Skip to main content
Log in

Campus-based tensions in the structural development of a newly merged university: the case of the University of Eastern Finland

  • Article
  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the campus-based tensions which are emerging in the multi-campus university during a critical period of structural development. A multi-campus system easily generates intrinsic tensions between ‘localist’ campus-based interests and system-level interests, in which the interests of external stakeholders often play a central role. These campus-based tensions are empirically explored through two illustrative examples involving the University of Eastern Finland, which is a multi-campus university established through the merger of two universities in 2010. The key theoretical idea of the analysis derives from a multi-scalar framework, in which the actors and processes of structural development are analyzed across multiple geographical scales. The findings of the case studies are divided into four types, addressing the competitive spatial horizons of the main university actors and stakeholders. From a management perspective, structural development in a multi-campus university is seen as a difficult balancing act between campus-based and system-wide interests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addie, J.-P., Keil, R., & Olds, K. (2015). Beyond town and gown: Universities, territoriality and the mobilization of new urban structures in Canada. Territory, Politics, Governance, 3, 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlqvist, T., & Moisio, S. (2014). Neoliberalisation in a Nordic state: From cartel policy towards a corporate polity in Finland. New Political Economy, 19, 21–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. (2003). Methodology for close up studies — Struggling with closeness and closure. Higher Education, 46, 167–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannick, T., & Coghlan, D. (2007). In defense of being “native”: The case for insider academic research. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Y., Pinheiro, R., Geschwind, L., & Aarrevaara, T. (2016). Towards a novel conceptual framework for understanding mergers in higher education. European Journal of Higher Education, 6, 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, D., Kitagawa, F., & Uyarra, E. (2014). Universities in crisis? New challenges and strategies in two English city-regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7, 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, K. R. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, J., Coombes, M., Kempton, L., & Vallance, P. (2014). Universities as anchor institutions in cities in a turbulent funding environment: Vulnerable institutions and vulnerable places in England. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7, 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, K. (2002). Merging divergent campus cultures into coherent educational communities: Challenges for higher education leaders. Higher Education, 44, 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. (2013). Configuring the new ‘regional world’: On being caught between territory and networks. Regional Studies, 47, 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J., Smith, D. P., & Kinton, C. (2016). New institutional geographies of higher education: The rise of transregional university alliances. Environment and Planning A, 48, 910–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. M., Nokkala, T., & Välimaa, J. (2016). World class local heroes: Emerging competitive horizons and transnational academic capitalism in Finnish higher education - 2010–2012. In D. M. Hoffman & J. Välimaa (Eds.), Re-becoming universities? Higher education institutions in networked knowledge societies (pp. 247–282). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, U., & Olsson, J. (2013). Vägval för Mittuniversitetet - regionala konsekvenser av verk-samhetsförändringar i Härnösand [Choice of path for mid Sweden university - The regional effects of business changes in Härnösand]. Stockholm: Sweco Eurofutures AB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jons, H., & Hoyler, M. (2013). Global geographies of higher education: The perspective of world university rankings. Geoforum, 46, 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosmützky, A., & Ewen, E. (2016). Global, national and local? The multilayered spatial ties of universities to society. In D. M. Hoffman & J. Välimaa (Eds.), Re-becoming universities? Higher education institutions in networked knowledge societies (pp. 223–245). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton Smith, H., & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2012). The research university, entrepreneurship and regional development: Research propositions and current evidence. