Abstract
Transparency and comparability of higher education institutions especially in terms of their academic programmes and research activities are important issues for today’s working environment. This paper is an overview of a recently completed PhD thesis which outlines examples of selected Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries (Austria, Germany, Finland, the UK, the USA and Canada) with their different approaches to implementing a quality assurance system. These case studies are compared through peer-reviewed country reports and interviews with national and international experts. Based on this comparative study, useful recommendations are provided to create a functioning quality assurance system within an international higher education area.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austrian Accreditation Council (Ö AR). (2009). Neuordnung der externen Qualitätssicherung im Hochschulbereich. Stellungnahme des Ö AR zum Konsultationspapier des BMWF [Reorganisation of external quality assurance in higher education. Position of the Ö AR on the consultation paper of the Ministry of Science and Research]. November 2009. Retrieved December 20, 2011, from https://doi.org/www.akkreditierungsrat.at/files/downloads_2009/Stellungnahme%20Konsultation20OEAR.pdf
Bernhard, A. (2009). A knowledge-based society needs quality in higher education. Problems of Education, 12(12), 15–21.
Brennan, J. (2004). The social role of the contemporary university: Contradictions, boundaries and change. In CHERI (Ed.), Ten years on: Changing education in a changing world (pp. 22–26). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Brown, R. (2010). The current brouhaha about standards in England. Quality in Higher Education, 16(2), 129–137.
Canadian Council on Learning (CCL). (2009). Up to par. The challenge of demonstrating quality in Canadian post-secondary education. Challenges in Canadian post-secondary education. Ottawa: CCL.
Eaton, J. S. (2007). The US government and accreditation: Extraordinary attention. International Higher Education, 48, 12–13.
Eaton, J. S. (2010). Accreditation 2.0. Inside Higher Ed., January 18. Retrieved December 20, 2011, from https://doi.org/www.insidehighered.com/layout/set/print/views/2010/01/18/eaton
ENQA (European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education). (2009). Position paper on quality assurance in the EHEA in view of the Leuven and Louvain-la-Neuve meeting of ministers responsible for higher education, April 2009. Retrieved December 20, 2011, from https://doi.org/www.enqa.eu/files/ENQA_position_paper%20(3).pdf
Fachhochschulrat (FHR). (2009). Stellungnahme des FHR zum Konsultationspapier “Neuordnung der externen Qualitätssicherung im Hochschulbereich” [Position of the FHR on the consultation paper “Reorganisation of external quality assurance in higher education”]. October. Retrieved December 20, 2011, from https://doi.org/www.fhr.ac.at/fhr_inhalt/01_ueber_uns/fachhochschulrat.htm
Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council (FINHEEC). (2010). External review of Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council: Self-evaluation report. Tampere: FINHEEC.
Greisler, P. (2009, November). Rede des Leiters der Unterabteilung “Hochschulen” im Bundesministerin für Bildung und Forschung Herrn MinDirig Peter Greisler [Speech of the chief of the subunit “higher education institutions” in the Ministry of education and research, MinDir Peter Greisler]. Presentation at the VPH Kongress “Qualitätssicherung an deutschen Hochschulen im Umbruch”, Bonn.
Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9–34.
Helfferich, C. (2005). Die Qualität qualitativer Daten: Manual für die Durchführung qualitativer Interviews [The quality of qualitative data: Manual for conducting qualitative interviews]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fü r Sozialwissenschaften.
Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). (2009). Future arrangements for quality assurance in England and Northern Ireland. Policy document, Vol. 47/March. Bristol: HEFCE.
Mayring, P. (2003). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse, Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis, basics and techniques]. Weinheim: Beltz.
Meuser, M., & Nagel, U. (2002). ExpertInneninterviews — vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht. Ein Beitrag zur qualitativen Methodendiskussion [Expert interviews. A contribution to the qualitative discussion on methods]. In A. Bogner, B. Littig, & W. Menz (Eds.), Das Experteninterview — Theorie, Methode, Anwendung [Expert interview — theory, method, application] (pp. 71–93). Opladen: Leske+Budrich.
Middlehurst, R. (2001). Quality assurance implications of new forms of higher education. Part 1: A typology. Helsinki: ENQA.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010). Education at a glance 2010, OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.
Schray, V. (2006). Assuring quality in higher education: Key issues and questions for changing accreditation in the United States. A national dialogue: The Secretary of Education’s commission on the future of higher education, issue paper. Washington, DC: USDOE.
Schuetze, H. G. (2008). Quality assurance for higher education in Canada: From patchwork to national policy. Higher Education Forum, 5, 113–124.
Tapper, T., & Palfreyman, D. (2004). Convergence and divergence in the global model of mass higher education: Predictions for 2010. Oxford: CHEPS.
Teichler, U. (2007). Higher education systems. Conceptual frameworks, comparative perspectives, empirical findings. Rotterdam: Sense.
Tremblay, K. (with support from V. Kis). (2008). Assuring and improving quality. In P. Santiago, K. Tremblay, E. Basri, & E. Arnal (Eds.), Tertiary education for the knowledge society. OECD thematic review of tertiary education: Synthesis report (Vol. 2, pp. 7–72). Paris: OECD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernhard, A. Quality Assurance in an International Higher Education Area: A summary of a case-study approach and comparative analysis. Tert Educ Manag 18, 153–169 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2012.654504
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2012.654504