Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Monitoring Trends in Student Satisfaction

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last decade, the assessment of student experience has gained significant prominence in Australian higher education. Universities conduct internal surveys in order to identify which of their services students rate higher or lower on importance and performance. Thus, institutions can promote highly performing areas and work on those needing improvement, while students are given an opportunity to influence decision-making in both academic and non-academic spheres of campus life. National student surveys conducted by the government aim to maintain quality assurance in the sector, benchmark outcomes, and, in some cases, reward better performing institutions. This paper outlines the findings of a study which monitored the entire student experience in a large metropolitan multi-campus university during 2005–2011. A specially designed biennial survey was repeated across the years, and completed over the period by 10,562 students from all key cohorts. This paper discusses the trends in perceived importance and performance of various university services and key issues the university has been addressing in order to enhance student experience. It concludes that: (a) the time series data provide a powerful lens into the university’s strategies, initiatives and actions which worked well and those needing further effort or adjustment; (b) it is the total experience of the university that shapes students’ judgements, not just what happens in the classroom; and (c) taking a systematic approach to student feedback, and acting on the results in a timely manner, can significantly improve student engagement and satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2007). Conceptual model of student satisfaction in higher education. Total Quality Management, 18, 571–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. W., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993). The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Science, 12, 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. (2001). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Council for Educational Research. (2008). Australasian student engagement report: Australasian survey of student engagement. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.acer.edu.au/research/ ausse/reports

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Council for Educational Research. (2010). Student engagement in New Zealand’s universities. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.acer.edu.au/research/ausse/reports

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery, R. J., Bryan, W. K., Mathios, A., Kang, H., & Bell, D. (2006). Electronic course evaluations: Does an online delivery system influence student evaluations? Journal of Economic Education, 37, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, T., & Blattner, N. (2003). Guarding against potential bias in student evaluations: What every faculty member needs to know. College Teaching, 51, 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrie, S., Ginns, P., & Symons, R. (2008). Student surveys on teaching and learning. Sydney: Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L., & Nair, C. S. (2010). A recipe for effective participation rates for web-based surveys. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 357–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R. N. (1998). A dynamic model of the duration of the customer’s relationship with a continuous service provider: The role of satisfaction. Marketing Science, 17, 45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Academy. (2012). Measuring success—league tables in the public sector. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.britac.ac.uk/policy/Measuring-success.cfm

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (1979). Determining faculty effectiveness: Assessing teaching, research and service for personnel decisions and improvement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, K., & Ward, J. (1987). Determinants of consumer satisfaction with education: Implications for college and university administrators. College and University, 62, 236–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education: University connections. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, C. (2002). Variability of student ratings of accounting teaching: Evidence from a Scottish business school. International Journal of Management Education, 2, 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Final report. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Review/Documents/PDF/Higher%20Education20Review_one%20document_02.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2009). Transforming Australia’s higher education system. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Documents/TransformingAusHigherED.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2009). Higher ambitions: The future of universities in a knowledge economy. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.bis.gov.uk/policies/higher-ambitions

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Collier Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. D. (2007). Will market competition assure academic quality? An analysis of the UK and US experience. In D. F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker, & M. J. Rosa (Eds.), Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation (pp. 47–72). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, W. R., Madden, T. J., & Firtle, N. H. (1993). Essentials of marketing research. Boston, MA: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolinsky, A. (1994). A consumer complaint framework with resulting strategies: An application to higher education. Journal of Services Marketing, 8, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dommeyer, C. J., Baum, P., Hanna, R. W., & Chapman, K. S. (2004). Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in-class and online surveys: Their effects on response rates and evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 611–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J., Douglas, A., & Barnes, B. (2006). Measuring student satisfaction at a UK university. Quality Assurance in Education, 14, 251–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furedi, F. (2012, March 8). Satisfaction and its discontents. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=419238

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmid, M. L. (1978). The evaluation and improvement of teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 7, 221–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grebennikov, L., & Shah, M. (2012). Commencing student experience: New insights and implications for action. European Journal of Higher Education, 2, 267–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grebennikov, L., & Shah, M. (2013). Student voice: Using qualitative feedback from students to enhance their university experience. Teaching in Higher Education, Advance online publication. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13562517.2013.774353

