Abstract
The significance of competing conceptions of civic engagement is increasingly apparent as efforts are made to respond to the measurement imperative that characterises contemporary higher education. The importance of devising appropriate means of recognising and incentivising civic engagement is asserted in this paper and the potential offered by emerging measurement and mapping methodologies is considered. The empirical basis for the argument derives from a multi-site case study of the process of embedding community-based learning within Irish higher education. Analysis of interview data from four cases, drawn from the university and extra-university sector, yielded, inter alia, a typology of orientations to civic engagement. Findings are discussed, including those relating to orientations, ambivalence, scepticism, and legitimisation strategies. The case is made that these themes and the factors which impact on sustainability are mirrored within the wider domain of civic engagement—hence the opportunity to learn from a civically engaged pedagogy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Universities Community Engagement Alliance. (2006). Position paper. Retrieved July 5, 2009, from https://doi.org/www.universityworldnews.com/filemgmt_data/files/AUCEA%20Position% 20Paper.pdf
Bjarnason, S., & Coldstream, P. (Eds.). (2003). The idea of engagement: Universities in society. London: Association of Commonwealth Universities.
Boland, J. (2008). Embedding a civic dimension within the higher education curriculum: A study of policy, process and practice in Ireland. Unpublished Ed.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Boland, J. (2010). Teaching and learning through civic engagement: Prospects for sustainability in teacher education. Issues in Educational Research, 20(1), 1–20.
Butin, D. W. (2010). Service-learning in theory and practice: The future of community engagement in higher education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Clark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in higher education. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
Edgerton, R. (1994). The engaged campus: Organizing to service society’s needs. AAHE Bulletin, 47(1), 2–3.
Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple-helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. New York, NY: Routledge.
Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. London: Routledge.
Garlick, S., & Pryor, G. (2002). Compendium of good practice: University-regional development engagement initiatives. Canberra: Department of Transport and Regional Services, Australian Government.
Gonzalez-Perez, M.-A., Mac Labhrainn, I., & Mc Ilrath, L. (2007). The civic purpose and avowed mission of higher education institutions—diversity or uniformity? International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, Communities and Nations, 7(2), 187–197.
Harkavy, I. (2006). The role of universities in advancing citizenship and social justice in the 21st century. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 1(1), 5–37.
Hart, A., Norfhmore, S., & Gerhardt, C. (2009). Auditing, benchmarking and evaluating public engagement. Bristol: National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement.
HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England). (2007). HEFCE News: “Bridging the gap between higher education and the public”. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from https://doi.org/www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2007/beacons.asp
Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2010). Guide to performance indicators. HESA. Retrieved August 1, 2010, from https://doi.org/www.hesa.ac.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id = 1705&Itemid=141
Holland, B. (2001, November). Measuring the role of civic engagement in campus missions: Key concepts and challenges. Paper presented at the ASHE Symposium, Broadening the Carnegie Classifications’ Attention to Mission: Incorporating Public Service, Las Vegas, NV.
Honnet, E. P., & Poulson, S. J. (1989). Principles of good practice for combining service and learning. Racine, WI: The Johnson Foundation.
Howard, J. P. F. (1993). Community service in the curriculum. Inj. P. F. Howard (Ed.), Praxis I: A faculty case on community service learning (pp. 3–12). Ann Arbor, MI: OCSL Press.
Irish Universities Association. (2007). Strategic planning and decision support: Report on the implementation of the SIF sectoral project on key performance indicators. Dublin: Irish Universities Association.
Jacoby, B. (2003). Building partnerships for service-learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Jenkins, A., Breen, R., & Lindsay, R. (Eds.). (2003). Reshaping teaching in higher education: Linking teaching with research. London: Kogan Page.
Land, R. (2001). Agency, context and change in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(1), 5–20.
Lounsbury, M., & Pollack, S. (2001). Institutionalizing civic engagement: Shifting logics and the cultural repackaging of service-learning in US higher education. Organization, 8(2), 319–339.
Macfarlane, B. (2007). The academic citizen: The virtue of service in university life. Abingdon: Routledge.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA/London: Sage.
Molas-Gallart, J., Salter, A., Patel, P., Scott, A., & Duran, X. (2002). Measuring third stream activities: Science and technology policy research. Sussex: University of Sussex.
Pearce, J., Pearson, M., & Cameron, S. (2007). The ivory tower and beyond: The University of Bradford at the heart of its communities—The University of Bradford’s REAP approach to measuring its community engagement. Bradford: University of Bradford.
Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. London: University of California Press.
Simon, R. L. (1994). Neutrality and the academic ethic. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). London: Sage.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, Thousand Oaks, CA/London: Sage.
van Vught, F. (2010). Mapping the higher education landscape: The challenges and the tools. Linking society and universities: New missions for universities. Valencia: European Higher Education Society.
van Vught, F., Kaiser, F., File, J. M., Gathgens, C., Peter, R., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2010). U-Map: The European classifications of higher education institutions. Enschede: CHEPS.
Votruba, J. (2005). Leading the engaged institution. In A. J. Kezar, T. C. Chamber., & J. Burkhardt (Eds.), Higher education for the public good: Emerging voices from a national movement (pp. 263–271). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Watson, D. (2003). The university in the knowledge society. In S. Bjarnason & P. Coldstream (Eds.), The idea of engagement: Universities in society (pp. 25–47). London: Association of Commonwealth Universities.
Watson, D. (2007). Managing civic and community engagement. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Welch, M. (2006, November). Service learning as deeper education. Paper presented at the Service Learning Academy, Hodson Bay, Athlone.
Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and method. London: Sage.
Zlotkowski, E. A. (1995). Does service learning have a future? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 2(1), 123–133.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boland, J.A. Positioning Civic Engagement on the Higher Education Landscape: Insights from a civically engaged pedagogy. Tert Educ Manag 17, 101–115 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2011.562523
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2011.562523