Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preparing higher education students for the new landscape of governance

  • Article
  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies have demonstrated that neoliberal governance dismantles professionals’ will to critique, counteracting efforts to improve quality by preventing professionals in all sectors of the labour market from grounding work in their professional convictions. Managing attempts at governance has therefore become an important professional competence. This paper investigates how higher education prepares students for work under neoliberal forms of control. How are they trained to analyse and describe the effects of governance and prepared to work with the standards, manuals and documentation that influence quality in their lines of work? ‘Interruptive focus group conversations’ were performed with students from various professional programmes at a Swedish university. Student reasoning about governance is explored using theories of governance and subjectification. The results demonstrate that students are aware of the ways in which their professions are governed, the need to conduct discretionary work, but do not have skills to deal with governance critically. This latitude for pedagogical intervention is underutilized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Agevall, L., & Jonnergård, K. (2007). Management by documents: A risk for de-professionalizing? In C. Aili & L.-E. Nilsson (Eds.), The individual in tension between organization and profession (pp. 33–55). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aili, C., & Nilsson, L.-E. (2015). Dual learning - A challenge for higher education in the new landscape of governance. Tertiary Education and Management, 21, 277–292. doi:10.1080/13583883.2015.1068367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, M. G. (2006). Bachelor of what, master of whom? The Humboldt myth and historical transformations of higher education in German-speaking Europe and the US. European Journal of Education, 41, 245–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, D. (1997). A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J., & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54, 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1999). Learning to work and working to learn. In D. Boud & J. Garrick (Eds.), Understanding learning at work (pp. 29–43). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S., Geer, B., Hughes, E. C., & Strauss, A. L. (1961). Boys in white: Student culture in medical school. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bildtgård, T. (2002). Hur maten blev en risk: Medicinens bidrag till regleringen av det svenska ätandet [How food became a risk: Medicine and the regulation of Swedish eating]. Uppsala: Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. (2009). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burrage, M., & Torstendahl, R. (1990). Professions in theory and history. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L., Orrell, J., & Bowden, M. (2010). Work integrated learning: A guide to effective practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J., & Bansel, P. (2010). Governmentality and academic work: shaping the hearts and minds of academic workers. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 26, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evetts, J. (2009). New professionalism and new public management: changes, continuities and consequences. Comparative Sociology, 8, 247–266. doi:10.1163/156913309X421655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evetts, J. (2013). Professionalism: Value and ideology. Current Sociology, 61, 778–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsell, A., & Westerberg, A. I. (2014). Adminstrationssamhället [Administration society]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8, 777–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990). The care of the self. The history of sexuality. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2000). Governmentality. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Power: subjectivity and truth: The essential works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984 (pp. 201–222). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism, the third logic: On the practice of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, E. H., & Sandefur, R. L. (2011). ‘Golden age’, quiescence, and revival: How the sociology of professions became the study of knowledge-based work. Work and Occupations, 38, 275–302. doi:10.1177/0730888411417565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guile, D., & Griffiths, T. (2001). Learning through work experience. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. (2005). Embedding and integrating employability. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2005, 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselberg, Y. (2013). In defence of discretion. In S. Rider, Y. Hasselberg, & A. Waluszewski (Eds.), Transformations in research, higher education and the academic market (pp. 137–144). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28, 16–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, S.-Å. (1993). Den hotfulla njutningen: Att etablera drogbruk som ett samhällsproblem 1890–1970 [The menacing pleasure. Establishing drug use as a social problem 1890 to 1970. Stockholm: Symposium Graduale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2013). The impact of research on education policy in an era of evidence-based policy. Critical Studies in Education, 54, 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marková, I., Linell, P., Grossen, M., & Salazar Orvig, A. (2007). Dialogue in focus groups: Exploring socially shared knowledge. London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1939). The professions and social structure. Social Forces, 17, 457–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • SFS (1992:1434). Högskolelagen [Higher Education Act]. Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • SFS (1993:100). Högskoleförordningen [Higher Education Ordinance]. Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (2000). The tyranny of transparency. British Educational Research Journal, 26, 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars-Erik Nilsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aili, C., Nilsson, LE. Preparing higher education students for the new landscape of governance. Tert Educ Manag 22, 249–265 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2016.1196725

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2016.1196725

Keywords

Navigation