Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Responding to regulatory jolts in the English higher education sector

  • Article
  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Throughout the world universities are having to face constantly changing environments. A particular type of important change is public policy reforms or regulatory jolts. The English higher education sector is an example of the latter, where constant regulatory jolts have been seen in past decades. Leaders at universities have needed to interpret these environmental changes and decide how to cope with them. In this paper, the case of the post-Browne Review reforms in England’s higher education sector is used in order to explore how senior leaders in universities make sense of regulatory jolts. Based on primary qualitative research, which involved 47 semistructured interviews with senior university leaders in England, including 24 vicechancellors, I explore how senior leaders in universities interpreted, or made sense of, the post-Browne Review regulatory jolt. The paper suggests that senior university leaders’ interpretations might be deeply intertwined with their identity interpretations of who they are throughout these periods of turbulence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balogun, J., & Floyd, S. W. (2010). Breaking out of strategy vectors: Reintroducing culture. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 18, 51–76. doi:10.1108/s0897-3016(2010)0000018006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. (2004). Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 523–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. (1992). Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 15–36. doi:10.1002/smj.4250131004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartunek, J. M. (1984). Changing interpretative schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 355–372. doi:10.2307/2393029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowe, R., Ball, S. J., & Gold, A. (1992). Reforming education & changing schools. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Business Review, 73, 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. (2013). What organization theorists and public policy researchers can learn from one another: Publicness theory as a case-in-point. Organization Studies, 34, 169–188. doi:10.1177/0170840612473549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Bekhradnia, B. (2013). The future regulation of higher education in England. London: HEPI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, J. (2010). Securing a sustainable future for higher education: An independent review of higher education funding & student finance. London: Independent Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. (1983). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 223–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callender, C., & Scott, P. (2013). Introduction. In C. S. Callender (Ed.), Browne and beyond: Modernizing English higher education (pp. 1–14). London: IOE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, E. E. (1985). Three models of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 10, 89–98. doi:10.5465/AMR.1985.4277354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarthy, B. S., & Doz, Y. (1992). Strategy process research: Focusing on corporate selfrenewal. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 5–14. doi:10.1002/smj.4250131003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E., & Geppert, M. (2011). Subsidiary integration as identity construction and institution building: A political sensemaking approach. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 395–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, D., & Tourish, D. (2015). Teaching leadership critically: New directions for leadership pedagogy. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14, 576–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collis, D. J., & Rukstad, M. G. (2008). Can you say what your strategy is? Harvard Business Review, 86, 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 173–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9, 284–295. doi:10.2307/258441

    Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. (2011). Trying to become a different type of company: Dynamic capability at Smith Corona. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1–31. doi:10.1002/smj.863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wit, K. (2010). The networked university: The structure, culture, and policy of universities in a changing environment. Tertiary Education and Management, 16(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/13583880903335464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deLeon, P., & deLeon, L. (2002). What ever happened to policy implementation? An alternative approach. Journal ofPublic Administration Research and Theory, 12, 467–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis, J. L., Lamothe, L., & Langley, A. (2001). The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 809–837. doi:10.2307/3069417

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Business, Information and Skills. (2011a). Students at the heart of the system. London: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Business, Information and Skills. (2011b). The government’s response to Lord Browne’s review. London: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, J. P., & Kaplan, S. (2013). Cognition and capabilities: A multi-level perspective. The Academy of Management Annals, 7, 295–340. doi:10.1080/19416520.2013.769318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 17–37. doi:10.1002/smj.4250130904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J., de Boer, H., & Weyer, E. (2013). Regulatory autonomy and performance: The reform of higher education re-visited. Higher Education, 65, 5–23. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9578-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engau, C., Hoffmann, V. H., & Busch, T. (2011). Airlines’ flexibility in facing regulatory uncertainty: To anticipate or adapt? California Management Review, 54, 107–125. doi:10.1525/ cmr.2011.54.1.107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313–330. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00069-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.), 645–672. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 433–448. doi:10.1002/smj.4250120604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M., & Chittipeddi, K. (1994). Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamics of sensemaking and influence. Organization Science, 5, 363–383. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.3.363

    Google Scholar 

  • Grint, K. (2005). Problems, problems, problems: The social construction of ‘leadership’. Human Relations, 58, 1467–1494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32, 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflecton of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206. doi:10.2307/258434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2000). The major policy changes. In Academic identities and policy change in higher education (pp. 29–48). London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, N. (2014). Unfinished business? Higher education legislation. London: HEPI.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury. (2010). Spending review 2010. London: HM Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G., & Sparrow, P. R. (2002). The competent organization. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., James, O., & Scott, C. (2000). Regulation of government: Has it increased, is it increasing, should it be diminished? Public Administration, 78, 283–304. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. (1988). Rethinking incrementalism. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. (1992). Managing strategic change — Strategy, culture and action. Long Range Planning, 25, 28–36. doi:10.1016/0024-6301(92)90307-N

