Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Contested Curriculum: Academic learning and employability in higher education

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores the discourse of employability in higher education by investigating the understanding of different stakeholder groups (students, staff, employers) of the University of Nottingham (UK and China), and their fit to each other and to the educational literature. It finds that, while theories of life-long or life-wide learning position employability as an outcome of a holistic curriculum embracing both discipline and employability, stakeholders perceive learning for employability as a threat to disciplinary learning. The results suggest that to progress significant curriculum development in support of employability, a greater consensus of stakeholder views is needed with a deeper sympathy towards the integration of academic learning and employability. The article concludes with an assessment of the re-envisioning needed by Nottingham and other universities as they prepare students for an “employability” fit for purpose in a twenty-first century characterized by change and challenge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Artess, J., Forbes, P., & Ripmeester, N. (2011). Supporting graduate employ ability: HEI practice in other countries. BIS Research Paper Number 40. London: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, M. J. (1999). Oven-ready and self-basting: Taking stock of employability skills. Teaching in Higher Education, 4, 267–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, L. (2006). Graduate unemployment: Dilemmas and challenges in China’s move to mass higher education. China Quarterly, 185, 128–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2009). Knowing and becoming in the higher education curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 429–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2010). Life-wide education: A new and transformative concept for higher education. In N. J. Jackson & R. K. Law (Eds.). Enabling a more complete education: Encouraging, recognising and valuing life-wide learning in Higher Education. Conference proceedings, 13–14 April 2010 (pp. 23–34). Guildford: University of Surrey. Retrieved March 10, 2012, from https://doi.org/lifewidelearningconference.pbworks.com/E-proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrie, S. C. (2004). A research-based approach to generic graduate attributes policy. Higher Education Research and Development, 23, 261–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrie, S. C. (2009). Setting and monitoring academic standards for Australian higher education (Memorandum to AUQA in response to the Discussion Paper). Retrieved November 8, 2011, from https://doi.org/www.auqa.edu.au/qualityenhancement/academicstandards/responses/39.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. R. (1996). Q-Methodology and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 561–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caffarella, R. S. (2002). Planning programs for adult learners: A practical guide for educators, trainers and staff developers (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (2006). The university and the public good. Thesis Eleven, 84, 7–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camp, J., & Galloway, K. (2011, May 6). Developing an understanding of student participation in optional modules. Presentation at 18th annual conference on Teaching and Learning, The University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlon, E. (2008). The new engineer: Between employability and social responsibility. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33, 151–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranmer, S. (2006). Enhancing graduate employability: Best intentions and mixed outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M., & Devlin, M. (2007). Interdisciplinary higher education and the Melbourne model. In Creativity, enterprise, policy: New directions in education. Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia Conference 2007 (pp. 1–16). Open Polytechnic of New Zealand, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. (2005). Embedding and integrating employability. New Directions for Institutional Research, 128, 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillage, J., & Pollard, E. (1982). Employability: Developing a framework for policy analysis. London: Department for Education and Employment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, P. T., & Yorke, M. (2003). Assessment, learning and employability. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowden, K., Hall, S., Elliot, S., & Lewin, J. (2011). Employers’ perceptions of the employability skills of new graduates. London: Edge Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, S., Waters, L., & Briscoe, J. P. (2007). Employability during unemployment: Adaptability, career identity and human and social capital. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 71, 247–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau, M., & Leathwood, C. (2006). Graduates’ employment and the discourse of employability: A critical analysis. Journal of Education and Work, 19, 305–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1997). Cultivating humanity: A classical defence of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speight, S., Lackovic, N., & Cooker, L. (2012). Stakeholder attitudes towards employability in a Sino-British university. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 3, 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, J., & Yorke, M. (Eds.). (1998). Capability and quality in higher education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tymon, A. (2011). The student perspective on employability. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.604408

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Aberdeen. (2008). Enhancing learning: The Aberdeen approach: The final report of the curriculum commission. Retrieved April 23, 2012, from https://doi.org/www.adbn.ac.uk/curriculum-reform/.../Final_report_minus_appendices.doc

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Melbourne. (2012). The Melbourne curriculum. Retrieved March 12, 2012, from https://doi.org/www.learningandteaching.unimelb.edu.au/curriculum/melbourne_model

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Nottingham. (2010). Strategic plan 2010–2015. Retrieved May 15, 2012, from https://doi.org/www.nottingham.ac.uk/about/documents/universityofnottinghamstrategicplan2010-15. pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Nottingham. (2011). Teaching and learning strategy. Retrieved January 12, 2012, from https://doi.org/www.nottingham.ac.uk/teaching/universitystrategy/strategypolicy/tlstrategy11-15. aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. (2012). A capital or capabilities education narrative in a world of staggering inequalities. International Journal of Educational Development, 32, 384–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. E. J., & Blaze Corcoran, P. (2006). Sustainability as an outcome of transformative learning: Education for sustainable development in action (Technical Paper No. 3). In J. Holmberg & B. E. Samuelsson (Eds.). Drivers and barriers for implementing sustainable development in higher education (pp. 103–108). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M. (2010). Employability: Aligning the message, the medium and academic values. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 1, 2–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Speight.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Speight, S., Lackovic, N. & Cooker, L. The Contested Curriculum: Academic learning and employability in higher education. Tert Educ Manag 19, 112–126 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2012.756058

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2012.756058

Keywords

Navigation