Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On Performance in Higher Education: Towards performance governance

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper has a conceptual nature, and will depart from the literatures on performance management in general and public management in particular and confront them with the literature on higher education studies. Higher education mirrors the developments of other sectors, such as the increasing interest in performance measurement and the continuous enlargement of the basis for performance measurement, from financial, operational, and stakeholders’ towards developmental perspectives. The paper states some developments in performance management in higher education, and argues that it might be moving towards performance governance, as observed with other public services. The originality of the paper rests on an analysis of the developments in higher education in light of developments in organisational performance in general, and in the public sector in particular. It thus presents a hypothesis for further empirical testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amaral, A., Meek, V. L., & Larsen, I. M. (Eds.). (2003). The higher education managerial revolution. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1992). Improving higher education: Total quality care. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (2001). The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41(3), 221–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2008). Managing performance: International comparisons. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brignall, S. T. J., Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., & Markou, E. (1999). Improving service performance: A study of step-change versus continuous improvement. London: CIMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave, M., Hanney, S., Henkel, M., & Kogan, M. (1997). The use of performance indicators in higher education: The challenge of the quality movement (3rd ed). London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave, M., Hanney, S., Kogan, M., & Trevett, G. (1988). The use of performance indicators in higher education: A critical analysis of developing practice. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organisation in cross-national perspectives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. New York: Pergamon for IAU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G. (1991). The performance measurement manifesto. Harvard Business Review, 69(1), 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Foundation for Quality Management. (2003). The EFQM excellence model: Public and voluntary sector version. Brussels: EFQM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., Brignall, S., Silvestro, R., & Voss, C. (1991). Performance measurement in service businesses. London: The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons, J. A., & Fitzsimmons, M. J. (2000). Service management: Operations, strategy and information technology (3rd ed). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, P., Johnston, R., & Talbot, D. (2005). Customer confidence: The development of a “pre-experience” concept. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16(4), 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (2000). Service management and marketing: A customer relationship management approach (2nd ed). Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. (1999). Managing performance. In A. Rose & A. Lawton (Eds.). Public services management (pp. 238–259). Harlow: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., & Clark, G. (2005). Service operations management (2nd ed). Harlow: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liefner, I. (2003). Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems. Higher Education, 46(4), 469–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massy, W. F. (2003). Honoring the trust: Quality and cost containment in higher education. Bolton: Anker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo, A. I., Sarrico, C. S., & Radnor, Z. (2010). The influence of performance management systems on key actors in universities: The case of an English university. Public Management Review, 12(2), 233–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, J. M. (2002). Ética, democracia e estado: Para uma nova cultura da administração pública [Ethics, democracy and state: For a new culture of public administration]. Cascais: Principia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1988). On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: An overview of recent trends in higher education in Western Europe, 1986–1988. European Journal of Education, 23(1/2), 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, A. (1999). The performance measurement revolution: Why now and what next. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(2), 205–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niven, P. R. (2003). Balanced scorecard step-by-step for government and nonprofit agencies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance. Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P. (2010). Delivering public services: Time for a new theory. Public Management Review, 12(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (2003). Public sector, private sector: Where would we be without a few good stereotypes? In C. Pollitt (Ed.). The essential public manager (pp. 1–25). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quality Assurance Agency Scotland. (2008). Enhancement-led institutional review handbook. Glasgow: QAA Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radnor, Z. J., & Boaden, R. (2004). Developing an understanding of corporate anorexia. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(4), 424–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarrico, C. S. (1998). Performance measurement in UK universities: Bringing in the stakeholders’ perspectives using data envelopment analysis. Coventry: University of Warwick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarrico, C. S., & Dyson, R. G. (2000). Using DEA for planning in UK universities: An institutional perspective. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(7), 789–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2002). Re-balancing modern concepts of university governance. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(3), 235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2003). Managing successful universities. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2006). Managing good governance in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, C. (1999). Public performance: Towards a new model. Public Policy and Administration, 14(3), 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Higher Education Academy, Quality Assurance Agency, & Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2008). Quality enhancement and assurance: A changing picture? York: The Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1996). Trust, markets and accountability in higher education: A comparative perspective. Higher Education Policy, 9(4), 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Kingdom, Accounts Commission for Scotland. (1998). The measures of success: Developing a balanced scorecard to measure performance. Edinburgh: Accounts Commission for Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M. (1994). Enhancement-led higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 2(3), 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cláudia S. Sarrico.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarrico, C.S. On Performance in Higher Education: Towards performance governance. Tert Educ Manag 16, 145–158 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583881003775401

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583881003775401

Navigation