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanji, S., & Cahusac, E. (2015). Who am I? Mothers’ shifting identities, loss and sensemaking after workplace exit. 68, 1415–1436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. (2011). Research in cognition and strategy: Reflections on two decades of progress and a look to the future. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 665–695. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00983.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koberg, C., Chesley, J. A., & Heppard, K. A. (2000). Adaptive latitude: Environment, organization, and individual influences. Journal of Business Research, 50, 259–272. doi:10.1016/ s0148-2963(99)00020-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laamanen, T., & Wallin, J. (2009). Cognitive dynamics of capability development paths. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 950–981. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00823.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A., & Abdallah, C. (2016). Templates and turns in qualitative studies of strategy and management. In G. Dagnino & M. Cinici (Eds.), Research methods for strategic management (pp. 137–166). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabey, C. (2013). Leadership development in organizations: Multiple discourses and diverse practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 359–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, J. F., & Murray, E. A. (1981). Strategic-planning for regulated companies. Strategic Management Journal, 2, 251–262. doi:10.1002/smj.4250020304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 21–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2013). Sensemaking in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 8, 57–125. doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.873177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitlis, S., & Sonenshein, S. (2010). Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick (1988). Journal of Management Studies, 47, 551–580. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00908.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2013). The impossibility of capitalist markets in higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 353–370. doi:10.1080/02680939.2012.747109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, A. M., Fitzgerald, L., & Buchanan, D. A. (2013). Beyond acceptance and resistance: Entrepreneurial change agency responses in policy implementation. British Journal of Management, 24, S93-S115. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12012

  • Meyer, A. D. (1982). Adapting to environmental jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 515–537. doi:10.2307/2392528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24, 934–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. A. (1985). Of Strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2012). HE bill is needed, says Willetts, but ‘who knows’ when it will appear. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/he-bill-is-needed-says-willetts- but-who-knows-when-it-will-appear/420496.article

    Google Scholar 

  • Noda, T., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Strategy making as iterated processes of resource allocation. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 159–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocasio, W. (2011). Attention to attention. Organization Science, 22, 1286–1296. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C., & Holzinger, I. (2008). The effectiveness of strategic political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. Academy of Management Review, 33, 496–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., & Baden-Fuller, C. (1989). Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies, 26, 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (2006). The mission of the university: Medieval to postmodern transformations. Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 1–39. doi:10.1353/jhe.2006.0007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. (2013). The coalition government’s reform of higher education: Policy formation and political process. In C. Callender & P. Scott (Eds.), Browne review and beyond: Modernizing English higher education (1st ed., pp. 32–56). London: IOE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, B. (1995). Firm-level responses to government regulation: Theoretical and research approaches. Journal of Management, 21, 495–514. doi:10.1016/0149-2063(95)90017-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2000). Strategic management in European universities in an age of increasing institutional self reliance. Tertiary Education and Management, 6, 93–104. doi:10.1080/ 13583883.2000.9967015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2003). Managing successful universities. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2013). Public expenditure and tuition fees: The search for alternative ways to pay for higher education. In C. Callender & P. Scott (Eds.), Browne and beyond: Modernizing English higher education (pp. 15–31). London: IOE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smerek, R. (2013). Sensemaking and new college presidents: A conceptual study of the transition process. The Review of Higher Education, 36, 371–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. L., & Mick, S. S. (1985). A theory of organizational response to hospital regulation: A reply. Academy of Management Review, 10, 332–336. doi:10.2307/257974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sporn, B. (1995). Adaptation processes at universities: Organizational implications of a complex environment. Tertiary Education and Management, 1, 72–75. doi:10.1080/13583883.1995.9966859

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C., & McCaig, C. (2014). Evaluating the impact of number controls, choice and competition: An analysis of the student profile and the student learning environment in the new higher education landscape. York: HEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J., & Bekhradnia, B. (2011). Higher education: Students at the heart of the system — An analysis of the higher education white paper. Summary. London: HEPI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1147–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip to down memory lane. Organization Science, 6, 280–321. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.3.280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (2013). Leading the British university today: Your fate in whose hands? In C. Callender & P. Scott (Eds.), Browne and beyond: Modernizing English higher education (pp. 194–205). London: IOE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (2014). Robbins and his children: The theory and practice of higher education inquiries, 1963–2013. Higher Education Quarterly, 68, 125–146. doi:10.1111/hequ.12045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409–421. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyness, G. (2013). As easy as AAB: The impact of the quasi-market on institutions, student numbers and the higher education sector. In C. Callender & P. Scott (Eds.), Browne and beyond: Modernizing English higher education (1st ed., pp. 89–111). London: IOE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoffie, D. B., & Kwak, M. (2001). Playing by the rules: How Intel avoids antitrust litigation. Harvard Business Review, 79, 119–122.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bath, UK

    Gerardo Abreu Pederzini

Authors
  1. Gerardo Abreu Pederzini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerardo Abreu Pederzini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pederzini, G.A. Responding to regulatory jolts in the English higher education sector. Tert Educ Manag 22, 316–332 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2016.1233452

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2016.1233452

Keywords

Search

Navigation