Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of the Centres of Excellence in Higher Education

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents an evaluation of the centres of excellence in higher education in Finland. This approach is an example of enhancement-led evaluation aiming to improve the long-term development of education. The study presents the Degree Programme in Civil Engineering of the Turku University of Applied Sciences, which was awarded the distinction as a centre of excellence. The pedagogical development of the degree programme is essential to achieve high quality in operation and outcomes. The methods of active learning are efficient in engaging students in working life and improving learning outcomes. The results of this study are useful for those who want to improve the quality of higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bonwell, C., & Eison, J. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (AEHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). Washington, DC: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, E., Stevens, R., & Cooper, M. (2007). Is collaborative grouping an effective institutional strategy? Using IMMEX to find new answers to an old question. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(6), 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H., & Colthorpe, K. (2007). The efficacy of interactive lecturing for students with diverse science backgrounds. Advances in Physiology Education, 31(1), 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H., & Colthorpe, K. (2008). Instructional design and assessment: Expanding voluntary active-learning opportunities for pharmacy students in a respiratory physiology module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(2), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • FINHEEC. (2007). Audits of quality assurance systems of Finnish higher education institutions: Audit manual for 2008-2011 (Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council 10:2007). Tampere: Tammer-Paino. Retrieved April 27, 2010, from https://doi.org/www.kka.fi/files/147/KKA_1007.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettunen, J. (2005). Implementation of strategies in continuing education. International Journal of Educational Management, 19(3), 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettunen, J. (2006). Strategic planning of regional development in higher education. Baltic Journal of Management, 2(3), 259–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettunen, J. (2008). A conceptual framework to help evaluate the quality of institutional performance. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(A), 322–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettunen, J. (2010). Cross-evaluation of degree programmes in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 18(1), 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (2006). Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. A., & Modell, H. I. (2003). Active learning in secondary and college science classrooms: A working model for helping the learner to learn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, A. R. (2008). Effects of active learning variants on student performance and learning perceptions. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2). Retrieved April 27, 2010, from https://doi.org/academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/v2n2/articles/PDFs/Article_Mohamed.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Nusche, D. (2008). Assessment of learning outcomes in higher education: A comparative review of selected practices (OECD Education Working Paper No. 15). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odedina, F. T., Clemmons, C. D., & Dukes, N. (2001). Multifaceted active-learning approach to teaching pharmacy health care and behaviour. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 65(3), 276–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, S. P., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2001). Active learning of respiratory physiology improves performance on respiratory physiology examinations. Advances in Physiology Education, 25(2), 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, I. K. (2000). Implementation of a pharmaceutics course in a large class through active learning using quick-thinks and case-based learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 64(A), 348–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarela, M., Jaatinen, P., Juntunen, K., Kauppi, A., Otala, L., Taskila, V.-M., … Kajaste, M. (2009). Ammattikorkeakoulujen koulutuksen laatuyksiköt 2008–2009 [Polytechnics’ quality of education services in 2008–2009] (Korkeakoulujen arviointineuvoston julkaisuja 2:2009). Tampere: Esa Print. Retrieved April 27, 2010, from https://doi.org/www.kka.fi/files/668/KKA_209.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverthorn, D. U. (2006). Claude Bernard distinguished lectureship: Teaching and learning in the interactive classroom. Advance in Physiology Education, 30(4), 135–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soini, J., Häkkinen, T., Kantola, I., Mertsola, M., Scheinin, M., Seikola, A., … Tuohi, R. (2008). Rakennustekniikan koulutusohjelman arviointiraportti—vankalta perustalta monimuotoista tutki-mus-ja kehitystoimintaa [Construction engineering evalution report—a sound basis for diverse research and development] (Turun ammattikorkeakoulun raportteja 76). Tampere: Juvenes Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tague, N. R. (2004). The quality toolbox. Retrieved January 25, 2010, from https://doi.org/www.asq.org/quality-press/display-item/index.html?item=H1224

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, H., & Nonaka, I. (2004). Hitotsubashi on knowledge management. Singapore: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuovinen, J. E., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 334–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilke, R. R. (2003). The effect of active learning on student characteristics in a human physiology course for nonmajors. Advances in Physiology Education, 27(4), 207–223.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rector’s Office, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Joukahaisenkatu 3 A, Turku, 20520, Finland

    Juha Matti Kettunen

Authors
  1. Juha Matti Kettunen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juha Matti Kettunen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kettunen, J.M. Evaluation of the Centres of Excellence in Higher Education. Tert Educ Manag 17, 151–161 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2011.565790

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2011.565790

Keywords

Search

Navigation