Abstract
This study reports on the steering of a self-access learning center in a Japanese university by its “middle management” committee over the first years of its operation. Middle management practice was informed by an ethnographic archive of various facets of center use, particularly concerning language policy and curriculum integration, issues about which the archive reveals considerable shifts in stakeholder views over time. It is argued that this evidence-based middle management style has been an effective, but sometimes limited, means in decision-making as it succeeds in placing research at the center of middle management activity, not at its periphery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamson, J. (2010). I wonder why they don’t talk to us more: Exploring interdisciplinarity in Japanese higher education. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 9(1), 43–58.
Adamson, J. L., & Athanasiou, A. (2011). Middle management and diversity of evaluation of self-access. Independence, 51 (Spring), 18–21. Learner Autonomy SIG Newsletter, IATEFL.
Adamson, J. L., Brown, H., & Fujimoto-Adamson, N. (2011). Archiving self access: Methodological considerations. Asian EFL Journal, 13(2), 11–33.
Adamson, J., Fujimoto-Adamson, N., & Watanabe, Y. (2011, February 11). Student voices from self access: Informing language policy. Paper presented at MASH JALT Inviting Student Voices, Seisen Jogakuin College, Nagano.
Benor, S. B. (2010). Ethnolinguistic repertoire: Shifting the analytic focus in language and ethnicity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 14(2), 159–183.
Blackledge, A., & Creese, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching? The Modern Language Journal, 94(2), 103–115.
Blommaert, J., & Jie, D. (2010). Ethnographic field-work. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Boles, K. C. (1992, April 20–24). School restructuring by teachers: A study of the teaching project at the Edward Devotion School. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Briggs, A. (2006). Middle management in FE. London: Continuum Books.
Busher, H. (2005). The project of the other: Developing inclusive learning communities in schools. Oxford Review of Education, 31(3), 459–477.
Busher, H., Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Turner, C. (2007). Making sense of middle leadership: Community, power and practice. School Leadership & Management, 27(5), 405–422.
Busher, H., & Harris, A. (1999). Leadership of school subject areas: Tensions and dimensions of managing in the middle. School Leadership & Management, 19(3), 305–317.
Clegg, S. (2008). Academic identities under threat? British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 329–345.
Creese, A. (2002). The discursive construction of power in teacher partnerships: Language and subject specialists in mainstream schools. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 597–616.
Cummins, J. (2005). A proposal for action: Strategies for recognizing heritage language competence as a learning resource within the mainstream classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 89(4), 585–592.
Czander, W. M. (1993). The psychodynamics of work and organizations: Theory and application. London: The Guildford Press.
Doi, T. (1987). The anatomy of dependence. Tokyo: Kondansha.
Drever, E. (1995). Using semi-structured interviews in small-scale research. Edinburgh: The Scottish Council for Research in Education.
Floyd, A. (2012). “Turning points”: The personal and professional circumstances that lead academics to become middle managers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(2), 272–284.
Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility? School Leadership & Management, 23(3), 313–324.
Harvie, D. (2000). Alienation, class and enclosure in UK universities. Capital and Class, 71, 103–132.
Harvie, D. (2004). Commons and communities in the university: Some notes and some examples. The Commoner, 8, 1–10.
Heintz, C., & Origgi, G. (2008). Rethinking interdisciplinarity. Emergent issues. Interdisciplines. Retrieved October 15, 2008, from https://doi.org/www.interdisciplines.org/interdisciplinarity/papers/11
Hofstede, G. (1990). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired, 14(6). Retrieved September 5, 2011, from http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html
Jacoby, J., & Ochs, E. (1995). Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 171–183.
James, N. (2007). The learning trajectories of “old-timers”: Academic identities and communities of practice in higher education. In J. Hughes, N. Jewson, & L. Unwin (Eds.), Communities of practice: Critical perspectives (pp. 131–143). London: Routledge.
Johnson, B. (2003). Values in English language teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
Lambert, L. (1988). Building leadership capacity in schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lele, S., & Norgaard, R. (2005). Practising interdisciplinarity. BioScience, 55(11), 967–975.
Levin, B. (2010). Leadership for evidence-informed education. School Leadership & Management, 30(4), 303–315.
Levine, G. S. (2011). Code choice in the language classroom. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Lin, A. M. Y. (2005). Critical, transdisciplinary perspectives on language-in-education policy and practice in postcolonial contexts: The case of Hong Kong. In A. M. Y. Lin & P. W. Martin (Eds.), Decolonization, globalization: Language-in-education policy and practice (pp. 38–54). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Lucas, L. (2006). The research game in academic life. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Lumby, J., & Tomlinson, H. (2000). Principals speaking: Managerialism and leadership in further education. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 5(2), 139–151.
Martin, P. W. (2005). Bilingual encounters in the classroom. In J.-M. Dewale, A. Housen, & L. Wei (Eds.), Bilingualism: Beyond the basic principles (pp. 67–87). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Nakane, C. (1970). Japanese society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reid, W. A. (1992). The pursuit of curriculum: Schooling and the public interest. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Simkins, T., & Lumby, J. (2002). Cultural transformation in further education? Mapping the debate. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 7(1), 9–26.
Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. Retrieved September 6, 2012, from https://doi.org/www.sdexter.net/courses/589/downloads/SpillaneLeadership05.pdf
Taysum, A. (2010). Evidence informed leadership in education. London: Continuum International.
Timperley, H., & Robinson, V. (2000). Workload and the professional culture of teachers. Educational Management & Administration, 28(1), 47–62.
Trowler, P. (2010, July 15–16). Large scale university curriculum change: From practice to theory (and back again). Talk delivered at the Tomorrow’s Sustainable Universities Conference, University of Bradford, UK, pp. 1–7. Retrieved May 28, 2012, from https://doi.org/www.brad.ac.uk/sustainable-universities/media/SustainableUniversities/Keynote-Prof-Paul-Trowler.pdf
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adamson, J., Brown, H. Evidence-informed Leadership in the Japanese Context: Middle managers at a university self-access center. Tert Educ Manag 18, 353–374 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2012.725765
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2012.725765