Abstract
The raison d’être of higher education institutions is to educate individuals, undertake research, and disseminate knowledge into the public domain. Changing values and norms in HEIs, partly as a product of “managerialism”, as well as increased competition for funding and other environmental factors, have moved autonomous institutions towards more business-like and private-sector ideals. These factors have different effects on the different “traditional” and “new” universities that operate within the higher education sector in the UK. This paper utilises the results of a UK survey of universities to determine the impact of these changes in universities. Results of a quantitative survey indicate that staff members in “traditional” universities feel strongly pressured to be research-recognised but that academic decisions are made by academics, whilst “new” universities viewed higher education as a business. Interestingly, both groups felt pressured to improve student numbers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackroyd, P., & Ackroyd, S. (1999). Problems of university governance in Britain: Is more accountability the solution. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(2), 171–185.
Baker, M. (2004, April 3). The university “market” is here. BBC News Online. Retrieved June 24, 2007, from https://doi.org/www.news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/3595049.stm
Beldoff, M. (1970). The plateglass universities. Madison, NJ: Associated University Press.
Bleiklie, I. (2003). Hierarchy and specialisation: On the institutional integration of higher education systems. European Journal of Education, 38(4), 341–355.
Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (1998). The university of learning: Beyond quality and competence in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
Buckland, R. (2004). Universities and industry: Does the Lambert Code of Governance meet the requirements of good governance. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4), 243–257.
Carpentier, V. (2006). Funding in higher education and economic growth in France and the United Kingdom 1921–2003. Higher Education Management and Policy, 18(3), 1–22.
Cassidy, S. (2006, October 19). Student numbers fall by 15,000 in first year of top-up fees. The Independent. Retrieved June 24, 2007, from https://doi.org/www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/student-numbers-fall-by-15000-in-first-year-of-topup-fees-420675.html
Chitty, C. (2004). Education policy in Britain (2nd ed). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Clarke, J., Gewirtz, S., & McLaughlin, E. (2000). Reinventing the Welfare State. In J. Clarke, S. Gewirtz & E. McLaughlin (Eds.). New managerialism, new welfare (pp. 1–26). London: Open University Press.
Davies, A., & Thomas, R. (2002). Managerialism and accountability in higher education: The gendered nature of restructuring and the costs to academic service. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(2), 179–193.
Dearing, R. (1997). Higher education in the learning society: Report of National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education. London: HMSO.
Dearlove, J. (2002). A continuing role for academics: The governance of UK universities in the post-Dearing era. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(3), 257–275.
Deem, R. (2004). The knowledge worker, the manager-academic and the contemporary UK university: New and old forms of public management. Financial Accountability and Management, 20(2), 107–128.
Deem, R. (2006). Changing research perspectives on the management of higher education: Can research permeate the activities of manager-academics. Higher Education Quarterly, 60(3), 203–228.
Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of “new managerialism” in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 13(2), 217–235.
Denman, B. D. (2005). What is a university in the 21st century. Higher Education Management and Policy, 17(2), 9–28.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2006). Widening participation in higher education. London: HMSO.
Dixon, S. (2006). The University of Leeds and the British higher educational system, 1963–2004. Northern History, 43(2), 303–325.
Dixon, J., Kouzmin, A., & Korac-Kakabadse, N. (1998). Managerialism—something old, something borrowed, little new: Economic prescription versus effective organizational change in public agencies. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 11(2/3), 164–187.
Dopson, S., & McNay, I. (2000). Organizational culture. In D. Warner & D. Palfreyman (Eds.). Higher education management, the key elements (pp. 16–32). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Duke, C. (1992). The learning university: Towards a new paradigm. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Lowe, A. (2002). Management research: An introduction (2nd ed). London: Sage.
FHE. (1992). The Further and Higher Education Act of 1992. London: HMSO.
Field, A. (2003). Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows: Advanced techniques for the beginner. London: Sage.
Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed). London: Sage.
Gibbons, M. (2005). Choice and responsibility: Innovation in a new context. Higher Education Management and Policy, 17(1), 9–22.
Gordon, G. (2003). University roles and career paths: Trends, scenarios and motivational challenges. Higher Education Management and Policy, 15(3), 89–104.
HEA. (2004). Higher Education Act 2004. London: HMSO.
Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Holman, D. (2000). Contemporary models of management education in the UK. Management Learning, 31(2), 197–217.
Kirkpatrick, I., & Ackroyd, S. (2003). Transforming the professional archetype. Public Management Review, 5(4), 511–531.
Lambert, R. (2003). Lambert review of business-university collaboration: Final report. London: HMSO.
Lee, H. C. (2005). The shift of the university paradigm and reform of the Korean university systems. Higher Education Management and Policy, 27(1), 93–106.
Malhotra, N. K., & Birks, D. F. (2006). Marketing research: An applied approach (updated 2nd European edition). London: Prentice Hall.
Marshall, M.N. 1996. Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522–525.
McSwite, O. C. (2001). The university as Hollywood: A “high concept” for Century 21. Organization, 8(2), 417–424.
Page, S. (2004). Academic ranking exercises: Do they achieve anything meaningful?—a personal view. Tourism Management, 26(5), 663–666.
Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the public services: The Anglo-American experience. Oxford: Basil.
Robbins Report. (1963). Report of the Committee on Higher Education. London: HMSO.
Sanderson, I. (2001). Performance measurement, evaluation and learning in modern local government. Public Administration, 79(2), 297–313.
Saunders, M., Lewis P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research method for business students (4th ed). London: Pearson Education.
Shattock, M. (1998). Dearing on governance: The wrong prescription. Higher Education Quarterly, 52(1), 35–47.
Shattock, M. (2004). The Lambert Code: Can we define best practice. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4), 229–242.
Shattock, M. (2006). Policy drivers in UK higher education in historical perspective: “Inside Out”, “Outside In” and the contribution of research. Higher Education Quarterly, 60(2), 130–140.
Sweet, S. A., & Grace-Martin, K. (2008). Data analysis with SPSS: A first course in applied statistics (3rd ed). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Taylor, J. (2003). Institutional diversity in UK higher education: Policy and outcomes since the end of the binary divide. Higher Education Quarterly, 57(3), 266–293.
Truscott, B. (1943). (pseudo: Allison Peers). Redbrick University. London: Faber.
West, P. W. A. (2006). Conflict in higher education and its resolution. Higher Education Quarterly, 60(2), 187–197.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kok, SK., Douglas, A., McClelland, B. et al. The Move Towards Managerialism: Perceptions of staff in “traditional” and “new” UK universities. Tert Educ Manag 16, 99–113 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583881003756740
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583881003756740