Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Governance of higher education — the role of proximity in teaching quality

  • Article
  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The starting point of this article is the relation between teaching quality and expectations by different governance actors in higher education. Managing a department in a public university is, to a large extent, about the coordination of governance actors, involving government authorities as well as the university and the faculty. Internally, the departmental management has to act strategically to achieve this coordination, especially in relation to teachers who expect resource allocation to ensure teaching quality, expressed in terms of academic requirements. To explore this, the concept of proximity is introduced. The study points out the importance of organizing teaching activities to create proximity, as well as that the context and conditions for creating proximity are important for teaching quality, thus achieving coordination with governance actors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boschma, R. A. (2005, February). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M., Hirschberg, J., Lye, J., & Johnston, C. (2010). A systematic analysis of quality of teaching surveys. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. H., Schoorman, D. F., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, S. C., & Buckle, J. L. (2009). The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8, 54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluvers, R., & Tippett, J. (2011). An exploration of stewardship theory in a not-for-profit organization. Accounting Forum, 35, 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. A. G. (2006). Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8, 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leten, B., Landoni, P., & Van Looy, B. (2014). Science or graduates: How do firms benefit from the proximity of universities? Research Policy, 43, 1398–1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, K.-J., & Trippl, M. (2013). Distance, proximity and types of cross-border innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. Regional Studies, 4, 440–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macey, J. R., & Boot Arnoud, W. A. (2004). Monitoring, corporate performance: The role of objectivity, proximity and adaptability in corporate governance. Yale Law School, Faculty Scholarship Series, Paper 1420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plecki, Margaret L., Alejano, C. R., Knapp, M. S., & Lochmiller, C. R. (2006). Allocating resources and creating incentives to improve teaching and learning. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearmur, R. (2010). Space, place and innovation: A distance-based approach. The Canadian Geographer, 54, 46–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simões, C., & Soares, A. M. (2010). Applying to higher education: Information sources and choice factors. Studies in Higher Education, 335, 371–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar, K., Li, M., & Dong, B. (2014). Service quality: The impact of frequency, timing, proximity, and sequence of failures and delights. Journal of Marketing, 78, 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swedish Higher Education Authority. (2014). Higher education in Sweden. 2014 status report. Stockholm: Swedish Higher Education Authority Report, 2014, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torre, A. (2008). On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission. Regional Studies, 42, 869–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39, 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, S. (1997). Corporate governance: Its scope, concerns and theories. Corporate Governance, 5(4), 180–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • https://doi.org/www.lu.se.. 16 April 2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikos Macheridis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Macheridis, N., Paulsson, A. Governance of higher education — the role of proximity in teaching quality. Tert Educ Manag 22, 202–217 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2016.1183036

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2016.1183036

Keywords

Navigation