 45(4), 58–66. doi:10.1080/00091383.2013.806202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L., Jones, M., & Coutts, S. (2010). Partnerships and learning communities in work-integrated learning: Designing a community services student placement program. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(5), 547–559. doi:10.1080/07294360.2010.502288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesson, G., Moskal, A. C. M., & Shephard, K. (2014). Using visual analytics to explore Community Engaged Learning and Teaching at the University of Otago. In B. Hegarty, J. McDonald, & S. K. Loke (Eds.), Rhetoric and reality: critical perspectives on educational technology-conference, ASCILITE (pp. 500–504). Dunedin. Retrieved from https://doi.org/ascilite.org/conferences/dunedin2014/files/concisepapers/133-Hesson.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E. (1996). The problem of values in evaluation. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 8(1), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S. (2012). Kaupapa Māori theory-based evaluation. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 12(1). 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larran, M., & Andrades, F. J. (2017) Analysing the literature on university social responsibility: A review of selected higher education journals Higher Education Quarterly (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, S., & Archie, T. (2012). Approaches to evaluating the outcomes of faculty outreach, part I: Needs, opportunities and challenges, report to the office of university outreach. University of Colorado. (May 2016) Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.colorado.edu/eer/research/documents/CUoutreachNeedsReport fmal.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, P. (Ed.). (2011). University of Georgia Service-Learning Faculty Handbook. Retrieved from: Office of Service-Learning. https://doi.org/servicelearning.uga.edu/uploads/docs/UGA_Service Learning_Faculty_Handbook_5.4.11.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbah, M. F. (2016). Towards the idea of the interconnected university for sustainable community development. Higher Education Research & Development, 35, 1228–1241. doi:10.1080/ 07294360.2016.1144570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. (2016a, August 12) National Science Challenges. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.mbie.govt.nz/info-services/science-innova tion/national-science-challenges

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. (2016b, August 12) A Nation of curious minds — He Whenua Hihiri i te Mahara. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.curiousminds.nz

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Productivity Commission — Te Komihana Whai Hua o Aotearoa. (2016). New Models of Tertiary Education: Issues paper. Retrieved from https://doi.org/productivity.govt.nz/inquiry-con tent/2683?stage=2

    Google Scholar 

  • Parton, N. (1994). The nature of social work under conditions of (post) modernity. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 52(2), 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, K. (2009a). Assessing affective attributes at all levels of higher education. In L. Meyer, S. Davidson, H. Anderson, R. Fletcher, P. Johnson, & M. Rees (Eds.), Tertiary Assessment and Higher Education Student Outcomes: Policy, Practice and Research (pp. 143–152). Ako Aotearoa National Centre for Tertiary Teaching Excellence: Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, K. (2009b). e is for exploration: Assessing hard-to-measure learning outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 386–398. doi:10.1111/j.l467-8535.2008.00927.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoecker, R., Beckman, M., & Min, B. H. (2010). Evaluating the community impact of higher education civic engagement. Handbook of Engaged Scholarship: Contemporary Landscapes, Future Directions, 2, 177–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Otago. (2013). University of Otago Strategic Directions to 2020. Dunedin. (27 June 2016) Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.Otago.ac.nz/Otago053226.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Otago: University of Otago Bulletin Board (2014). Uni News: Community service figures remain strong. (30 August 2016) Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.Otago.ac.nz/Otagobul letin/news/Otago069893.html

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Higher Education Development Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

    Kerry Shephard, Kim Brown, Tess Guiney & Lynley Deaker

Authors
  1. Kerry Shephard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kim Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tess Guiney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lynley Deaker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerry Shephard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shephard, K., Brown, K., Guiney, T. et al. Valuing and evaluating community-engaged scholarship. Tert Educ Manag 24, 83–94 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1395904

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1395904

Keywords

Search

Navigation