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24, 383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. (2011). Reconstructing scale: Towards a new scalar politics. Progress in Human Geography, 35, 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43, 281–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, M., & Schaefer, S. (2001). Autonomy and anonymity: Characteristics of branch campus faculty. Metropolitan Universities, 12, 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paasi, A. (2013). Regional planning and the mobilization of ‘regional identity’: From bounded spaces to relational complexity. Regional Studies, 47, 1206–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B., & May, T. (2006). Excellence, relevance and the university: The “missing middle” in socio-economic engagement. JHEA/RESA, 4, 69–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R. (2012). University ambiguity and institutionalization: A tale of three regions. In R. Pinheiro, P. Benneworth, & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development. A critical assessment of fensions and contradictions (pp. 35–55). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R. (2015). Citius, altius, fortius: Mobilising the University for the “Europe of knowledge”. In F. M. Ribeiro, Y. Politis, & B. Culum (Eds.), New voices in higher education research and scholarship (pp. 1–17). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, R., Benneworth, P., & Jones, G. A. (2012). Understanding regions and the institutionalization of universities. In R. Pinheiro, P. Benneworth, & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development. A critical assessment of tensions and contradictions (pp. 11–32). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Power, D., & Malmberg, A. (2008). The contribution of universities to innovation and economic development: In what sense a regional problem? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1, 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prime Minister’s Office. (2015). Finland, a land of solutions. Strategic Programme of Prime Minister Juha Sipilä’s Government 29 May 2015. Helsinki: Government Publications 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinne, R. (2004). Searching for the rainbow: Changing the course of Finnish higher education. In I. Fägerlind & G. Strönmqvist (Eds.), Reforming higher education in the Nordic countries — Studies of change in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden (pp. 89–135). Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B., Persson, M., & Pinheiro, R. (2016). When mergers fail: A case study on the critical role of external stakeholders in merger initiatives. European Journal of Higher Education, 6, 56–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (2004). Globalisation or ‘glocalisation’? Networks, territories and rescaling. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17, 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirronen, J. (2008). Itä-Suomen yliopistohankkeen prosessiarviointi I [Process evaluation of the University of Eastern Finland - Project, part I]. Kuopio: Kuopion yliopisto & Joensuun yliopisto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirronen, J. (2011). Itä-Suomen yliopistohankkeen prosessiarviointi, Osat II ja III [Process evaluation of the University of Eastern Finland - Project, parts II and III]. Joensuu: Publications of the University of Eastern Finland, General Series 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirronen, J., Aula, H.-M., & Aarrevaara, T. (2016). A complex and messy merger: The road to University of Eastern Finland. In R. Pinheiro, L. Geschwind, & L. Aarrevaara (Eds.), Mergers in higher education. The experience from Northern Europe (pp. 179–193). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tirronen, J., & Nokkala, T (2009). Structural development of Finnish universities: Achieving competitiveness and academic excellence. Higher Education Quarterly, 63, 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uyarra, E. (2010). Conceptualizing the regional roles of universities, implications and contradictions. European Planning Studies, 18, 1227–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Välimaa, J., Aittola, H., & Ursin, J. (2014). University mergers in Finland: Mediating global competition. New Directions for Higher Education. Critical Perspectives on Global Competition in Higher Education, 168, 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Välimaa, J., & Hoffman, D. (2007). The future of Finnish higher education challenged by global competitive horizon. In S. Marginson (Ed.), Prospects of higher education: Globalization, market competition, public goods and the future of the university (pp. 185–200). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vartiainen, P. (2016). Suomalaisen korkeakouluverkon kehittämisen vaihtoehdoist [Higher education network development options in Finland], Tieteessä Tapahtuu, 3, 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vartiainen, P., & Viiri, A. (2015). Universities and their local partners. The case of the University of Joensuu, Finland. In J. Mitra & J. Edmondson (Eds.), Entrepreneur ship and knowledge exchange (pp. 355–366). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winchester, H. P. M., & Sterk, B. F. (2006). Multi-campus university management: Lessons from AUQA audit reports. Proceedings of the Australian Universities Quality Forum 2006. AUQA Occasional Publication.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Perttu Vartiainen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vartiainen, P. Campus-based tensions in the structural development of a newly merged university: the case of the University of Eastern Finland. Tert Educ Manag 23, 53–68 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2016.1205123

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2016.1205123

Keywords

Navigation