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, T., Fuß, S., Voss, R., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2010). Examining student satisfaction with higher education services: Using a new measurement tool. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23, 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. (1995). Student satisfaction. The New Review of Academic Librarianship, 1, 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. (2003). Student feedback. Quality in Higher Education, 9, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L., Plimmer, L., Moon, S., & Geall, V. (1997). Student satisfaction manual. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, D. L., Baldwin, G., & McInnis, C. (1999). Which university? The factors influencing the choices of prospective undergraduates. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, D., Williams, J., & Cappuccini-Ansfield, G. (2008). Student satisfaction surveys: The value in taking an historical perspective. Quality in Higher Education, 14, 135–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Fox, K. F. A. (1995). Strategic marketing for educational institutions (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, K.-L., Hartley, R., James, R., & McInnis, C. (2005). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from a decade of national studies. CSHE, University of Melbourne. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/pdfs/FYEReport05KLK.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Leckey, J., & Neill, N. (2001). Quantifying quality: The importance of student feedback. Quality in Higher Education, 7, 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, G. A. (2012). The sacred in the modern world: A cultural sociological approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machell, J., & Saunders, M. (2007). An exploratory evaluation of the use of the National Student Survey (NSS) results dissemination website. York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41, 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, W. J., & Lin, W. G. (1975). Multiple discriminant analysis of student ratings of college teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 68, 300–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, C. S., & Shah, M. (2012). Quality of the student experience: An international study. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education, 2, 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Survey of Sudent Engagement. (2007). About NSSE. Retrieved from https://doi.org/nsse.iub.edu/html/about.cfm

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, B. M., & Baron, S. (2000). Student perceptions of service quality in a UK university business and management faculty. Quality Assurance in Education, 8, 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T. (2001). Identifying excellence in undergraduate education: Are we even close? Change, 33, 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petruzzellis, P., D’ Uggento, M. A., & Romanazzi, S. (2006). Student satisfaction and quality of service in Italian universities. Managing Service Quality, 16, 349–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S. R. (Ed.). (2004). Overcoming survey research problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powney, J., & Hall, S. (1998). Closing the loop: The impact of student feedback on students’ subsequent learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, I., Matzdorf, F., Smith, L., & Agahi, H. (2003). The impact of facilities on student choice of university. Facilities, 21, 212–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, H. E. (1976). Attitudes of college and university faculty toward the use of student evaluations. Educational Research Quarterly, 1, 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A review of the literature. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 387–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, J. (1997). Beyond service quality dimensions in higher education and towards a service contract. Quality Assurance in Education, 5, 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, J. (2003). Designing student feedback questionnaires. Quality Assurance in Education, 11, 142–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabri, D. (2011). What’s wrong with ‘the student experience’? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32, 657–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Select Committee for Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills. (2009). Students and universities, eleventh report of session 2008–2009, volume 1. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmdius/170/170i.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, M., & Nair, C. S. (2009). Using student voice to improve student satisfaction: Two Australian universities the same agenda. Journal of Institutional Research (South East Asia), 7, 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, M., & Nair, C. S. (2010). Enrolling in higher education: The perceptions of stakeholders. Journal of Institutional Research, 15, 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, M., & Nair, C. S. (2012). The changing nature of teaching evaluations in Australian universities. Quality Assurance in Education, 20, 274–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, M., Roth, K., & Nair, S. (2010, October 12-15). Improving the quality of offshore student experience: Findings of a decade in three Australian universities. Paper presented at the Australian International Education Conference, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, M., & Widin, J. (2010). Indigenous students’ voices: Monitoring indigenous student satisfaction and retention in a large Australian university. Journal of Institutional Research, 15, 28–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, A. (2007). Comparative review of British, American and Australian national surveys of undergraduate students. York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathdee, R. (2009). Reputation in the sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30, 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M., Adams, S., & Birchenough, A. (1996). Student withdrawal from higher education. Educational Management and Administration, 24, 207–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugolini, M. (1999). University dropout: A problem and an opportunity. In Proceedings of the TQM for Higher Education Institutions Conference: Higher Education Institutions and the Issue of Total Quality, Verona, August 30–31 (pp. 417–436).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachtel, K. H. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, E. (2000). The relationships between student satisfaction and student retention in higher education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of North Carolina, Greensboro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, S. (2003). Closing the feedback loop: Ensuring effective action from student feedback. Tertiary Education and Management, 9, 145–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiese, M. (1994). College choice cognitive dissonance: Managing student/institution fit. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 5, 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., & Cappuccini-Ansfield, G. (2007). Fitness for purpose? National and institutional approaches to publicising the student voice. Quality in Higher Education, 13, 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemke, R. (2000). The best customer to have is the one you’ve already got. The Journal for Quality & Participation, 23, 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Western Sydney, Australia

    Leonid Grebennikov

  2. English Language and Foundation Studies Centre, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia

    Mahsood Shah

Authors
  1. Leonid Grebennikov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mahsood Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahsood Shah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grebennikov, L., Shah, M. Monitoring Trends in Student Satisfaction. Tert Educ Manag 19, 301–322 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2013.804114

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2013.804114

Keywords

Search

Navigation