Abstract
This paper aims to analyse and discuss the professional support staff at higher education institutions in Sweden in terms of how they view their roles and what the success factors for them are. The study is based on semi-structured interviews with support staff from the fields of business liaison, internationalisation and strategic research support. The results show that the participants have shaped their own roles and see themselves as back-office staff. This can make it challenging for them to prove their contribution to the academic activities of education and research. Because they neither identify themselves as administrators nor hold academic positions, their ability to build credibility on a personal basis is a central success factor. Aware of being actors in a culture dominated by academic values and norms, they see a more transparent discussion of their roles as a desirable development in the sector.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
Benner, M., & Sörlin, S. (2015). Samverkansuppgiften i ett historiskt och institutionellt perspektiv (Report No. 2015:02). VINNOVA Analys: Lund: Lunds universitet.
Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in Higher Education. New York, NY: Pergamon.
Collinson, J. A. (2006). Just ‘non-academics’? Research administrators and contested occupational identity. Work, Employment and Society, 20, 267–288.
Drazin, R., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 514–539.
Gornitzka, Å., & Larsen, I. M. (2004). Towards professionalisation? Restructuring of administrative work force in universities. Higher Education, 47, 455–471.
Gouldner, A. W. (1957). Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles. I.. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 281–306.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 929–964.
Higher Education Act (1992). SFS 1992:1434. Stockholm: Ministry of Education.
Higher Education Ordinance, SFS 2010:543. Stockholm: Ministry of Education.
Karlsson, S., & Ryttberg, M. (2016). Those who walk the talk: The role of administrative professionals in transforming universities into strategic actors. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2016(2–3), 1–8.
Kennedy, D. (1997). Academic duty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Krücken, G., & Meier, F. (2006). Turning the university into an organizational actor. In G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, & Hwang (Eds.), Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change (pp. 241–257). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kvale, S., & Brinkman, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative interviewing. London: Sage.
Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the third mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities? Higher Education Policy, 20, 441–456. doi:10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300169
Musselin, C. (2007). The transformation of academic work: Facts and analysis. UC Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/escholarship.org/uc/item/5c10883g
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179.
Olsen, J. P. (2007). University dynamics and European integration (pp. 25–54). Dordrecht: Springer.
Öquist, G., & Benner, M. (2012). Fostering breakthrough research. Lund: Lunds universitet: The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., & Hughes, A. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university—industry relations. Research Policy, 42, 423–442.
Rhoades, G. (2009). Envisioning invisible workforces: Enhancing intellectual capital. In G. Gordon, & C. Whitchurch (Eds.), Academic and professional identities in higher education: The challenges of a diversifying workforce (pp. 35–53). London: Routledge.
Rhoades, G., & Sporn, B. (2002). New models of management and shifting modes and costs of production: Europe and the United States. Tertiary Education & Management, 8, 3–28.
Sahlin, K., & Eriksson-Zetterquist, U. (2016). Collegiality in modern universities-the composition of governance ideals and practices. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2016(2–3), 1–10.
Schneijderberg, C., & Merkator, N. (2013). The academic profession in Europe: New tasks and new challenges (pp. 53–92). Dordrecht: Springer.
Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 284–297.
Teichler, U. (2012). International student mobility in Europe in the context of the Bologna process. Journal of International Education and Leadership, 2(1), spring 2012, 1–13.
Universitetskanslersämbetet. (2017). Forskningsfinansieringen vid svenska universitet och högsko-lor Intäkter till forskning och utbildning på forskarnivå 2005–2015. Stockholm: Author.
Weber, M. (1983). Ekonomi och Samhälle Förståendesociologins grunder Sociologiska begrepp och definitioner (A. Lundqvist, Trans. Vol. v.1). Grahns Boktryckeri. Lund: Argos.
Whitchurch, C. (2006). Who do they think they are? The changing identities of professional administrators and managers in UK higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28, 159–171.
Whitchurch, C. (2007). The changing roles and identities of professional managers in UK higher education. Perspectives, 11, 53–60.
Whitchurch, C. (2008). Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: The emergence of third space professionals in UK higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 62, 377–396.
Whitchurch, C. (2009). The rise of the blended professional in higher education: A comparison between the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States. Higher Education, 58, 407–418.
Whitchurch, C. (2010). Some implications of ‘public/private’space for professional identities in higher education. Higher Education, 60, 627–640.
Whitchurch, C. (2012). Reconstructing Identities in higher education: The rise of ‘third space’ professionals. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
About this article
Cite this article
Ryttberg, M., Geschwind, L. Professional support staff at higher education institutions in Sweden: roles and success factors for the job. Tert Educ Manag 23, 334–346 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1322631
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1322631