Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The organizational identity of Ukrainian universities as claimed through their mission statements

  • Article
  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After the Revolution of Dignity (2014), Ukraine signed an Association Agreement with the European Union. In the context of European integration, new legislation on higher education has been adopted. Changes in the institutional environment expect responses from higher education institutions, in particular changes in the organizational identities of Ukrainian universities that are claimed through the mission statements. As Ukrainian universities are in the stage of transition from the Soviet past to the European future, it is of primary importance how they interpret and respond to the changes in the institutional environment, claiming their organizational identity through mission statements. To answer this question, sociological institutionalism is applied as a theoretical framework for the exploration of how institutions shape the organizational identities of universities. A content analysis of the mission statements of 46 Ukrainian universities was conducted: 26 defined before the adoption of the new legislation on higher education in 2014 and 20 formulated after this date.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Accounting Chamber of Ukraine. (2015). Decision on the results of the analysis of formation, allocation and implementation of the state order for the training of students at the higher education institutions. Retrieved from https://doi.org/osvita.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/20150811_ No_1_5.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, S., & Whetten, D. (1985). Organizational identity. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (pp. 263–295). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behm, B., Berthold, Ch., & Daghestani, M. (2011). Stratagische Management an Hochschulen [Strategic management of higher education institutions]. Gutersloh: Arbeitspapier des CHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behm, B., & Bertold, Ch. (2011). Developing strategies for a higher education institution and its faculties/departments. Leadership and Governance in Higher Education, 1, 2–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borisov, I., & Zapryagaev, S. (2001). Complexes of universities and education of universities. University Management, 3(18). Retrieved from https://doi.org/ecsocman.hse.ru/text/17981961/

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. (2008). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin and R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 79–98). London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunina, L. (2013). The history of higher education in Ukraine. Naukovuy Visnuk Donbasu, 3. Retrieved from https://doi.org/nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/nvd_2013_3_2

  • Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2010). On approval of the regulations on research university. Retrieved from https://doi.org/zakon1.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/163-2010-%D0%BF?myid=4%2FUMfPEGznhhm3c.ZiOXhkA6Hdl0QsFggkRbI1c

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S., & Glaister, K. (1996). Spurs to higher things? Mission statements of UK universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 50, 261–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dementyev, V., & Vyshnevskyi, V. (2011). Why is Ukraine not an innovative state: Institutional analysis. Economic Theory, 3, 5–20. Retrieved from https://doi.org/dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/28465

