Abstract
With the passage of the 1992 Further and Higher Education Act the British system of higher education formally moved from a binary to a unitary structure. However, ever since successive governments have argued for a diversified model of higher education within which institutions should pursue contrasting goals. This article offers an interpretation of the key ingredients of institutional diversification and constructs alternative structural models of higher education. It proceeds by exploring the changing structure of British higher education since the creation of the unitary model. The argument is that there has been a steady emergence of flexible sectors, which both converge and diversify. However, there is a danger that the 2011 White Paper, rather than sustaining flexible sectors, could intensify the nascent shift in the direction of stratification marked by increasing differentiation between sectors as they converge internally.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, S. (2011, April 7). Underlying disorders. Times Higher Education, pp. 35–42.
BPP University College. (2011, September 30). Retrieved from http://www.bpp.org.uk/
Browne, J. (2010, October). An independent review of higher education funding and student finance. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.independent.gov.uk/browne-report
Bruce, T. (2012, April). Universities and constitutional change in the UK: The impact of devolution on the higher education sector. Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute.
Catto, J.I. (Ed.). (1984). The history of the university of Oxford: Volume 1: The early Oxford schools. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Committee of University Chairmen. (2004). Governance code of practice and general principles. Bristol: HEFCE.
Committee on Higher Education. (1963). Report. London: HMSO.
Court, S. (2004). Government getting closer: Higher education and devolution in the UK. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(3), 151–175.
Davie, G.E. (1961). The democratic intellect. Edinburgh: The University Press.
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2011, June). Higher education: Students at the heart of the system (CM 8122). London: BIS.
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2011, August). Technical consultation. London: BIS.
Department for Education and Skills. (2003). The future of higher education. Norwich: HMSO.
Halsey, A.H. (1961). Pyramid of prestige. Universities Quarterly, 15(4), 341–344.
Halsey, A.H. (1995). Decline of donnish dominion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2000). Diversity in higher education: HEFCE policy statement. Bristol: HEFCE.
Pratt, J. (1997). The polytechnic experiment, 1966–1992. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
Pratt, J., & Burgess, T. (1974). The polytechnics: A report. London: Pitman.
Tapper, T. (2007). The governance of British higher education: The struggle for policy control. Dordrecht: Springer.
Times Higher Education. (2011, March 10). The cost of concentration. Times Higher Education, p. 20.
Times Higher Education. (2011, March 17). Losses of concentration: Post-92s hit hardest by quality related shake-up. Times Higher Education, pp. 6–7.
Treasury. (2003). Lambert review of university-business collaboration: Final report. London: HM Treasury.
Wojtas, O. (2002, October 18). Scots set up forum for policy. Times Higher Education Supplement, p. 52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Filippakou, O., Salter, B. & Tapper, T. The Changing Structure of British Higher Education: How diverse is it?. Tert Educ Manag 18, 321–333 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2012.704064
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2012.704064