Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

University Autonomy in a Third-Generation University in Nigeria

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study examined the level of autonomy in one of Nigeria’s third-generation universities. Findings indicated that generally government intervention was rated as not unreasonable. Specifically, the study discovered that government never exerts any influence on the appointment, discipline, tenure and dismissal of staff; entry standards and pass and failure rates of students; curriculum and teaching; research and publication; and membership and control of senate, academic boards and staff. However, from time to time, government exerts its influence on the appointment and dismissal of vice chancellors; pay and conditions of service of staff; admissions quotas for minority groups; introduction of new teaching fields; membership and control of governing councils; standards in particular subjects and accreditation of courses; number of students to be admitted; closure and amalgamation of courses; and duration of academic years. Often, government exerts its influence on the control of governing councils and quality control of academic standards, number of students to be admitted and the level of fees to be charged by the universities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agasisti, T., & Catalano, G. (2006). Governance models of university systems—towards quasi markets? Tendencies and perspectives: A European comparison. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(3), 245–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadu Bello University (2000, September). ABU Council report on autonomy. p. 2. Zaria: Ahmadu Bello University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajayi, K. (1989). Educational development and management in Nigeria since independence. Ibadan: Vantage Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., & Johnson, R. (1998). University autonomy in twenty countries. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arikewuyo, M. O. (2004a). University management and staff unions in Nigeria: Issues and challenges. SA-eDUC: An Electronic Journal, 3(1), 15–22. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.puk.ac.za/opencms/export/puk/html/fakulteite/opvoed/educ/reviewed_artikels

    Google Scholar 

  • Arikewuyo, M. O. (2004b). Democracy and university education in Nigeria: Some constitutional considerations. Higher Education Policy and Management, 16(3), 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada (1998). Statement on academic freedom, university autonomy and social responsibility. May 5. Retrieved August 26, 2009, from https://doi.org/www.aucc.ca/pdf/english/statements/

    Google Scholar 

  • Babarinde, K. (2004). Is there a local relationship between autonomy and quality in higher education. Nigerian Journal of Educational Philosophy, 11(1), 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coaldrake, P., & Stedman, L. (1998). On the brink: Australian universities confronting their future. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. D. (1992). Administration: Academic. In B. R. Clark & G. Neave (Eds.). The encyclopedia of higher education (Vol. 2, pp. 1318–1329). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dlamini, C. R. M. (1997). Academic freedom and the autonomy of tertiary institutions. Available on https://doi.org/www.general.rau.ac.za/aambeeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekong, E. E. (2001). Management styles in Nigerian universities under military rule and challenges of democracy: How democratic can university management be? (Research paper). Association of African Universities (AAU). Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.aau.org/studyprogramme

    Google Scholar 

  • Felt, U. (2003). University autonomy in Europe: Changing paradigms in higher education policy. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.magna-charta.org/pdf/Documento_Felt.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. (2004). Analytical quality glossary. Quality Research International. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.qualityresearchinternational.com/glossary

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) (2004). Higher education in the United Kingdom. London: HEFCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Association of Universities (1998). Statement on academic freedom, university autonomy and social responsibility. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.iau-aiu.net/p_statements/afstatement.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Karran, T. (2007). Academic freedom in Europe: A preliminary comparative analysis. Higher Education Policy, 20(3), 289–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C. (1993). Universal issues in the development of higher education. In J. B. Balderston & F. Balderston (Eds.). Higher education in Indonesia: Evaluation and reform (pp. 19–35). Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, I. (1998). Staffing and institutional infrastructures—some considerations. Higher Education Management, 9(3), 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, I. (2007). Institutional autonomy revisited: Autonomy justified and accounted. Higher Education Policy, 20(3), 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munene, I. (1996). The crisis of governance in Kenya’s public universities: A reflection on national politics and institutional decline. Available on https://doi.org/www.ahero.uwc.ac.za

    Google Scholar 

  • Olorode, L. (2001). Democratic imperatives and higher education in Nigeria: The quest for social justice. I. Proceedings of the 12th general assembly of the Social Science Academy of Nigeria (pp. 29–36). Abuja: Social Science Academy of Nigeria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyeonoru, I. (2005). University autonomy and cost recovery policies: Union contestation and sustainable university system. UNESCO forum on higher education, research and knowledge. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.unesco.org/en/education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (2005). Education at a glance. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, S., & Tauch, C. (2005). Trends IV: European universities implementing Bologna. Brussels: EUA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (2005). An American perspective on British higher education: The decline of diversity, autonomy and trust in post war British higher education. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies, UC Berkeley. Retrieved from https://doi.org/www.repositories.cdlib.org/igs/WP2005-3

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) (1997). The records of the 29th session of the General Conference: Resolutions (Vol. 1, pp. 26–36). Austin/Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Education, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria

    M. Olalekan Arikewuyo

  2. National Institute for Educational Planning and Administration (NIEPA-NIGERIA), Ondo, Nigeria

    Gboyega Ilusanya

Authors
  1. M. Olalekan Arikewuyo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gboyega Ilusanya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Olalekan Arikewuyo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arikewuyo, M.O., Ilusanya, G. University Autonomy in a Third-Generation University in Nigeria. Tert Educ Manag 16, 81–98 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583881003756468

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583881003756468

Search

Navigation