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J., de Boer, H., & Leisyte, L. (2008). On striking the right notes: Shifts in governance and the organizational transformation of universities. In A. Amaral, I. Bleiklie, & Ch. Musselin (Eds.), From governance to identity (pp. 113–129). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Ministry of Education and Research (1999). Hohschulrahmengezetz. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/hrg/gesamt.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. (2002). University Organisation and Studies Act (Universities Act 2002). Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.uibk.ac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumasoli, T., Pinheiro, R., & Stensaker, B. (2014). Strategizing identity in higher education. ISL Working Paper 3. Kristiansand: University of Agder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D., Patvardhan, S., Hamilton, A., & Corley, K. (2013). Organizational identity formation and change. The Academy of Management Annals, 7, 123–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. (2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25, 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D., Price, K., & Hamilton, A. (2010). Forging an identity: An insider-outsider study of processes involved in the formation of organizational identity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, M. A. (2008). Beyond constraint: How institutions enable identities. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sagehandbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 413–430). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, A. (1999). Governmental policies and organizational change in higher education. Higher Education, 38, 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase, R., & Krücken, G. (2013). Competition and actorhood: A further expansion of the neo-institutional agenda. Sociologia Internationalis, 51, 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hladchenko, M. (2013). Mission statement — A component of the strategic management of university (on the example of German universities). New Educational Review, 31, 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hladchenko, M., de Boer, H., & Westerheijden, D. (2016). Establishing research universities in Ukrainian higher education: The incomplete journey of a structural reform. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 38, 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koeble, T. (1995). Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. Comparative Politics, 27, 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosmützky, A. (2010). Von der organisierten Institution zur institutionalisierten Organisation? Eine Untersuchung der (Hochschul-) Leitbilder von Universitäten [From the organized institution to the institutionalized organization. An analysis of mission statements of German universities]. Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosmützky, A. (2012). Between mission and market position: Empirical findings on mission statements of German higher education institutions. Tertiary Education and Management, 18, 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosmützky, A., & Krücken, G. (2015). Sameness and difference: Analyzing institutional and organizational specificities of universities through mission statements. International Studies of Management and Organization, 45, 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. (1992). Strategic management in Western European universities. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maximova-Mentzoni, T. (2013). The changing Russian university: From state to market. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, C. (1995). Constructing the nation-state: International organization and prescriptive action. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. (1999). The changing cultural content of the nation-state: A world society perspective. In G. Steinmetz (Ed.), State/culture: State-formation after the cultural turn (pp. 123–124). Ithaca, NJ: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. (2010). World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, O. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nationstate. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 144–181. doi:10.1086/231174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oleksiyenko, A. (2014). Socio-economic forces and the rise of the world-class research university in the post-Soviet higher education space: The case of Ukraine. European Journal of Higher Education, 4, 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parliament of Ukraine. (1991). Law on entrepreneurship. Retrieved from https://doi.org/zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/698-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliament of Ukraine. (2002). Law on Higher Education. Retrieved from https://doi.org/zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2984-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliament of Ukraine. (2014). Law on Higher Education. Retrieved from https://doi.org/zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ru/1556-18

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W., & DiMaggio, P. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M., & Corley, K. (2007). Managing multiple organizational identities: On identiy ambiguity, identity conflict, and members’ reactions. In C. Bartel, S. Blader, & A. Wrzesniewski (Eds.), Identity and the modern organization (pp. 99–119). New York, NY: Psychology press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, F., & Rubinson, R. (1979). Creating members: The political incorporation and expansion of public education. In J. Meyer & M. Hannan (Eds.), National development and the world system (pp. 72–84). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofer, E., Hironaka, A., & Frank, D. (2012). Sociological institutionalism and world society. In E. Amenta, K. Nash, & A. Scott (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell companion to political sociology (pp. 57–68). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2006). The mission of the university: Medieval to postmodern transformations. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shemena, N. (2013). Ukrainian realities of private education. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.osvita.org.ua/articles/1445.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadnyi, Ye. (2013). The status of the national higher education institutions: Political dimension. Retrieved from https://doi.org/ru.osvita.ua/vnz/33733/

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadnyi, Ye. (2015). Ukrainian students in foreign higher education institutions. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.cedos.org.ua/uk/osvita/kilkist-st

    Google Scholar 

  • State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2016). Higher education institutions. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.ukrstat.gov.ua/

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, D. (1990). From dependency to sovereignty: An event history analysis of decolonization. Annual Sociological Review, 55, 846–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G., Meyer, J., Ramirez, F., & Boli, J. (1987). Institutional structures: Constituting state, society and the individual. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. (2006). Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D., & Mackey, A. (2002). A social actor conception of organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation. Business & Society, 41, 393–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zechlin, L. (2007). Strategische Hochschulentwicklung [Strategic development of higher education institution]. Die Hochschule, 1, 115–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zomer, A., & Benneworth, P. (2011). The rise of the university’s third mission. In J. Enders, H. de Boer, & D. Westerheijden (Eds.), Reform of higher education in Europe (pp. 81–101). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Mission statements of universities which were explored

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Humanities and Pedagogy, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

    Myroslava Hladchenko

Authors
  1. Myroslava Hladchenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myroslava Hladchenko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hladchenko, M. The organizational identity of Ukrainian universities as claimed through their mission statements. Tert Educ Manag 22, 376–389 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2016.1236144

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2016.1236144

Keywords

Search

Navigation